O tratamento pode consistir em observação, vigilância ativa (também conhecida como conduta expectante), terapia de privação androgênica (TPA), radioterapia por feixe externo (EBRT), braquiterapia, prostatectomia radical ou uma combinação de dois ou mais destas modalidades.
EBRT, braquiterapia e prostatectomia radical são tratamentos definitivos. Caso sejam usados em pacientes com doença não metastática, o objetivo do tratamento é a cura. A TPA isolada não é curativa, mas pode retardar a progressão e ajudar a controlar os sintomas.
Há opções de tratamento adicionais disponíveis para doença metastática, inclusive terapia antiandrogênica, quimioterapia, imunoterapias e terapias direcionadas.
A decisão do tratamento depende dos fatores abaixo:
O grupo de risco do paciente designado ao diagnóstico.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[5]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. December 2021 [internet publication]
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131
[139]Bekelman JE, Rumble RB, Freedland SJ. Clinically localized prostate cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline endorsement of an AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline summary. J Oncol Pract. 2018 Oct;14(10):618-24.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30199312?tool=bestpractice.com
Os grupos de estratificação de risco definidos pela National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) são utilizados nas seções de tratamento deste tópico. Outros grupos de risco podem ser usados, dependendo da região; portanto, as orientações locais devem ser consultadas ao designar grupos de risco a pacientes com câncer de próstata.[140]Zelic R, Garmo H, Zugna D, et al. Predicting prostate cancer death with different pretreatment risk stratification tools: a head-to-head comparison in a nationwide cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):180-8.
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/272280/1-s2.0-S0302283820X00066/1-s2.0-S0302283820301913/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEJv%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FwEaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJHMEUCIQD%2BonCE80weeRJYb0mOcDAsFJERxJi5Si85K9jtWjR7VwIgEG6pREZWb5Obp9ZQsx00wB3eMvMuD7sREXv%2BrmresboqswUIQxAFGgwwNTkwMDM1NDY4NjUiDLp9JekpppJ46zjIDyqQBYr6J6kkL5Izm3Al8ndyFHV9Tulc85fOSqfEfTbK7MZwpRGyxvNjLeSCtxIx41%2B%2BgPUOmiVC7Mh2w6PJ2kDEPMx2vhQALrtczjUP9y88Y4skqP9QlnkDUj9ZXQERjxCTGQd1NHASHlmjqnJYajPzdKv7A6SVftmHN8QacOes%2FbCxRbtcj3O3YkT3wSNBmj%2F2hU0II6fiKDxehHTbG%2FUCwRLN0ny4FYK2qSYtvnug2Ir4YC%2FntlEKJE%2BK0EcI%2FbYbY3kyRlSplDF1qJ4vFsRq3nUemkLs0n9XXgTJNDCiyThMO4HmimWGYjFXLlofK7veG2BPrCSQtEV%2FH7wVMyAPg2W%2Bom6qFq8h64aNy0SUUj8AJ9Wrc%2BNQ0nwXKL30T9%2FKOqSSo%2B%2BPYl6Q4u%2BEH7ps1UU1PlukTI%2FCvs198XjmoAF8WV2R4NysWPJwuzGZhetoNuZvMMO1i%2BVLbd7vfK3UUxlLD99qKFy2jwMx1xWmg11X%2B%2BDOTITkSPzdTzqt0OqDtNekIDhWmdY6QJhup3nFWz9k%2BxF0ZRqkZM7vAUElDKubA2JcLSUkCEVrYlVkwrlXJeGvIiBh3rcCV2HxaEvwgQ77jAM5UYmC%2Fvj9c%2B%2BFeA08Sc7R%2B6r5bSgPTcjpbzJA3hZPT60PHNsL0zN%2BJ%2Fq%2FKKazOAKCUPHFxdvQS13NBmzLWJSDExWhc1%2BCmfOKnJiIeunuc3GBSiwvJXum1utZlDgT1O6SNeNXK%2Fv5SIQkJ1qSxBZdCOu6%2Fjy2%2FJLue6Uy58%2BI7rwkVfpTeTnCRU1rtEbbJ9z9c3i0%2B0%2BopuFvzZ7%2FXVSNHzIfHfdjsLud2YVKpNSb6rFskKXwjeQ3MlR97ieZNfnkBZZt0S%2BSK%2FxSJYPcMOfC58AGOrEBrGTimZ3inao7RKIk1WV6pgrq86Juyru0jnN5vG33bMGTS%2F0UB5C3WET8crDhoQh5FVJ2FvsQNE1dfIhwph%2F4U6QSAl3y1SCVaR6xA86kYZGNg6jaNk4iNazbdscohVtF%2B0WX3bsMWOiXTAAMCE4diAd8VOIQ396Qocp%2FEJmuitNX4qyOcp2JS9x5z7PzO8d%2B97jdhoET4%2FKXXuqz9L6EYhOPbGnGY2DqZO8wuJNHG8qL&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20250506T110459Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAQ3PHCVTY2DU7OOR5%2F20250506%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=04e680871dc6c2f8f25793d9da72a6067c8596be6249bbdfcff6f1c0cd4d1f4d&hash=fd211c9fdbc38eaf71096872e246fea763edf1d02cb7bc09c94b15ca437f1ff9&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S0302283820301913&tid=spdf-a5cdbd05-968e-4005-bf3b-02f3a43a1b9a&sid=c60b29346afe6043610a2da4794bd2e90c25gxrqb&type=client&tsoh=d3d3LnNjaWVuY2VkaXJlY3QuY29t&rh=d3d3LnNjaWVuY2VkaXJlY3QuY29t&ua=13085b5600500405055703&rr=93b7fff8ce2cff83&cc=in
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31606332?tool=bestpractice.com
Consulte Classificação.
A expectativa de vida do paciente (ou seja, >10 anos ou <10 anos) com base na idade, comorbidades e estado de saúde. A International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) recomenda que o tratamento seja baseado no estado de saúde e não na idade.[141]Boyle HJ, Alibhai S, Decoster L, et al. Updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on prostate cancer management in older patients. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:116-36.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195356?tool=bestpractice.com
Os pacientes idosos (com idade >70 anos) são atribuídos a um grupo de estado de saúde (saudável, vulnerável, frágil) com base na avaliação da dependência, das comorbidades e do estado nutricional. A SIOG recomenda o rastreamento para fragilidade com a ferramenta G8 e para o comprometimento cognitivo com o instrumento Mini-COG.[141]Boyle HJ, Alibhai S, Decoster L, et al. Updated recommendations of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology on prostate cancer management in older patients. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jul;116:116-36.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195356?tool=bestpractice.com
Preferências do paciente (por exemplo, efeitos adversos do tratamento versus viver com câncer) e tomada de decisão compartilhada com o paciente.[142]American Urological Association; Makarov D, Fagerlin A, Finkelstein J, et al. Implementation of shared decision making into urological practice. April 2022 [internet publication].
https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/quality-and-measurement/clinical-consensus-statements-and-quality-improvement-issue-briefs-(ccs-and-qiibs)/shared-decision-making
Os nomogramas (por exemplo, nomograma de Partin e nomograma do Memorial-Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) fornecem estimativas de risco individualizadas relacionadas à doença, que facilitam as decisões relacionadas ao manejo.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[111]Tosoian JJ, Chappidi M, Feng Z, et al. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era. BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):676-83.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13573
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27367645?tool=bestpractice.com
Brady Urological Institute: the Partin tables
Opens in new window
Memorial-Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: prostate cancer nomograms
Opens in new window
Ferramentas adicionais (por exemplo, classificador genômico Decipher de 22 genes, testes genéticos somáticos e de linha germinativa, exames de imagem) podem fornecer informações para refinar o manejo do risco e informar as decisões de tratamento em pacientes selecionados.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[102]Eggener SE, Rumble RB, Armstrong AJ, et al. Molecular biomarkers in localized prostate cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1474-94.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.19.02768
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829902?tool=bestpractice.com
[108]Yu EY, Rumble RB, Agarwal N, et al. Germline and somatic genomic testing for metastatic prostate cancer: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb 20;43(6):748-58.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO-24-02608?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39787437?tool=bestpractice.com
Observação
A observação envolve o monitoramento da evolução da doença a fim de administrar o tratamento ou terapia paliativa quando os sintomas surgirem ou quando houver uma alteração nos achados clínicos que sugira iminência dos sintomas.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A observação deve incluir história e exame físico no máximo a cada 12 meses (sem biópsias de próstata).[143]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com
Caso os pacientes se tornem sintomáticos, deve-se realizar uma avaliação (inclusive antígeno prostático específico [PSA] e tempo de duplicação do PSA [PSADT], estimativa da expectativa de vida e medições da qualidade de vida) para determinar a necessidade e a consideração de tratamento ou cuidados paliativos.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Vigilância ativa
Envolve o monitoramento do ciclo da doença (com o uso adicional de biópsias da próstata) até que os sintomas ou sinais da doença se tornem clinicamente evidentes, com a expectativa de administrar o tratamento definitivo (por exemplo, radioterapia ou prostatectomia radical, com ou sem TPA) se houver progressão da doença.
Para a vigilância ativa, os níveis de PSA e o exame de toque retal (ETR) são verificados não mais do que a cada 6 meses e 12 meses, respectivamente, a menos que clinicamente indicado.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[143]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com
A repetição da biópsia da próstata e a repetição da ressonância nuclear magnética (RNM) multiparamétrica são realizadas no máximo a cada 12 meses, a menos que clinicamente indicado.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A intensidade da vigilância ativa pode ser individualizada, com base no paciente e em fatores relacionados ao tumor, risco de progressão e expectativa de vida. No entanto, a maioria dos pacientes deve repetir as biópsias a cada 2-5 anos.
Determinação da adequação do paciente para vigilância ativa
O exame confirmatório é recomendado antes de iniciar a vigilância ativa (6-12 meses após o diagnóstico) se a RNM multiparamétrica não tiver sido realizada antes da biópsia diagnóstica.[144]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
O papel dos testes confirmatórios é identificar aqueles com alto risco de atualização ou progressão futura da doença e garantir que os pacientes apropriados sejam selecionados para vigilância ativa.[144]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
O teste confirmatório para vigilância ativa envolve a realização de uma RNM multiparamétrica (com cálculo de densidade de PSA), se disponível, e/ou repetição da biópsia (sistemática e direcionada) e/ou análise molecular do tumor.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[90]Schoots IG, Nieboer D, Giganti F, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-58.
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.14358
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29679430?tool=bestpractice.com
[145]Klotz L, Pond G, Loblaw A, et al. Randomized study of systematic biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging and targeted and systematic biopsy in men on active surveillance (ASIST): 2-year postbiopsy follow-up. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708295?tool=bestpractice.com
Todos os pacientes devem ter uma biópsia confirmatória da próstata dentro de 1-2 anos após a biópsia diagnóstica inicial.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Terapia de privação androgênica (TPA)
O câncer de próstata em estádio inicial é quase sempre dependente de andrógenos. A privação de andrógenos (para retardar ou reduzir o crescimento do câncer de próstata) pode ser alcançada clinicamente, com:
um agonista do hormônio liberador do hormônio luteinizante (LHRH) (por exemplo, gosserrelina, leuprorrelina, triptorrelina) ou
um antagonista de LHRH (por exemplo, degarelix, relugolix), ou
por castração cirúrgica (orquiectomia bilateral).[146]Denis L. Role of maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer. Prostate Suppl. 1994;5:17-22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8172710?tool=bestpractice.com
A castração cirúrgica raramente é usada.
A adição de um antiandrogênio de primeira geração (por exemplo, nilutamida, flutamida, bicalutamida) a um agonista de LHRH pode ser considerada para atingir a supressão adequada de testosterona em doenças de risco médio desfavoráveis (expectativa de vida >5 anos).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A abiraterona, um antiandrogênio de segunda geração, pode ser usada em combinação com a TPA em doenças de alto e muito alto risco e em doenças metastáticas.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Oriente os pacientes sobre o risco de efeitos adversos com a TPA, incluindo perda rápida de densidade mineral óssea, o que aumenta o risco de osteoporose e fraturas.[147]Ross RW, Small EJ. Osteoporosis in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1952-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11956415?tool=bestpractice.com
A avaliação de risco para perda óssea relacionada ao tratamento é recomendada para todos os pacientes que iniciam a TPA.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[148]Suarez-Almazor ME, Pundole X, Cabanillas G, et al. Association of bone mineral density testing with risk of major osteoporotic fractures among older men receiving androgen deprivation therapy to treat localized or regional prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225432.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2790600
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35363269?tool=bestpractice.com
University of Sheffield: FRAX tool
Opens in new window Consulte Complicações.
Agonistas do LHRH podem causar um aumento no nível de testosterona durante a primeira semana de tratamento (surto de testosterona), que pode exacerbar os sintomas em pacientes com doença metastática.[149]Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A, et al. Flutamide eliminates the risk of disease flare in prostatic cancer patients treated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):804-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3309363?tool=bestpractice.com
[150]Kuhn JM, Billebaud T, Navratil H, et al. Prevention of the transient adverse effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (buserelin) in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by administration of an antiandrogen (nilutamide). N Engl J Med. 1989 Aug 17;321(7):413-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2503723?tool=bestpractice.com
[151]Bubley GJ. Is the flare phenomenon clinically significant? Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 suppl 1):5-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502435?tool=bestpractice.com
Se um agonista de LHRH for usado no cenário metastático, ele deve ser combinado com um antiandrogênio de primeira geração por ≥7 dias para evitar o aumento de testosterona ou, alternativamente, um antagonista de LHRH pode ser usado antes da transição para um agonista de LHRH.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[152]Crawford ED, Heidenreich A, Lawrentschuk N, et al. Androgen-targeted therapy in men with prostate cancer: evolving practice and future considerations. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):24-38.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6370592
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131604?tool=bestpractice.com
Radioterapia por feixe externo (EBRT)
A EBRT fornece radiação ao tecido canceroso com precisão. A radioterapia de intensidade modulada e a radioterapia guiada por imagem são as técnicas de EBRT padrão porque permitem uma distribuição altamente conformacional da radiação que minimiza a dose para os tecidos normais (bexiga, reto e intestino delgado), diminuindo potencialmente a toxicidade para essas estruturas. A radioterapia estereotáxica corpórea (SBRT) é a técnica usada para fornecer radioterapia ultra-hipofracionada.
Materiais espaçadores perirretais biocompatíveis e biodegradáveis podem ser implantados entre a próstata e o reto em pacientes com doença confinada ao órgão para reduzir a toxicidade para o reto.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[153]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com
[154]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85.
https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Pacientes com sintomas urinários iniciais significativos podem não ser bons candidatos para EBRT devido ao aumento do risco de obstrução urinária.
Esquemas de fracionamento de EBRT
Vários esquemas de EBRT têm eficácia e toxicidade aceitáveis, incluindo hipofracionamento moderado, fracionamento convencional e ultra-hipofracionamento.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer early detection [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
[155]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[156]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[157]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
[
]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullMostre-me a resposta
O hipofracionamento moderado é a abordagem preferencial.[158]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com
Embora encurte a duração do tratamento, ele pode aumentar livremente o risco de efeitos adversos gastrointestinais agudos, em comparação com o fracionamento convencional.[155]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Controle bioquímico e toxicidade comparáveis foram relatados com ultra-hipofracionamento versus esquemas de fracionamento mais prolongados, mas doses totais mais altas estão associadas a um risco maior de complicações geniturinárias tardias graves.[157]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
O hipofracionamento moderado ou o ultra-hipofracionamento podem ser opções para todos os grupos de risco; o fracionamento convencional não é recomendado para doenças de baixo risco ou de risco médio favorável.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Braquiterapia
A braquiterapia (taxa de dose baixa ou taxa de dose alta) pode ser administrada como monoterapia ou como reforço de braquiterapia com EBRT, dependendo do risco.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[159]Chin J, Rumble RB, Kollmeier M, et al. Brachytherapy for patients with prostate cancer: American Society Of Clinical Oncology/Cancer Care Ontario joint guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 20;35(15):1737-43.
http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0466
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28346805?tool=bestpractice.com
A braquiterapia de baixa taxa de dose envolve o implante transperineal permanente de fontes radioativas na próstata sem nenhuma incisão. A dose de radiação mais alta é confinada à próstata e a um pequeno volume dos tecidos adjacentes. A intensidade da radiação diminui com o tempo, mas os baixos níveis de radioatividade na próstata persistirão por 4-6 meses, dependendo da meia-vida do isótopo usado. Devem ser tomadas precauções em curto prazo para minimizar o contato próximo com gestantes e crianças pequenas.
A braquiterapia com alta taxa de dose envolve a colocação transperineal de cateteres de tratamento, pelos quais uma fonte radioativa individual é roboticamente aplicada, de forma temporária, em várias posições fixas para alcançar uma dose conformacional de radiação na próstata. No final do tratamento, os cateteres são removidos. O tratamento é repetido até cinco vezes para obter a dose curativa para a próstata.
Prostatectomia radical
A prostatectomia radical é uma opção de tratamento (dependendo da preferência do paciente e da adequação à cirurgia) quando o tumor está confinado à próstata em um paciente com expectativa de vida ≥10 anos; os linfonodos pélvicos podem ser dissecados dependendo do nomograma que prediz o risco de metástases nos linfonodos.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Classicamente, a próstata e a cápsula prostática são removidas por excisão da uretra na junção prostatomembranosa. As vesículas seminais, ampola e o canal deferente também são removidos. Das duas abordagens cirúrgicas abertas clássicas (retropúbica/suprapúbica e perineal), a abordagem retropúbica/suprapúbica é a preferencial para muitos urologistas, pois essa abordagem facilita o acesso para a dissecção dos linfonodos pélvicos.
As prostatectomias radicais com assistência laparoscópica e robótica são abordagens alternativas que, normalmente, envolvem cinco ou seis pequenas incisões no abdome, através das quais a próstata é removida, teoricamente poupando os nervos que seriam danificados com mais facilidade por uma abordagem retropúbica/suprapúbica.[160]Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749852?tool=bestpractice.com
[161]Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749850?tool=bestpractice.com
Uma revisão Cochrane constatou que a prostatectomia radical com assistência laparoscópica ou robótica pode reduzir o período de internação e o número de transfusões de sangue, em comparação com a prostatectomia radical com cirurgia aberta. No entanto, as melhoras em termos de desfechos oncológicos (por exemplo, recorrência ou sobrevida) foram inconclusivas.[162]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625.
http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com
As complicações (por exemplo, disfunção sexual e urinária) parecem ser similares entre essas abordagens alternativas e a abordagem cirúrgica aberta.[162]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625.
http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com
[163]Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-60.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017351?tool=bestpractice.com
Ficou comprovado que a prostatectomia radical em homens com câncer de próstata clinicamente localizado não detectado por meio de rastreamento com PSA melhora a mortalidade específica por câncer de próstata, a sobrevida global e o risco de evolução local e metástase da doença, em comparação com a vigilância ativa.[164]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com
[165]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com
Foi demonstrado que esses benefícios continuam a longo prazo, particularmente em pessoas com idade ≤65 anos.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com
[167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer - 29-year follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-29.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807801
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575473?tool=bestpractice.com
A prostatectomia radical em homens com câncer de próstata localizado detectado por PSA não reduz significativamente a mortalidade por todas as causas ou a mortalidade específica por câncer de próstata em comparação com vigilância ativa ou observação.[168]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[169]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[170]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
Além disso, a prostatectomia radical está associada ao aumento da frequência de eventos adversos em comparação com a vigilância ativa e a observação.[168]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[169]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[170]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495338?tool=bestpractice.com
[
]
How does radical prostatectomy compare with deferred treatment for people with localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.3248/fullMostre-me a resposta
Doença de muito baixo risco
Para doenças de muito baixo risco, todos os critérios a seguir devem ser atendidos:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
tumor cT1c
Grupo de grau 1
PSA <10 microgramas/L (<10 nanogramas/mL)
<3 fragmentos/núcleos de biópsia de próstata positivos, ≤50% de câncer em cada fragmento/núcleo
Densidade do PSA <0.15 micrograma/L/g (<0.15 nanograma/mL/g).
A observação é recomendada para pacientes com doença de risco muito baixo e expectativa de vida <10 anos. Pacientes com expectativa de vida ≤5 anos que se tornam sintomáticos durante a observação podem receber TPA isoladamente (agonista ou antagonista de LHRH ou orquiectomia) como tratamento paliativo.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Se a expectativa de vida for ≥10 anos, a vigilância ativa é recomendada.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Os pacientes podem passar para observação se sua expectativa de vida diminuir para <10 anos.
Doença de baixo risco
Para a doença de baixo risco, os pacientes apresentam todos os seguintes fatores e não qualificam para doença de risco muito baixo:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A observação é recomendada para pacientes com doença de baixo risco e expectativa de vida <10 anos. Pacientes com expectativa de vida ≤5 que se tornam sintomáticos durante a observação podem receber TPA isolada para paliação.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Se a expectativa de vida for ≥10 anos, as opções de tratamento incluem:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[173]Kupelian PA, Potters L, Khuntia D, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≥72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):25-33.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14697417?tool=bestpractice.com
[174]D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749478?tool=bestpractice.com
[175]Alicikus ZA, Yamada Y, Zhang Z, et al. Ten-year outcomes of high-dose, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011 Apr 1;117(7):1429-37.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.25467/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21425143?tool=bestpractice.com
A vigilância ativa é a abordagem de primeira escolha para a maioria dos pacientes com doença de baixo risco se a expectativa de vida for ≥10 anos, mas costuma ser subutilizada devido às preferências dos pacientes e à falta de adesão.[176]Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D, et al. Factors influencing men's choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):261-80.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29598981?tool=bestpractice.com
[177]Salari K, Kuppermann D, Preston MA, et al. Active surveillance of prostate cancer is a viable option for men younger than 60 years. J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):721-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30664083?tool=bestpractice.com
O uso de informações padronizadas do paciente, a educação clínica e as diretrizes podem melhorar a captação e a adesão à vigilância ativa.[176]Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D, et al. Factors influencing men's choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):261-80.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29598981?tool=bestpractice.com
Os fatores que podem aumentar a probabilidade de reclassificação e início do tratamento incluem alta densidade de PSA, ≥3 núcleos positivos, alto risco genômico e/ou uma mutação das linhas germinativas em BRCA2 conhecida.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Doença de risco intermediário favorável ou desfavorável
No caso de doença de risco intermediário favorável, os pacientes não apresentam características de alto risco ou risco muito alto e apresentam todos os seguintes fatores:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Um fator de risco intermediário (tumor cT2b-c; grupo de grau 2; ou PSA 10-20 microgramas/L [10-20 nanogramas/mL])
Grupo de grau 1 (se não grupo de grau 2)
Porcentagem de núcleos de biópsia positivos <50%.
As opções de tratamento para os pacientes com doença de risco intermediário favorável são geralmente iguais às dos pacientes com doença de baixo risco, exceto pelo fato de que a EBRT ou a braquiterapia podem ser oferecidas se a expectativa de vida for de 5-10 anos (embora a observação seja preferível).[173]Kupelian PA, Potters L, Khuntia D, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy ≥72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):25-33.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14697417?tool=bestpractice.com
[174]D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998 Sep 16;280(11):969-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749478?tool=bestpractice.com
[175]Alicikus ZA, Yamada Y, Zhang Z, et al. Ten-year outcomes of high-dose, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011 Apr 1;117(7):1429-37.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.25467/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21425143?tool=bestpractice.com
Os pacientes com expectativa de vida ≥10 anos tratados com prostatectomia radical podem ser submetidos a dissecção dos linfonodos pélvicos (dependendo da avaliação do nomograma).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
No caso de doença de risco intermediário não favorável, os pacientes não apresentam características de alto risco ou risco muito alto e apresentam um ou mais dos seguintes fatores:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A opção de tratamento para os pacientes com doença de risco intermediário desfavorável e expectativa de vida ≤5 anos é a observação. A TPA isolada pode ser usada para paliação se os pacientes se tornarem sintomáticos durante a observação.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Se a expectativa de vida for >5 anos, as opções de tratamento para doença de risco médio desfavorável são:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observação (se a expectativa de vida for de 5 a 10 anos)
EBRT (com ou sem reforço de braquiterapia) ou braquiterapia isolada, associada a TPA por 4 a 6 meses (se expectativa de vida >5 anos)
Prostatectomia radical com dissecção dos linfonodos pélvicos, dependendo da preferência do paciente e da adequação à cirurgia (se a expectativa de vida for >10 anos)
Não há nenhuma abordagem padrão para o tratamento de pacientes com doença de risco intermediário. É difícil avaliar a eficácia e os danos comparativos de tratamentos de câncer de próstata localizado, devido às limitações das evidências.[178]Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):435-48.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18252677?tool=bestpractice.com
[179]Wilt TJ, Ullman KE, Linskens EJ, et al. Therapies for clinically localized prostate cancer: a comparative effectiveness review. J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):967-76.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001578
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33350857?tool=bestpractice.com
Os efeitos adversos dos tratamentos podem influenciar a escolha do tratamento.[180]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com
[181]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67.
https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com
[182]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com
[183]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com
O agravamento da incontinência urinária e disfunção erétil/sexual foi relatado em pacientes submetidos à prostatectomia radical, em comparação com outros tratamentos.[184]Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Resnick MJ, et al. Association between radiation therapy, surgery, or observation for localized prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes after 3 years. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1126-40.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2612618
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324093?tool=bestpractice.com
[185]Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-50.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324092?tool=bestpractice.com
[186]Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, et al. Patient-reported outcomes through 5 years for active surveillance, surgery, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-63.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.20675
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935027?tool=bestpractice.com
[187]Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-80.
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.15739
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373443?tool=bestpractice.com
A braquiterapia pode estar associada ao agravamento da obstrução e irritação urinária em curto prazo, e a EBRT com o agravamento da função intestinal e sintomas intestinais de curto prazo.[185]Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-50.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324092?tool=bestpractice.com
[187]Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-80.
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.15739
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373443?tool=bestpractice.com
[188]Lardas M, Liew M, van den Bergh RC, et al. Quality of life outcomes after primary treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):869-85.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283817305353?via%3Dihub
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757301?tool=bestpractice.com
A TPA (por exemplo, um agonista ou antagonista de LHRH) pode ser administrada antes, durante e/ou depois da radioterapia, por um total de 4 a 6 meses, em pacientes com doença de risco médio desfavorável.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
TPA com duração superior a 6 meses não é recomendada em pacientes com doença de risco intermediário.[189]Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RW, et al. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1013-21.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9060541?tool=bestpractice.com
[190]Pilepich MV, Winter K, John MJ, et al. Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1243-52.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11483335?tool=bestpractice.com
A TPA pode ter vários efeitos sinérgicos quando combinada com a radioterapia e está associada a um benefício clínico significativo.[191]Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al. Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):1904-11.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12743142?tool=bestpractice.com
[192]D'Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M, et al. 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):821-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15315996?tool=bestpractice.com
[193]Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: results of EORTC trial 22991. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1748-56.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976418?tool=bestpractice.com
[194]Shelley MD, Kumar S, Wilt T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Feb;35(1):9-17.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926640?tool=bestpractice.com
[195]Locke JA, Dal Pra A, Supiot S, et al. Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):193-204.
https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.50
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25800395?tool=bestpractice.com
[196]D'Amico AV, Chen MH, Renshaw AA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer recurrence in men treated with radiation alone or in conjunction with combined or less than combined androgen suppression therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):2979-83.
https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9699
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18565884?tool=bestpractice.com
[197]Jones CU, Hunt D, McGowan DG, et al. Radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):107-18.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1012348
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21751904?tool=bestpractice.com
[198]Bolla M, Neven A, Maingon P, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation in prostate cancer: 12-year results of EORTC trial 22991 in patients with localized intermediate-risk disease. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;39(27):3022-33.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.21.00855
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310202?tool=bestpractice.com
A radiação com altas doses no tecido da próstata e periprostático é recomendada para pacientes candidatos à radioterapia associada à TPA.[199]Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765406?tool=bestpractice.com
[200]Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):491-500.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635694?tool=bestpractice.com
[201]Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):501-10.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635695?tool=bestpractice.com
[202]Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128107?tool=bestpractice.com
[203]Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160131?tool=bestpractice.com
O aumento da dose com EBRT isoladamente ou com a adição de reforço de braquiterapia à EBRT melhora o controle bioquímico, mas aumenta a toxicidade.[204]Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262473?tool=bestpractice.com
[205]Rodda S, Tyldesley S, Morris WJ, et al. ASCENDE-RT: an analysis of treatment-related morbidity for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost with a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):286-95.
https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(17)30008-1/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28433432?tool=bestpractice.com
[206]Rodda S, Morris WJ, Hamm J, et al. ASCENDE-RT: an analysis of health-related quality of life for a randomized trial comparing low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost with dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):581-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28581398?tool=bestpractice.com
A braquiterapia isolada pode atingir controle semelhante (5 anos sem progressão) à EBRT associada ao reforço de braquiterapia em pacientes com doença de risco médio, mas com menor toxicidade.[207]Michalski JM, Winter KA, Prestidge BR, et al. Effect of brachytherapy with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: NRG oncology RTOG 0232 randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):4035-44.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01856?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37315297?tool=bestpractice.com
Técnicas de escalonamento de dose direcionado, usando EBRT associada a um micro-reforço na lesão dominante na RNM ou um reforço da radioterapia corporal estereotáxica (SBRT), podem ser uma opção adicional para pacientes selecionados para melhorar o controle bioquímico sem aumentar a toxicidade.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[208]Pasquier D, Nickers P, Peiffert D, et al. A multicenter phase 2 study of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic boost after external beam radiotherapy in intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma: a very long-term analysis of the CKNO-PRO trial. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Aug;54:80-7.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323003567
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545850?tool=bestpractice.com
[209]Draulans C, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with a focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: 5-year efficacy and toxicity in the hypo-FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol. 2024 Dec;201:110568.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39362607?tool=bestpractice.com
[210]Dornisch AM, Zhong AY, Poon DMC, et al. Focal radiotherapy boost to MR-visible tumor for prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2024 Jan 20;42(1):56.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10799816
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244059?tool=bestpractice.com
[211]Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, et al. Focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor in external beam radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer: results from the FLAME randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-96.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.02873?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471548?tool=bestpractice.com
Pode-se também considerar a irradiação nodal pélvica profilática em pacientes altamente selecionados com doença de risco intermediário que estejam sendo submetidos a radioterapia, mas somente se as avaliações de risco adicionais (por exemplo, nomogramas, teste de biomarcador) indicarem doença agressiva.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[212]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
Doença de alto risco ou risco muito alto
Para doença de alto risco, os pacientes apresentam uma ou mais das seguintes características de alto risco, mas não atendem aos critérios de risco muito alto:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
No caso de doença de risco muito alto (localmente avançada), os pacientes apresentam pelo menos dois dos seguintes fatores:
As opções de tratamento para pacientes com doença de alto ou muito alto risco que são assintomáticos e têm uma expectativa de vida ≤5 anos incluem:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observação
TPA (com ou sem EBRT)
EBRT
A observação é a abordagem de costume. No entanto, a TPA e/ou a EBRT podem ser consideradas se forem esperados sintomas ou complicações (por exemplo, hidronefrose) de doenças não tratadas ou metástases no prazo de 5 anos.
As opções de tratamento para pacientes com doença de alto ou muito alto risco que são sintomáticos ou têm uma expectativa de vida >5 anos incluem:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
EBRT (com ou sem reforço com braquiterapia) associada à TPA
EBRT (com ou sem reforço com braquiterapia) associada à TPA (2 anos) associada à abiraterona (para doença de risco muito alto selecionada)
Prostatectomia radical (com dissecção dos linfonodos pélvicos para pacientes saudáveis, sem fixação do tumor na musculatura ou esqueleto pélvico), dependendo da preferência do paciente e da adequação à cirurgia
TPA isolada (para pacientes não elegíveis para cirurgia ou radioterapia devido a comorbidades).
A TPA pode ser administrada antes, durante e/ou após a EBRT, por um total de 1.5 a 3 anos.[213]Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Jul 13;360(9327):103-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12126818?tool=bestpractice.com
[214]Hanks GE, Pajak TF, Porter, et al. Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation after neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):3972-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14581419?tool=bestpractice.com
[215]Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19516032?tool=bestpractice.com
[216]Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE, et al. Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2497-504.
http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/15/2497.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18413638?tool=bestpractice.com
[217]Zapatero A, Guerrero A, Maldonado X, et al. High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25702876?tool=bestpractice.com
[218]Denham JW, Joseph D, Lamb DS, et al. Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): 10-year results from a randomised, phase 3, factorial trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):267-81.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30579763?tool=bestpractice.com
[219]Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin AG, et al. Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):432-441.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.018
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980331?tool=bestpractice.com
[220]Malone S, Roy S, Eapen L, et al. Sequencing of androgen-deprivation therapy with external-beam radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):593-601.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186584
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829912?tool=bestpractice.com
Uma duração reduzida de 1 ano pode ser considerada para pacientes que recebem EBRT associada a reforço de braquiterapia.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[221]Kishan AU, Steigler A, Denham JW, et al. Interplay between duration of androgen deprivation therapy and external beam radiotherapy with or without a brachytherapy boost for optimal treatment of high-risk prostate cancer: a patient-level data analysis of 3 cohorts. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;8(3):e216871.
http://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8778608
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35050303?tool=bestpractice.com
Entretanto, a duração ideal da TPA para esses pacientes permanece controversa.[222]Fosså SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):684-91.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27025586?tool=bestpractice.com
Uma melhora significativa na sobrevida livre de doença é demonstrada por uma maior duração da TPA em pacientes com doença de alto risco.[215]Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19516032?tool=bestpractice.com
[222]Fosså SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):684-91.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27025586?tool=bestpractice.com
[223]Crook J, Ludgate C, Malone S, et al. Final report of multicenter Canadian phase III randomized trial of 3 versus 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before conventional-dose radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):327-33.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18707821?tool=bestpractice.com
[224]Kishan AU, Wang X, Seiferheld W, et al. Association of Gleason grade with androgen deprivation therapy duration and survival outcomes: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):91-6.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3732
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326032?tool=bestpractice.com
O uso de radioterapia combinada com TPA aumenta significativamente alguns sintomas relacionados ao tratamento (por exemplo, dor ao urinar e incômodo urinário e intestinal geral), embora nenhum seja grave. Contudo, devido ao considerável benefício de sobrevida proporcionado pelo tratamento combinado, o aumento do risco de sintomas parece aceitável e tem pouco efeito extra na qualidade de vida após 4 anos, se comparado com TPA isolada.[225]Fransson P, Lund JA, Damber JE, et al. Quality of life in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer given endocrine treatment with or without radiotherapy: 4-year follow-up of SPCG-7/SFUO-3, an open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):370-80.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19286422?tool=bestpractice.com
[226]Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A, et al. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jan 24;373(9660):301-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091394?tool=bestpractice.com
[227]Verhagen PC, Schröder FH, Collette L, et al. Does local treatment of the prostate in advanced and/or lymph node metastatic disease improve efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy? A systematic review. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):261-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20627403?tool=bestpractice.com
[228]Brundage M, Sydes MR, Parulekar WR, et al. Impact of radiotherapy when added to androgen-deprivation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term quality-of-life outcomes from the NCIC CTG PR3/MRC PR07 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2151-7.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477787
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26014295?tool=bestpractice.com
[229]Mason MD, Parulekar WR, Sydes MR, et al. Final report of the intergroup randomized study of combined androgen-deprivation therapy plus radiotherapy versus androgen-deprivation therapy alone in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2143-50.
http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/33/19/2143.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691677?tool=bestpractice.com
[230]Jackson WC, Hartman HE, Dess RT, et al. Addition of androgen-deprivation therapy or brachytherapy boost to external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3024-31.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265327
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32396488?tool=bestpractice.com
A adição da braquiterapia à EBRT (com ou sem TPA) pode oferecer um controle superior da doença, em comparação com EBRT associada à TPA para pacientes com doença de alto risco ou de risco muito alto.[204]Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262473?tool=bestpractice.com
[231]Kishan AU, Cook RR, Ciezki JP, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy boost and disease progression and mortality in patients with Gleason score 9-10 Prostate Cancer. JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0587
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29509865?tool=bestpractice.com
[232]Ennis RD, Hu L, Ryemon SN, et al. Brachytherapy-based radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with similar survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1192-8.
https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9134
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489433?tool=bestpractice.com
Em um estudo randomizado, a EBRT associada à braquiterapia e à TPA melhorou a sobrevida livre de doença bioquímica, em comparação com EBRT associada à TPA. Não foi demonstrado nenhum benefício na sobrevida global.[204]Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262473?tool=bestpractice.com
A radiação com altas doses no tecido da próstata e periprostático é recomendada para pacientes candidatos à radioterapia associada à TPA.[199]Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765406?tool=bestpractice.com
[200]Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):491-500.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635694?tool=bestpractice.com
[201]Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):501-10.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635695?tool=bestpractice.com
[202]Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128107?tool=bestpractice.com
[203]Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160131?tool=bestpractice.com
O aumento da dose com EBRT isolada ou com a adição de reforço de braquiterapia à EBRT melhora o controle bioquímico, mas aumenta a toxicidade.[204]Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262473?tool=bestpractice.com
[205]Rodda S, Tyldesley S, Morris WJ, et al. ASCENDE-RT: an analysis of treatment-related morbidity for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost with a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):286-95.
https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(17)30008-1/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28433432?tool=bestpractice.com
[206]Rodda S, Morris WJ, Hamm J, et al. ASCENDE-RT: an analysis of health-related quality of life for a randomized trial comparing low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost with dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 1;98(3):581-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28581398?tool=bestpractice.com
Técnicas de escalonamento de dose direcionado, usando EBRT associada a um micro-reforço na lesão dominante na RNM ou um reforço de SBRT, podem ser uma opção adicional para pacientes selecionados para melhorar o controle bioquímico sem aumentar a toxicidade.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[208]Pasquier D, Nickers P, Peiffert D, et al. A multicenter phase 2 study of ultrahypofractionated stereotactic boost after external beam radiotherapy in intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma: a very long-term analysis of the CKNO-PRO trial. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Aug;54:80-7.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168323003567
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37545850?tool=bestpractice.com
[209]Draulans C, Haustermans K, Pos FJ, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy with a focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor for intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: 5-year efficacy and toxicity in the hypo-FLAME trial. Radiother Oncol. 2024 Dec;201:110568.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39362607?tool=bestpractice.com
[210]Dornisch AM, Zhong AY, Poon DMC, et al. Focal radiotherapy boost to MR-visible tumor for prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2024 Jan 20;42(1):56.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10799816
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38244059?tool=bestpractice.com
[211]Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, et al. Focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor in external beam radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer: results from the FLAME randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):787-96.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.02873?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471548?tool=bestpractice.com
Pode-se também considerar a irradiação nodal pélvica profilática em pacientes com doença de risco alto ou muito alto que estejam sendo submetidos a radioterapia.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[212]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
A TPA isolada pode ser usada em pacientes que não são bons candidatos à cirurgia ou à radioterapia definitiva devido a comorbidades clínicas. As comorbidades clínicas de exclusão podem incluir a doença inflamatória intestinal ou a irradiação pélvica prévia.[229]Mason MD, Parulekar WR, Sydes MR, et al. Final report of the intergroup randomized study of combined androgen-deprivation therapy plus radiotherapy versus androgen-deprivation therapy alone in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2143-50.
http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/33/19/2143.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691677?tool=bestpractice.com
A TPA de forma intermitente, em vez de contínua, pode ser considerada, embora haja controvérsias quanto a essa abordagem melhorar a qualidade de vida.[233]Crook JM, O'Callaghan CJ, Duncan G, et al. Intermittent androgen suppression for rising PSA level after radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367(10):895-903.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521033
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22931259?tool=bestpractice.com
[234]Henselmans I, Smets EM, Van Laarhoven HW. Decision making about treatment for advanced cancer: influencing wisely? JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1169.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562421?tool=bestpractice.com
[235]Schulman C, Cornel E, Matveev V, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy in patients with relapsing or locally advanced prostate cancer: a phase 3b randomised study (ICELAND). Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):720-7.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228381500977X
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520703?tool=bestpractice.com
A abiraterona (um antiandrogênico de segunda geração) é aprovado para uso na doença metastática. No entanto, o uso off-label em combinação com a TPA (por exemplo, um agonista ou antagonista de LHRH) por 2 anos, associada a EBRT, é recomendado para pacientes selecionados com doença de risco muito alto (não metastática).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[236]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com
[237]Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jun;34(6):557-63.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958590?tool=bestpractice.com
A abiraterona não deve ser usada concomitantemente com outro antiandrogênico (por exemplo, bicalutamida, flutamida) e sempre deve ser administrada com prednisolona ou metilprednisolona (dependendo da formulação da abiraterona). A adição de abiraterona à TPA primária demonstrou melhorar as sobrevidas global e livre de falhas em um estudo randomizado realizado com homens com câncer de próstata localmente avançado (a radioterapia era necessária se os linfonodos fossem negativos, e incentivada se os linfonodos fossem positivos) ou doença metastática.[236]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com
Os dados de sobrevida global para o subgrupo de pacientes com doença não metastática na randomização são imaturos.[236]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com
No entanto, há dados que mostram uma melhoria na sobrevida livre de metástase nesse subgrupo.[238]Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke NW, et al. Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet. 2022 Jan 29;399(10323):447-60.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811484
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953525?tool=bestpractice.com
Terapia de resgate e adjuvante
A terapia de resgate ou adjuvante pode ser necessária após o tratamento definitivo em pacientes com doença localizada ou localmente avançada. O objetivo da terapia de resgate e adjuvante é a cura.
Terapia de resgate após prostatectomia radical
A avaliação de risco (incluindo o uso de nomogramas) deve ser realizada para informar a tomada de decisão após a prostatectomia radical. O ensaio molecular Decipher (classificador genômico de 22 genes) pode ser considerado para auxiliar nas discussões de tomada de decisão, juntamente com informações clínicas e patológicas, nível de PSA e PSADT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[103]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com
[239]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com
[240]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com
[241]Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2035-41.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670394
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513807?tool=bestpractice.com
A terapia de resgate pós-operatória é indicada para pacientes com expectativa de vida >5 anos se houver persistência do PSA (o PSA não cai para níveis indetectáveis) ou recorrência (aumento do PSA previamente indetectável em duas ou mais medições ou para PSA >0.1 nanograma/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[242]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com
A avaliação de metástases à distância deve ser realizada (por exemplo, se o paciente desenvolver sintomas ou o PSA estiver aumentando rapidamente), o que pode incluir imagens ósseas e de tecidos moles e biópsia da próstata à bera do leito. Para pacientes com expectativa de vida ≤5 anos, recomenda-se observação.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
As opções para tratamento de resgate incluem:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[242]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com
EBRT com ou sem TPA, se negativo para recorrência de linfonodos pélvicos e metástases à distância
EBRT com TPA com ou sem abiraterona (associada a prednisolona ou metilprednisolona), se positivo para recorrência de linfonodos pélvicos
EBRT (com ou sem TPA) é a opção de tratamento de escolha para terapia de resgate pós-operatória.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[243]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part II: treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-25.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003891
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421243?tool=bestpractice.com
[244]Carrie C, Hasbini A, de Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-56.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160475?tool=bestpractice.com
[245]Carrie C, Magné N, Burban-Provost P, et al. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1740-1749.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30486-3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629656?tool=bestpractice.com
A combinação da TPA com a EBRT de resgate reduz a probabilidade de progressão e pode melhorar os desfechos de sobrevida em comparação com a EBRT de resgate isolada, mas as decisões (incluindo a duração da TPA) devem ser individualizadas.[243]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part II: treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-25.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003891
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421243?tool=bestpractice.com
[244]Carrie C, Hasbini A, de Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-56.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160475?tool=bestpractice.com
[245]Carrie C, Magné N, Burban-Provost P, et al. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1740-1749.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30486-3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629656?tool=bestpractice.com
[246]Pollack A, Karrison TG, Balogh AG, et al. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node treatment to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 May 14;399(10338):1886-901.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35569466?tool=bestpractice.com
Terapia adjuvante e monitoramento da progressão após prostatectomia radical
As decisões sobre tratamento adjuvante para pacientes com características patológicas adversas ou PSA detectável, mas sem persistência ou recorrência de PSA, devem ser individualizadas com base na avaliação de risco e nas preferências do paciente.
A radioterapia adjuvante pode ser considerada para pacientes com margens positivas, extensão extracapsular [doença pT3], invasão da vesícula seminal ou PSA detectável e sem metástases nos linfonodos.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[247]Bolla M, van Poppel H, Colette L, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2005 Aug 13-19;366(9485):572-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16099293?tool=bestpractice.com
[248]Bolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23084481?tool=bestpractice.com
[249]Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510761
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19167731?tool=bestpractice.com
[250]Hackman G, Taari K, Tammela TL, et al. Randomised trial of adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy alone in prostate cancer patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension. Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):586-95.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375279?tool=bestpractice.com
Pacientes com múltiplas características adversas (independentemente dos níveis de PSA) podem receber EBRT de resgate (com ou sem TPA), assim como pacientes com persistência ou recorrência de PSA no pós-operatório.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Ensaios clínicos randomizados e controlados mostraram que a EBRT de resgate precoce resulta em controle bioquímico e taxa de sobrevida livre de eventos similares, e menor toxicidade geniturinária, em comparação com a EBRT adjuvante imediata.[251]Parker CC, Clarke NW, Cook AD, et al. Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1413-21.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31553-1/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002429?tool=bestpractice.com
[252]Sargos P, Chabaud S, Latorzeff I, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1341-52.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002438?tool=bestpractice.com
[253]Kneebone A, Fraser-Browne C, Duchesne GM, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1331-40.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002437?tool=bestpractice.com
[254]Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-31.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611137
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002431?tool=bestpractice.com
O monitoramento, com tratamento de resgate para persistência ou recorrência do PSA, pode reduzir o tratamento excessivo em comparação com a EBRT adjuvante imediata.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[254]Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-31.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611137
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002431?tool=bestpractice.com
Após uma revisão cuidadosa do equilíbrio entre riscos e benefícios, o monitoramento da progressão (exame físico e PSA a cada 3-6 meses e exames de imagem para sintomas ou aumento do PSA) pode ser uma alternativa à terapia de resgate em pacientes com persistência ou recorrência do PSA após prostatectomia radical (e nos quais os estudos de imagem pós-operatórios para recorrência de linfonodos pélvicos e metástases à distância foram negativos).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[241]Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2035-41.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670394
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513807?tool=bestpractice.com
No entanto, a terapia de resgate é mais eficaz quando administrada em níveis mais baixos de PSA (≥0.1 a 0.2 nanograma/mL) e deve ser considerada para pacientes com PSA crescente detectável e antes que os níveis de PSA atinjam 0.5 nanograma/mL.[242]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-making at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com
[255]Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 pt 1):662-8.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.106
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614333?tool=bestpractice.com
Terapia de resgate após radioterapia primária
A terapia de resgate é indicada para pacientes com expectativa de vida >5 anos se houver recorrência do PSA ou ETR positivo após radioterapia primária.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A recorrência de PSA após radioterapia é definida como aumento de PSA de ≥2 microgramas/L (≥2 nanogramas/mL) acima do nadir de PSA.[256]Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16798415?tool=bestpractice.com
A avaliação para terapia de resgate também pode ser considerada se o PSA estiver aumentando, mas não tiver atingido 2 microgramas/L (2 nanogramas/mL) acima do nadir.
As decisões de tratamento devem ser individualizadas, orientadas pela estratificação de risco; densidade do PSA e imagens ósseas e tecidos moles devem ser realizadas.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[257]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part III: salvage therapy after radiotherapy or focal therapy, pelvic nodal recurrence and oligometastasis, and future directions. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):526-32.
https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003890
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421252?tool=bestpractice.com
Se negativo para linfonodos regionais e metástases à distância, considere biópsia de próstata/vesícula seminal e:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[257]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part III: salvage therapy after radiotherapy or focal therapy, pelvic nodal recurrence and oligometastasis, and future directions. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):526-32.
https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003890
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421252?tool=bestpractice.com
[258]Beyer DC. Permanent brachytherapy as salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1999 Nov;54(5):880-3.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10565751?tool=bestpractice.com
[259]Kimura M, Mouraviev V, Tsivian M, et al. Current salvage methods for recurrent prostate cancer after failure of primary radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(2):191-201.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08715.x
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19583717?tool=bestpractice.com
[260]Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, et al. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):309-16.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385835?tool=bestpractice.com
Monitoramento da progressão ou
TPA (com base na densidade do PSA) ou
Terapia secundária local isolada, que pode incluir:
Prostatectomia de resgate associada a dissecção dos linfonodos pélvicos
Crioterapia de resgate
Re-irradiação (braquiterapia de alta ou baixa dose, ou SBRT)
Ultrassonografia focada de alta intensidade
Se for positivo para linfonodos regionais e negativo para metástases à distância, considere biópsia de próstata/vesícula seminal e:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Monitoramento ou
TPA com ou sem abiraterona (associada a prednisolona ou metilprednisolona) ou
Terapia secundária local (por exemplo, dissecção de linfonodos pélvicos, radiação de linfonodos pélvicos ou re-irradiação [braquiterapia de alta ou baixa dose, ou SBRT]) com ou sem TPA
A observação é recomendada para pacientes com expectativa de vida ≤5 anos.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A braquiterapia de resgate oferece o tratamento preciso de doença localmente recorrente confirmada patologicamente (por exemplo, usando biópsia guiada por RNM) e, portanto, minimiza a toxicidade a órgãos adjacentes. O uso de prostatectomia de resgate e crioterapia de resgate é limitado pelos efeitos adversos relacionados ao tratamento (por exemplo, disfunção erétil).[260]Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, et al. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):309-16.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385835?tool=bestpractice.com
[261]Tefilli MV, Gheiler EL, Tiquert R, et al. Salvage surgery or salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1998 Aug;52(2):224-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9697786?tool=bestpractice.com
[262]Pisters LL, Dinney CP, Pettaway CA, et al. A feasibility study of cryotherapy followed by radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol. 1999 Feb;161(2):509-14.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9915437?tool=bestpractice.com
[263]de Castro Abreu AL, Bahn D, Leslie S, et al. Salvage focal and salvage total cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation therapy. BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):298-307.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826840?tool=bestpractice.com
[264]Li YH, Elshafei A, Agarwal G, et al. Salvage focal prostate cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. Prostate. 2015 Jan;75(1):1-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283814?tool=bestpractice.com
[265]Bahn DK, Lee F, Badalament R, et al. Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: 7-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. 2002 Aug;60(2 suppl 1):3-11.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12206842?tool=bestpractice.com
[266]Cresswell J, Asterling S, Chaudhary M, et al. Third-generation cryotherapy for prostate cancer in the UK: a prospective study of the early outcomes in primary and recurrent disease. BJU Int. 2006 May;97(5):969-74.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06073.x
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16643478?tool=bestpractice.com
Doença não metastática resistente à castração
Pacientes com câncer de próstata não metastático resistente à castração são aqueles com progressão clínica, radiográfica ou bioquímica (PSA) apesar do tratamento com TPA, mas que não apresentam metástases. Esses pacientes apresentam alto risco de desenvolver metástases, particularmente se o PSADT for curto (por exemplo, ≤10 meses). A TPA com um agonista ou antagonista de LHRH deve ser mantida nesses pacientes para manter os níveis séricos de testosterona da castração, mas um tratamento hormonal adicional pode ser adicionado dependendo do PSADT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Se o PSADT for >10 meses, o monitoramento com manutenção da TPA é a opção preferencial. Uma terapia hormonal secundária pode ser adicionada à TPA (se não tiver sido usada anteriormente), embora faltem evidências de benefício de sobrevida. A terapia hormonal secundária pode incluir:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Cetoconazol associado a hidrocortisona
Antiandrogênico de primeira geração (por exemplo, nilutamida, bicalutamida, flutamida)
Corticosteroide (por exemplo, hidrocortisona, prednisolona, dexametasona)
A supressão de antiandrogênico (ou seja, para descartar o efeito da supressão de um antiandrogênico) pode ser uma opção para doença não metastática resistente à castração.[267]Dupont A, Gomez JL, Cusan L, et al. Response to flutamide withdrawal in advanced prostate cancer in progression under combination therapy. J Urol. 1993 Sep;150(3):908-13.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7688437?tool=bestpractice.com
[268]Sartor AO, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426). Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2393-400.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23473
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18383517?tool=bestpractice.com
[269]Small EJ, Halabi S, Dawson NA, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal alone or in combination with ketoconazole in androgen-independent prostate cancer patients: a phase III trial (CALGB 9583). J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1025-33.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020604?tool=bestpractice.com
O cetoconazol pode causar lesão hepática grave e insuficiência adrenal. É contraindicado em pacientes com doença hepática e, se utilizado, deve-se procurar orientação especializada. O fígado e a função adrenal devem ser monitorados antes e durante o tratamento.[270]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: FDA limits usage of Nizoral (ketoconazole) oral tablets due to potentially fatal liver injury and risk of drug interactions and adrenal gland problems. July 2013 [internet publication].
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm362415.htm
Se o PSADT for ≤10 meses, os seguintes antiandrogênicos de segunda geração podem ser adicionados à TPA.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Apalutamida
Darolutamida
Enzalutamida
Estudos randomizados com antiandrogênicos de segunda geração em pacientes com câncer de próstata não metastático resistente à castração e TDPSA ≤10 meses demonstraram melhora na sobrevida global, sobrevida livre de metástases e tempo até progressão em comparação com o placebo, sem comprometer a qualidade de vida.[271]Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1408-18.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29420164?tool=bestpractice.com
[272]Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2465-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949494?tool=bestpractice.com
[273]Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al. Darolutamide in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1235-46.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30763142?tool=bestpractice.com
[274]Saad F, Cella D, Basch E, et al. Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1404-16.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213449?tool=bestpractice.com
[275]Tombal B, Saad F, Penson D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following enzalutamide or placebo in men with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROSPER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Apr;20(4):556-69.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770294?tool=bestpractice.com
[276]Sternberg CN, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide and survival in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2197-206.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469184?tool=bestpractice.com
[277]Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al. Nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and survival with darolutamide. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1040-9.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001342
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905676?tool=bestpractice.com
[278]Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide and overall survival in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):150-8.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228382030628X
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907777?tool=bestpractice.com
[279]Fallah J, Zhang L, Amatya A, et al. Survival outcomes in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: a US Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis of patient-level data from three randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1230-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310904?tool=bestpractice.com
Não se sabe se um benefício similar seria alcançado em homens com TDPSA >10 meses.
Opções alternativas para pacientes com doença não metastática resistente à castração e PSADT ≤10 meses incluem outras opções hormonais secundárias ou supressão do antiandrogênico (conforme descrito para PSADT >10 meses).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[267]Dupont A, Gomez JL, Cusan L, et al. Response to flutamide withdrawal in advanced prostate cancer in progression under combination therapy. J Urol. 1993 Sep;150(3):908-13.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7688437?tool=bestpractice.com
[268]Sartor AO, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426). Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2393-400.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23473
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18383517?tool=bestpractice.com
[269]Small EJ, Halabi S, Dawson NA, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal alone or in combination with ketoconazole in androgen-independent prostate cancer patients: a phase III trial (CALGB 9583). J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1025-33.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020604?tool=bestpractice.com
A TPA isolada ou a observação são recomendadas para pacientes com câncer de próstata assintomático, não metastático e resistente à castração, com expectativa de vida ≤5 anos.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Doença metastática: sensível à castração
Os principais objetivos do tratamento para doença metastática são o prolongamento da sobrevida, além de preservar a qualidade de vida, e a paliação dos sintomas que podem surgir por depósitos de tumores metastáticos.
Pacientes com doença metastática sensível à castração incluem aqueles com doença metastática na apresentação e aqueles que não estejam recebendo TPA quando a doença metastática se desenvolver (isto é, sem terem se submetido à castração).
Deve-se realizar teste genético (linha germinativa e somático) em todos os pacientes com doença metastática (caso não tenha sido realizado previamente) para fundamentar o prognóstico e orientar as decisões relativas ao tratamento, inclusive a elegibilidade para ensaios clínicos e a adequação a novas terapias direcionadas.[280]Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:PO.17.00029.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558263
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28825054?tool=bestpractice.com
[281]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90.
https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com
Consulte Abordagem diagnóstica.
Abordagens terapêuticas para doença metastática sensível à castração
Recomenda-se terapia combinada com TPA (por exemplo, um agonista ou antagonista do LHRH) associada a um antiandrogênico de segunda geração com ou sem docetaxel.[236]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com
[281]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90.
https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com
[282]Morgans AK, Chen YH, Sweeney CJ, et al. Quality of life during treatment with chemohormonal therapy: analysis of E3805 chemohormonal androgen ablation randomized trial in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 10;36(11):1088-95.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522362?tool=bestpractice.com
[283]Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):352-60.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1704174
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578607?tool=bestpractice.com
[284]Chi KN, Protheroe A, Rodríguez-Antolín A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): an international, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):194-206.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326030?tool=bestpractice.com
[285]Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):13-24.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1903307
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150574?tool=bestpractice.com
[286]Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):121-31.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1903835
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31157964?tool=bestpractice.com
[287]Armstrong AJ, Szmulewitz RZ, Petrylak DP, et al. ARCHES: A randomized, phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy with enzalutamide or placebo in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2974-86.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839905
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329516?tool=bestpractice.com
[288]Agarwal N, McQuarrie K, Bjartell A, et al. Health-related quality of life after apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (TITAN): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1518-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578173?tool=bestpractice.com
[289]VanderWeele DJ, Antonarakis ES, Carducci MA, et al. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: clinical decision making in a rapidly evolving landscape of life-prolonging therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2961-67.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.19.01595
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31498754?tool=bestpractice.com
[290]Sathianathen NJ, Oestreich MC, Brown SJ, et al. Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation therapy only for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 12;12(12):CD013245.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013245.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314020?tool=bestpractice.com
[291]Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: final survival analysis of the randomized, double-blind, phase III TITAN study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 10;39(20):2294-303.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914595?tool=bestpractice.com
[292]Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):686-700.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987939?tool=bestpractice.com
[293]Virgo KS, Rumble RB, Talcott J. Initial management of noncastrate advanced, recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;41(20):3652-6.
https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00155
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37011338?tool=bestpractice.com
A EBRT no tumor primário pode ser uma opção para alguns pacientes.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[294]Ali A, Hoyle A, Haran ÁM, et al. Association of bone metastatic burden with survival benefit from prostate radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):555-63.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893550
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33599706?tool=bestpractice.com
[295]Sutera PA, Shetty AC, Hakansson A, et al. Transcriptomic and clinical heterogeneity of metastatic disease timing within metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jul;34(7):605-14.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(23)00657-9/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37164128?tool=bestpractice.com
As decisões sobre o tratamento devem levar em consideração a toxicidade, o volume da doença e o momento das metástases.
As opções de tratamento específicas incluem:[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[237]Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jun;34(6):557-63.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958590?tool=bestpractice.com
[293]Virgo KS, Rumble RB, Talcott J. Initial management of noncastrate advanced, recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;41(20):3652-6.
https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00155
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37011338?tool=bestpractice.com
[296]Hoyle AP, Ali A, James ND, et al. Abiraterone in "high-" and "low-risk" metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):719-28.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447077?tool=bestpractice.com
TPA associada a docetaxel e um dos seguintes: abiraterona, apalutamida, darolutamida ou enzalutamida
TPA associada a um dos seguintes: abiraterona, apalutamida, darolutamida ou enzalutamida
TPA associada a EBRT para o tumor primário isoladamente ou com um dos seguintes: abiraterona, apalutamida, docetaxel ou enzalutamida
A abiraterona deve ser sempre administrada com prednisolona ou metilprednisolona (dependendo da formulação da abiraterona).
Para os pacientes com doença de alto volume (isto é, metástases viscerais e/ou ≥4 metástases ósseas com ≥1 além dos corpos vertebrais e da pelve) ou doença de baixo volume (isto é, doença não regional apenas de linfonodos ou presença de <4 metástases ósseas sem metástase visceral/outras) com metástases sincrônicas, deve-se considerar a TPA associada a um antiandrogênio de segunda geração com docetaxel.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A terapia combinada tripla pode melhorar a sobrevida em comparação com a TPA associada a docetaxel isoladamente, particularmente nos pacientes com doença de alto volume sensível à castração.[297]Fizazi K, Foulon S, Carles J, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022 Apr 30;399(10336):1695-707.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35405085?tool=bestpractice.com
[298]Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F, et al. Darolutamide and survival in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2119115
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35179323?tool=bestpractice.com
[299]Sweeney CJ, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, et al. Testosterone suppression plus enzalutamide versus testosterone suppression plus standard antiandrogen therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (ENZAMET): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Apr;24(4):323-34.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990608?tool=bestpractice.com
[300]Burgess EF, Grigg CM, Boselli D, et al. Enzalutamide and docetaxel in combination with androgen deprivation for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: ENZADA, a phase II trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Apr;23(2):102302.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39903972?tool=bestpractice.com
[301]Wang T, Wang X, Ding G, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of androgen deprivation therapy-based combinations for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2024 Nov;131(8):1363-1377.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39223303?tool=bestpractice.com
Para a doença de baixo volume (isto é, doença não regional apenas dos linfonodos ou presença de <4 metástases ósseas sem metástase visceral/outras) com metástases metacrônicas, a TPA associada a abiraterona, apalutamida ou enzalutamida é preferível .[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[302]Riaz IB, Naqvi SAA, He H, et al. First-line systemic treatment options for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2023 May 1;9(5):635-45.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2802132
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862387?tool=bestpractice.com
Uma melhora da sobrevida foi demonstrada com a EBRT associada à TPA em comparação com a TPA isolada em pacientes com doença sensível à castração de baixo volume.[294]Ali A, Hoyle A, Haran ÁM, et al. Association of bone metastatic burden with survival benefit from prostate radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):555-63.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893550
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33599706?tool=bestpractice.com
[301]Wang T, Wang X, Ding G, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of androgen deprivation therapy-based combinations for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2024 Nov;131(8):1363-1377.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39223303?tool=bestpractice.com
[303]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com
[304]Burdett S, Boevé LM, Ingleby FC, et al. Prostate radiotherapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a STOPCAP systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):115-24.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.003
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30826218?tool=bestpractice.com
[305]Boevé LMS, Hulshof MCCM, Vis AN, et al. Effect on survival of androgen deprivation therapy alone compared to androgen deprivation therapy combined with concurrent radiation therapy to the prostate in patients with primary bone metastatic prostate cancer in a prospective randomised clinical trial: data from the HORRAD trial. Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):410-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30266309?tool=bestpractice.com
O hipofracionamento moderado e o ultra-hipofracionamento são as abordagens de primeira escolha para a EBRT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[303]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com
Geralmente, a TPA é administrada de maneira contínua, mas a TPA intermitente pode ser considerada se ocorrerem efeitos adversos com a TPA contínua.[72]Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1119-34.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39898-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32593798?tool=bestpractice.com
[306]Conti PD, Atallah AN, Arruda H, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression for prostatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005009.
http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005009.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17943832?tool=bestpractice.com
[307]Abrahamsson PA. Potential benefits of intermittent androgen suppression therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):49-59.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19683858?tool=bestpractice.com
[308]Botrel TE, Clark O, dos Reis RB, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2014 Jan 25;14:9.
https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-9
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460605?tool=bestpractice.com
[309]Magnan S, Zarychanski R, Pilote L, et al. Intermittent vs continuous androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1261-9.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2895
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378418?tool=bestpractice.com
[310]Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1314-25.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1212299
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23550669?tool=bestpractice.com
A TPA isolada não é recomendada para os pacientes com doença metastática sensível à castração, a menos que o tratamento combinado seja claramente contraindicado.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A orquiectomia bilateral é uma opção para os pacientes com doença metastática sensível à castração, mas raramente é usada.
Um nível de PSA ≤0.2 microgramas/L (≤0.2 nanogramas/mL) após 7 meses de TPA é um forte preditor de sobrevida global mais longa em pacientes com doença metastática sensível à castração.[311]Harshman LC, Chen YH, Liu G, et al. Seven-month prostate-specific antigen is prognostic in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation with or without docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):376-82.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805480
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261442?tool=bestpractice.com
Doença oligometastática
Geralmente, considera-se que pacientes com 1-5 lesões metastáticas têm doença oligometastática, embora não haja definição acordada para esse estado patológico.[312]Rao A, Vapiwala N, Schaeffer EM, et al. Oligometastatic prostate cancer: a shrinking subset or an opportunity for cure? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:309-20.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/EDBK_239041
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31099652?tool=bestpractice.com
O tratamento padrão para a doença oligometastática é semelhante ao da doença de baixa carga metastática.
A terapia focal com SBRT pode ser uma opção para pacientes com doença oligometastática (quando o objetivo é a ablação direcionada por metástase) ou para pacientes com progressão oligometastática (quando o objetivo é a sobrevida livre de progressão).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[313]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com
[314]Ost P, Reynders D, Decaestecker K, et al. Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):446-53.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240541?tool=bestpractice.com
Um estudo randomizado de SBRT em cânceres oligometastáticos relatou melhora na sobrevida global e na sobrevida livre de progressão em pacientes que receberam SBRT, em comparação com cuidados paliativos padrão.[315]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com
[316]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus standard of care palliative treatment in patients with oligometastatic cancers (SABR-COMET): a randomised, phase 2, open-label trial. Lancet. 2019 May 18;393(10185):2051-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30982687?tool=bestpractice.com
A abordagem de tratamento ideal para o manejo da doença oligometastática não está clara.
Doença metastática: resistente à castração
Os principais objetivos do tratamento para doença metastática são o prolongamento da sobrevida, além de preservar a qualidade de vida, e a paliação dos sintomas que podem surgir por depósitos de tumores metastáticos.
Pacientes com doença metastática resistente à castração são aqueles que desenvolvem doença metastática apesar de atingir níveis de castração de testosterona com TPA primária.
Testes tumorais para mutações do reparo de recombinação homóloga somática (HRR), instabilidade de microssatélite (IMS)/deficiência no reparo de erro de pareamento (MMR) e carga mutacional tumoral (TMB) devem ser realizados nos pacientes com doença metastática resistente à castração (se não tiverem sido feitos anteriormente) para informar o prognóstico e orientar as decisões de tratamento, incluindo elegibilidade para ensaios clínicos e adequação para terapias direcionadas novas.[280]Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:PO.17.00029.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558263
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28825054?tool=bestpractice.com
[281]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90.
https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com
A reavaliação dos testes somáticos pode ser considerada se tiver sido realizada anteriormente.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A testagem da linha germinativa para mutações HRR é recomendada se não tiver sido feita anteriormente. Consulte Abordagem para o diagnóstico.
As opções de tratamento para os pacientes com doença metastática resistente à castração se expandiram rapidamente. O sequenciamento ideal das terapias após o docetaxel ou cabazitaxel e/ou terapia antiandrogênica de segunda geração não está claro. Estudos podem ajudar a orientar as decisões.[317]Khalaf DJ, Annala M, Taavitsainen S, et al. Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1730-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727538?tool=bestpractice.com
[318]Wallis CJD, Klaassen Z, Jackson WC, et al. Olaparib vs cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110950.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10950
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028551?tool=bestpractice.com
[319]Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al. [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):797-804.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33581798?tool=bestpractice.com
Opções de tratamento inicial para a doença metastática resistente à castração
As decisões de tratamento devem levar em consideração os objetivos e preferências do paciente, as exposições anteriores a tratamentos, a presença ou ausência de sintomas, a capacidade funcional, a localização e o número de metástases, os potenciais efeitos adversos e a presença de certos biomarcadores.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
A TPA deve ser continuada para manter os níveis de castração de testosterona em pacientes com doença metastática resistente à castração. Os pacientes devem ser rigorosamente monitorados para progressão, e os tratamentos devem ser adicionais de maneira sequencial.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Para pacientes sem tratamento prévio com terapia antiandrogênica de segunda geração (abiraterona, enzalutamida, darolutamida ou apalutamida), a TPA pode ser combinada com uma das seguintes opções:[320]Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fizazi K, et al; COU-AA-302 Investigators. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):152-60.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25601341?tool=bestpractice.com
[321]Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al; PREVAIL Investigators. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):424-33.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418931
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24881730?tool=bestpractice.com
[322]Basch E, Loblaw DA, Oliver TK, et al. Systemic therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20;32(30):3436-48.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876355
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199761?tool=bestpractice.com
[323]Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R, et al. Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: the STRIVE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2098-106.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811535?tool=bestpractice.com
[324]Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf D, et al. Enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: extended analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study. Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):151-4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27477525?tool=bestpractice.com
[325]Armstrong AJ, Lin P, Tombal B, et al. Five-year survival prediction and safety outcomes with enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from the PREVAIL trial. Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):347-57.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283820303298
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527692?tool=bestpractice.com
[326]Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1513-20.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa041318
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15470214?tool=bestpractice.com
[327]Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15470213?tool=bestpractice.com
[328]de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888992?tool=bestpractice.com
[329]de Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, et al. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-18.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911206
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566937?tool=bestpractice.com
[330]Fizazi K, Kramer G, Eymard JC, et al. Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-25.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926841?tool=bestpractice.com
[331]Berthold DR, Pond GR, Soban F, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 10;26(2):242-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18182665?tool=bestpractice.com
Abiraterona (com prednisolona ou metilprednisolona)
Enzalutamida
Docetaxel associado a prednisolona (se não houver uso prévio do docetaxel)
Cabazitaxel associado a prednisolona (se houver uso prévio de docetaxel)
Para os pacientes com progressão após o tratamento com terapia antiandrogênica de segunda geração sem tratamento prévio com docetaxel, o docetaxel associado a prednisolona pode ser adicionado à TPA.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Se o paciente tiver uma mutação BRCA1 ou BRCA2, qualquer um dos inibidores da poli(ADP-ribose) polimerase (PARP), olaparibe ou rucaparibe, pode ser considerado como opção alternativa nesse cenário.[332]Mateo J, Porta N, Bianchini D, et al. Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):162-74.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806540?tool=bestpractice.com
[333]de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2091-202.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911440
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343890?tool=bestpractice.com
[334]Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2345-57.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2022485
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955174?tool=bestpractice.com
[335]Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN, et al. Rucaparib or physician's choice in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 23;388(8):719-32.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2214676?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795891?tool=bestpractice.com
Para os pacientes com progressão após tratamento com terapia antiandrogênica de segunda geração e tratamento prévio com docetaxel, o cabazitaxel associado a prednisolona pode ser adicionado à TPA.[328]de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888992?tool=bestpractice.com
[329]de Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, et al. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-18.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911206
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566937?tool=bestpractice.com
[330]Fizazi K, Kramer G, Eymard JC, et al. Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-25.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926841?tool=bestpractice.com
[336]Eisenberger M, Hardy-Bessard AC, Kim CS, et al. Phase III study comparing a reduced dose of cabazitaxel (20 mg/m(2)) and the currently approved dose (25 mg/m(2)) in postdocetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant postate cancer-PROSELICA. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3198-206.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1076?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28809610?tool=bestpractice.com
A reintrodução do docetaxel é uma opção adicional para os pacientes com doença sensível à castração que tiverem progredido com uma terapia anterior com docetaxel e antiandrogênio de segunda geração.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Os pacientes que mostrarem sinais de progressão ao tomar abiraterona associada a prednisolona podem se beneficiar de uma troca da prednisolona por dexametasona.[337]Romero-Laorden N, Lozano R, Jayaram A, et al. Phase II pilot study of the prednisone to dexamethasone switch in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with limited progression on abiraterone plus prednisone (SWITCH study). Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(9):1052-9.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219494
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131546?tool=bestpractice.com
[338]Fenioux C, Louvet C, Charton E, et al. Switch from abiraterone plus prednisone to abiraterone plus dexamethasone at asymptomatic PSA progression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):300-6.
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.14511
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099821?tool=bestpractice.com
Opções de tratamento adicionais para a doença metastática resistente à castração
Os seguintes tratamentos podem ser considerados para pacientes selecionados com doença metastática resistente à castração. O sequenciamento ideal é desconhecido; os pacientes podem tentar qualquer uma dessas opções, se houver indicação.
Cuidados de suporte
Cuidados de suporte devem ser considerados para controlar as complicações e sintomas relacionados à doença metastática.
Os pacientes com doença resistente à castração que apresentam metástases ósseas devem receber tratamento para prevenir eventos relacionados ao esqueleto. Consulte Complicações.
A radioterapia sistêmica com os emissores de partículas beta estrôncio-89 ou samário-153 pode ser considerada para paliação nos pacientes com metástases ósseas sintomáticas sem metástase visceral. A sua utilização é puramente paliativa e foi largamente substituída pelo rádio-223, que confere uma vantagem de sobrevida.
A radioterapia em doses paliativas pode ser aplicada nos locais de metástase óssea dolorosa. A radiação pode incluir um único tratamento ou um ciclo de 1 ou 2 semanas, dependendo da toxicidade do tecido normal e da comodidade do paciente.[364]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7.
https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com
Os estudos não mostram uma diferença consistente entre os esquemas para o controle da dor, mas alguns relataram taxas mais elevadas de nova irradiação em pacientes que receberam esquemas de fração única (embora o motivo para isso não esteja claro).[364]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7.
https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com
[365]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com
[366]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com
[367]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com
A SBRT pode ser considerada em vez da radioterapia paliativa convencional para alguns pacientes com metástases ósseas dolorosas (por exemplo, com capacidade funcional de 0 a 2 do Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, sem sintomas neurológicos e que não serão submetidos a cirurgia).[364]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7.
https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com
[368]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com
Radiação também pode ser aplicada na pelve, se não tratada previamente, em doses paliativas para aliviar sintomas obstrutivos ou sangramento.
Faltam evidências para orientar o uso da SBRT combinada com terapia direcionada e imunoterapia.[369]Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, et al. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e121-32.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858728?tool=bestpractice.com