Patent foramen ovale
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
asymptomatic with low risk of thrombotic event (not in high risk occupation)
education and observation
Patients with a small PFO and without a prior history of cerebrovascular accident do not require intervention. These patients are without an atrial septal aneurysm or have crossover of very few (<10) microbubbles on contrast injection. The PFO is generally an incidental finding. There is a low risk of paradoxical embolism and the risk-benefit ratio does not favor treatment. Education and observation for any evidence of a paradoxical embolism is all that is required.
asymptomatic with high risk of thrombotic event (not in high-risk occupation)
observation
Factors denoting high risk of thrombosis are large PFOs with a large number of microbubble crossovers and/or an associated atrial septal aneurysm.[26]Handke M, Harloff A, Olschewski M, et al. Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2262-8. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa071422?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18046029?tool=bestpractice.com [27]Overell JR, Bone I, Lees KR. Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurology. 2000 Oct 24;55(8):1172-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11071496?tool=bestpractice.com
Conservative treatment with education and observation for any evidence of a paradoxical embolism may be appropriate care in selected patients.
anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Initiation of antiplatelet therapy should be considered, especially in patients with larger PFO defects and associated atrial septal aneurysms.[25]Kuijpers T, Spencer FA, Siemieniuk RAC, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy alone for management of cryptogenic stroke? A clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018 Jul 25;362:k2515. https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k2515.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045912?tool=bestpractice.com
Usual recommendation is aspirin or clopidogrel rather than warfarin, unless anticoagulation is indicated. There are no clear guidelines on combined usage, although a combination is often used in patients with concomitant coronary artery disease.
Warfarin may be indicated in patients with atrial fibrillation or those with recurrent stroke despite being on antiplatelet therapy. The target international normalized ratio (INR) is 1.5 to 2.0.
Primary options
aspirin: 75-325 mg orally once daily
OR
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
Secondary options
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
cryptogenic stroke
percutaneous closure
In patients ages 18 to 60 years with established cryptogenic stroke and presence of PFO, it is reasonable to proceed with a percutaneous transcatheter PFO closure procedure along with postoperative antiplatelet therapy to prevent recurrent ischemic events, rather than antiplatelet therapy alone.[25]Kuijpers T, Spencer FA, Siemieniuk RAC, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy alone for management of cryptogenic stroke? A clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018 Jul 25;362:k2515. https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k2515.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045912?tool=bestpractice.com
The benefit with PFO closure appears stronger in patients with high-risk features (i.e., large PFO, atrial septal aneurysm).[22]Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-467. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/STR.0000000000000375 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024117?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with low-risk anatomic features of PFO, further risk stratification using the risk of paradoxical embolism (RoPE) score might be beneficial in identifying patients with PFO-related cryptogenic stroke. Factors in the score indicative of a higher likelihood of a PFO-related stroke are the absence of traditional risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, cortical infarct on imaging, and younger age.[28]Messé SR, Gronseth GS, Kent DM, et al. Practice advisory update summary: patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2020 May 19;94(20):876-85. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526671 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350058?tool=bestpractice.com
Prior to percutaneous closure, patients receive antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation. After PFO closure, antiplatelet therapy is typically recommended. For patients who have indications for chronic anticoagulation, PFO device closure is not indicated.
The PFO procedure is associated with a benefit of an absolute recurrent stroke risk reduction of 3.4% at 5 years, with a periprocedural complication risk of 3.9% and increased absolute rate of nonperiprocedural atrial fibrillation of 0.33% per year.[28]Messé SR, Gronseth GS, Kent DM, et al. Practice advisory update summary: patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2020 May 19;94(20):876-85. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7526671 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32350058?tool=bestpractice.com
Evidence is not as strong for PFO closure in patients younger than 18 years or older than 60 years with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. Guidelines support a multidisciplinary approach with involvement of neurology and cardiology teams, along with shared decision making with the patient, in formulating a management plan.[22]Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-467. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/STR.0000000000000375 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024117?tool=bestpractice.com [23]National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia). Clinical guidelines for stroke management. 2021 [internet publication]. https://informme.org.au/guidelines/clinical-guidelines-for-stroke-management
anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
Medical therapy with full anticoagulation is preferred over antiplatelet therapy to decrease recurrent ischemic events in patients with cryptogenic stroke who are not a candidate for a PFO closure procedure. This approach is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. Careful evaluation of the bleeding profile of the patient and shared decision making is recommended in selecting antiplatelet versus anticoagulation therapy.[25]Kuijpers T, Spencer FA, Siemieniuk RAC, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy alone for management of cryptogenic stroke? A clinical practice guideline. BMJ. 2018 Jul 25;362:k2515. https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k2515.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045912?tool=bestpractice.com
If warfarin is used, the target international normalized ratio (INR) is 1.5 to 2.0.
Primary options
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
Secondary options
aspirin: 75-325 mg orally once daily
OR
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
high-risk occupation
anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
High-risk occupations include deep sea divers, high altitude pilots, and astronauts.
Treatment with anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy is generally recommended, along with behavioral prevention of decompression sickness.[29]Pristipino C, Germonpré P, Toni D, et al. European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. Part II - Decompression sickness, migraine, arterial deoxygenation syndromes and select high-risk clinical conditions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 21;42(16):1545-53. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/16/1545/6122426?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507260?tool=bestpractice.com
If warfarin is used, the target international normalized ratio (INR) is 1.5 to 2.0.
Primary options
aspirin: 75-325 mg orally once daily
OR
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
Secondary options
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
percutaneous closure
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Percutaneous closure of the PFO should be considered on an individual basis for professional scuba divers in whom behavioral prevention methods are not effective in preventing symptoms of decompression sickness.[30]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK). Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for the secondary prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism in divers. Dec 2010 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg371 It is unknown whether astronauts need to undergo closure.
Open surgery is used if the PFO is discovered during open heart surgery for another indication such as bypass or valvular surgery.
Prior to percutaneous closure, patients receive antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation. After PFO closure, antiplatelet therapy is typically recommended. For patients who have indications for chronic anticoagulation, PFO device closure is not indicated.
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer