Trials involving boys suggest circumcision may be preventive, especially for those at increased risk (e.g., high-grade vesicoureteric reflux).[36]Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child. 2005 Aug;90(8):853-8.
https://adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/853.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15890696?tool=bestpractice.com
However, other studies have suggested that the evidence for circumcision preventing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in anatomically normal boys is weak, that there are pros and cons to circumcision, and the decision to do so should be made on an individual basis.[38]Dave S. Circumcision overview. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 Jan-Feb;11(1-2suppl1):S63.
https://cuaj.ca/index.php/journal/article/view/4451
[39]Deacon M, Muir G. What is the medical evidence on non-therapeutic child circumcision? Int J Impot Res. 2023 May;35(3):256-63.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997197?tool=bestpractice.com
No clear recommendations exist for adult men. In uncircumcised males, routine retraction of the foreskin during urination with proper hygiene reduces the risk of UTI.[37]Holzman SA, Chamberlin JD, Davis-Dao CA, et al. Retractable foreskin reduces urinary tract infections in infant boys with vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Apr;17(2):209.e1-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33516608?tool=bestpractice.com
[40]Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Care of the uncircumcised penis. 2025 [internet publication].
https://www.chop.edu/conditions-diseases/care-uncircumcised-penis#:~:text=As%20long%20as%20the%20foreskin,the%20glans%20of%20the%20penis
A catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) is a UTI that has occurred when a hospitalized patient has had an indwelling catheter for more than two consecutive days.[41]National Healthcare Safety Network. Urinary tract infection (catheter-associated urinary tract infection [CAUTI] and non-catheter-associated urinary tractinfection [UTI]) events. Jan 2025 [internet publication].
https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/7psccauticurrent.pdf
In patients with neurogenic bladder requiring catheterization, clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is believed to cause fewer urinary tract complications compared with urethral indwelling catheterizations.[42]Mukai S, Shigemura K, Nomi M, et al. Retrospective study for risk factors for febrile UTI in spinal cord injury patients with routine concomitant intermittent catheterization in outpatient settings. Spinal Cord. 2016 Jan;54(1):69-72.
https://www.nature.com/articles/sc2015170
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458969?tool=bestpractice.com
Hydrophilic-coated catheters have also been found to be beneficial for reducing CAUTI rates.[2]European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urological infections. Mar 2025 [internet publication].
https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urological-infections
One meta-analysis of seven studies investigating randomized controlled trials comparing hydrophilic coated to peripheral venous catheter (standard) for IC, found a statistically lower risk ratio (0.84) for the frequency of UTI in the hydrophilic catheter group.[43]Rognoni C, Tarricone R. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses. BMC Urol. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):4.
https://bmcurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12894-016-0191-1
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28073354?tool=bestpractice.com
Silver- or antibiotic-coated catheters also decrease catheter-associated bacteriuria but have not conclusively been shown to prevent UTI; therefore, removal or avoidance of the catheter offers the best prevention.[34]Huang W, Wann S, Lin S, et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units can be reduced by prompting physicians to remove unnecessary catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Nov;25(11):974-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15566033?tool=bestpractice.com
[44]Lam TB, Omar M, Fisher E, et al. Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 23;(9):CD004013.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004013.pub4/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25248140?tool=bestpractice.com
[45]Pickard R, Lam T, MacLennan G, et al. Antimicrobial catheters for reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infection in adults requiring short-term catheterisation in hospital: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Dec 1;380(9857):1927-35.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23134837?tool=bestpractice.com
[46]Ricardo SIC, Anjos IIL, Monge N, et al. A glance at antimicrobial strategies to prevent catheter-associated medical infections. ACS Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 11;6(12):3109-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33245664?tool=bestpractice.com
The quality and applicability of evidence regarding prophylaxis for use of several pharmacologic and nonpharmaceutical treatment strategies (e.g., encouraging cranberry intake) in clinical practice for different patient groups is debatable, as there are significant gaps in understanding for particular subgroups of men with UTI. Trial of these therapies should never preclude investigation for structural abnormality in the male urinary tract.[47]Williams G, Hahn D, Stephens JH, et al. Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 17;4(4):CD001321.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001321.pub6/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37068952?tool=bestpractice.com
[48]Jepson RG, Craig JC. A systematic review of the evidence for cranberries and blueberries in UTI prevention. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007 Jun;51(6):738-45.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17492798?tool=bestpractice.com
[49]Cruz F, Dambros M, Naber KG, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infections: Uro-Vaxom, a new alternative. Eur Urol Suppl. 2009;8:762-8.[50]Naber KG, Cho YH, Matsumoto T, et al. Immunoactive prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections: a meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Feb;33(2):111-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18963856?tool=bestpractice.com