Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
acute presentation
antiplatelet therapy
Aspirin is indicated immediately for all patients suspected of having an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) unless contraindicated or already taken.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com Healthcare personnel providing prehospital emergency services should give a single loading dose of aspirin to patients presenting with chest pain, suspected of having ACS unless contraindicated or already taken by the patient.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com High-dose aspirin is associated with an increased risk of bleeding when compared with low-dose aspirin and in the absence of improved outcomes.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com
All patients should be given dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor. If the patient is intolerant of aspirin or it is otherwise contraindicated, a P2Y12 inhibitor can be given alone, but two different P2Y12 inhibitors should not be given together. P2Y12 inhibitors can reduce mortality and morbidity, but they may be associated with increased bleeding risk.[115]Motovska Z, Kala P. Benefits and risks of clopidogrel use in patients with coronary artery disease: evidence from randomized studies and registries. Clin Ther. 2008;30 Pt 2:2191-202. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19281914?tool=bestpractice.com [116]Squizzato A, Bellesini M, Takeda A, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus aspirin alone for preventing cardiovascular events. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 14;(12):CD005158. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005158.pub4/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29240976?tool=bestpractice.com Ticagrelor and prasugrel are associated with reduced ischemic events compared to clopidogrel, and recommended in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), although there is also an increased bleeding risk with these drugs.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Mahaffey KW, Held C, Wojdyla DM, et al; PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor effects on myocardial infarction and the impact of event adjudication in the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 22;63(15):1493-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24561148?tool=bestpractice.com [118]Pollack CV Jr, Davoudi F, Diercks DB, et al; PLATO Investigators. Relative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel as a function of time to invasive management in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the PLATO trial. Clin Cardiol. 2017 Jun;40(6):390-8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/clc.22733 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28598510?tool=bestpractice.com [119]Varenhorst C, Alström U, Braun OÖ, et al. Causes of mortality with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1762-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24957530?tool=bestpractice.com [120]Bavishi C, Panwar S, Messerli FH, et al. Meta-analysis of comparison of the newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) to clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 1;116(5):809-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26119655?tool=bestpractice.com [121]Navarese EP, Khan SU, Kołodziejczak M, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of oral P2Y(12) inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome: network meta-analysis of 52 816 patients from 12 randomized trials. Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):150-60. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7489363 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32468837?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Turgeon RD, Koshman SL, Youngson E, et al. Association of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel with major adverse coronary events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Mar 1;180(3):420-8. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6990835 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31930361?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Ruiz-Nodar JM, Esteve-Pastor MA, Rivera-Caravaca JM, et al. One-year efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from a prospective and multicentre ACHILLES registry. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;86(6):1052-61. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7256120 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31912949?tool=bestpractice.com Ticagrelor is recommended for patients on either invasive or noninvasive strategies.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 Prasugrel is recommended only for patients on an invasive strategy.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [124]Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Lahu S, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1121-9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246339 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190967?tool=bestpractice.com Clopidogrel is recommended for patients who cannot receive ticagrelor or prasugrel, and in older patients (≥70 years).[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [125]Gimbel M, Qaderdan K, Willemsen L, et al. Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334703?tool=bestpractice.com Prasugrel is contraindicated in patients with a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and its use is not recommended in patients ≥75 years of age or in patients with low body weight (<60 kg) due to increased bleeding risk (though dose reductions may mitigate this risk); therefore, ticagrelor is often more widely used.[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com [126]O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):e362-425. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6 [127]Goodwin MM, Desilets AR, Willett KC. Thienopyridines in acute coronary syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Feb;45(2):207-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304037?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Menichelli M, Neumann FJ, Ndrepepa G, et al. Age- and weight-adapted dose of prasugrel versus standard dose of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes : results from a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):436-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687741?tool=bestpractice.com
Routine pretreatment with a P2Y12 inhibitor is not recommended if early invasive management is planned and coronary anatomy is not known.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [132]Dawson LP, Chen D, Dagan M, et al. Assessment of pretreatment with oral P2Y12 Inhibitors and cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134322. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8605486 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34797371?tool=bestpractice.com For patients receiving chronic clopidogrel therapy prior to presentation, there is some evidence to suggest decreased periprocedural MI with clopidogrel reloading at the time of PCI.[133]Patti G, Pasceri V, Mangiacapra F, et al; ARMYDA-8 RELOAD-ACS Investigators. Efficacy of clopidogrel reloading in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention during chronic clopidogrel therapy (from the Antiplatelet Therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty [ARMYDA-8 RELOAD-ACS] trial). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;112(2):162-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23601577?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
conservative strategy
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
ticagrelor: 180 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
-- AND --
prasugrel: 60 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 10 mg once daily
or
ticagrelor: 180 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
Secondary options
conservative strategy
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
clopidogrel: 300 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
clopidogrel: 600 mg orally as a loading dose (or 300 mg prior to PCI and 300 mg at time of PCI), followed by 75 mg once daily
OR
aspirin-allergic patients
ticagrelor: conservative strategy or PCI planned: 180 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
or
clopidogrel: conservative strategy: 300 mg orally as loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily; PCI planned: 600 mg orally as a loading dose (or 300 mg prior to PCI and 300 mg at time of PCI), followed by 75 mg once daily
or
prasugrel: PCI planned: 60 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 10 mg once daily
oxygen
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
All patients require oxygen saturation measurement using pulse oximetry.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com Guidelines recommend supplemental oxygen therapy only in patients with an arterial oxygen saturation <90%, respiratory distress, or other high-risk features for hypoxemia.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210
pain relief
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Pain relief is indicated in the initial management of all patients.
Sublingual nitroglycerin reduces myocardial oxygen demand and enhances myocardial oxygen delivery. Nitroglycerin is contraindicated if there is hypotension, marked bradycardia or tachycardia, known severe aortic stenosis, right ventricular infarction, and/or a history of recent phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use (e.g., sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil) for erectile dysfunction in the last 24-48 hours.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 Intravenous nitroglycerin is indicated if 3 doses of sublingual nitroglycerin have not relieved the pain.
Morphine should be added early if nitroglycerin is not sufficient. Morphine, in addition to its analgesic and anxiolytic properties, has hemodynamic effects that are potentially beneficial in unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
Morphine causes vasodilation and may produce reductions in heart rate (through increased vagal tone) and systolic BP to further reduce myocardial oxygen demand.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com If nitroglycerin is not effective or is contraindicated, morphine can be given as an alternative in the absence of any contraindications. Limited data (largely observational studies) investigate morphine use for NSTEMI with evidence of potential safety concerns, thus it should be used with caution.[134]Meine TJ, Roe MT, Chen AY, et al; CRUSADE Investigators. Association of intravenous morphine use and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative. Am Heart J. 2005 Jun;149(6):1043-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15976786?tool=bestpractice.com One randomized, double-blind trial found that morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction.[135]Kubica J, Adamski P, Ostrowska M, et al. Morphine delays and attenuates ticagrelor exposure and action in patients with myocardial infarction: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled IMPRESSION trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):245-52. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/37/3/245/2467204 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26491112?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
nitroglycerin: 400-800 micrograms (1-2 sprays) every 5 minutes, maximum 3 doses
OR
nitroglycerin: 0.3 to 0.6 mg sublingually every 5 minutes, maximum 3 doses
Secondary options
nitroglycerin: 5 micrograms/min intravenously initially, increase by 5-20 micrograms/min increments every 3-5 minutes, maximum 200 micrograms/min
Tertiary options
morphine sulfate: 2-5 mg intravenously every 5-30 minutes when required
and
nitroglycerin: 5 micrograms/min intravenously initially, increase by 5-20 micrograms/min increments every 3-5 minutes, maximum 200 micrograms/min
OR
morphine sulfate: 2-5 mg intravenously every 5-30 minutes when required
beta-blocker
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Oral beta-blockers should be started as soon as a patient with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction is hemodynamically stable unless there are contraindications (e.g., heart block, active asthma), as they decrease infarct size and reduce mortality.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [138]Peck KY, Andrianopoulos N, Dinh D, et al. Role of beta blockers following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. Heart. 2021 May;107(9):728-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887736?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment should begin within a few days of the event, if not initiated acutely, and should be continued indefinitely, especially in patients with reduced left ventricular function.
Evidence suggests that a beta-blocker may reduce the short-term risk of a reinfarction and the long-term risk of all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).[139]Safi S, Sethi NJ, Nielsen EE, et al. Beta-blockers for suspected or diagnosed acute myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 17;12(12):CD012484. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6915833 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31845756?tool=bestpractice.com [140]Kim J, Kang D, Park H, et al. Long-term β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2020 Oct 1;41(37):3521-9. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/37/3521/5857797 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542362?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Safi S, Sethi NJ, Korang SK, et al. Beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):CD012565. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8570410 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34739733?tool=bestpractice.com Randomized trials with threatened or evolving MI have shown lower rates of progression to MI with beta-blocker treatment.[142]American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Health Association, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, et al. Fact sheet: beta-blockers for acute myocardial infarction. April 2005 [internet publication]. https://archive.ahrq.gov/clinic/commitfact.htm [143]American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Health Association, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, et al. Practice advisory: commitment to respond to COMMIT/CCS-2 trial beta blocker use for myocardial infarction (MI) within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Apr 2005 [internet publication]. https://archive.ahrq.gov/clinic/commitadvisory.htm Comparative studies between the various beta-blockers in the acute setting are lacking. However, beta-blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (e.g., metoprolol, propranolol, and atenolol) are preferred for initial management.
Selection of a long-term beta-blocker often depends on the clinician's familiarity with the agent. The goal resting heart rate is 50-60 bpm.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com [187]Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Aug 14;50(7):e1-157. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0735-1097(07)00511-6 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17692738?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
metoprolol tartrate: 50-100 mg orally (regular-release) twice daily
OR
atenolol: 50-100 mg/day orally
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 180-320 mg/day orally (immediate-release) given in 3-4 divided doses
calcium-channel blocker
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Calcium-channel blockers can be given to patients with continuing or recurrent ischemic symptoms after being given adequate nitrate and beta-blocker therapy, or those who cannot tolerate beta-blockers.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com Although they are often used, they are no more effective than control at reducing mortality or myocardial infarction rates in people with unstable angina.
Patients treated acutely with a calcium-channel blocker for acute angina do not need to continue these drugs, provided there is no recurrent angina on drug cessation or another indication for these drugs (i.e., hypertension). These drugs can be tapered after 24 hours at the discretion of the clinician.
Short-acting dihydropyridines (e.g., nifedipine) should be avoided in the absence of adequate beta-blocker therapy because they may be associated with adverse outcomes.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Verapamil or diltiazem should be avoided in severe left ventricular dysfunction.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
diltiazem: 30-90 mg orally (immediate-release) four times daily
OR
verapamil: 80-120 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily
OR
amlodipine: 5-10 mg orally once daily
assess need for invasive or conservative approach
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Urgent and immediate angiography is indicated if the patient is clinically unstable or has any very high-risk features: ongoing or recurrent pain despite treatment, hemodynamic instability (low blood pressure or shock) or cardiogenic shock, recurrent dynamic ECG changes suggestive of ischemia, a life-threatening arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or cardiac arrest after presentation, or mechanical complications such as new onset mitral regurgitation.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com
In the absence of very high-risk features or clinical instability, the decision to pursue an invasive approach or medical management is made on an individual basis.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [86]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Acute coronary syndromes. Nov 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng185 [188]Topol EJ. A guide to therapeutic decision-making in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 19;41(4 suppl S):S123-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12644350?tool=bestpractice.com Guidelines recommend an early invasive approach leading to revascularization in patients who are at intermediate or high risk of ischemic events, and a routine invasive or selective invasive approach with further risk stratification in patients with low risk of further adverse cardiac events.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com High-risk patients should undergo early (12-24 hours) coronary angiography and angiographically directed revascularization if possible unless patients have serious comorbidities, including cancer or end-stage liver disease, or clinically obvious contraindications, including acute or chronic (chronic kidney disease 4 or higher) renal failure, multiorgan failure, or medical frailty.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [86]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Acute coronary syndromes. Nov 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng185 [89]Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394/5079120 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165437?tool=bestpractice.com [145]Kotanidis CP, Mills GB, Bendz B, et al. Invasive vs. conservative management of older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jun 14;45(23):2052-62. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177715 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38596853?tool=bestpractice.com
General recommendations for invasive coronary angiogram and revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes include the following three approaches.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210
[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How do routine and selective invasive strategies compare for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.1452/fullShow me the answer
1) An immediate invasive strategy (<2 hours) in patients with at least one of the following very high-risk criteria: ongoing or recurrent chest pain despite treatment; hemodynamic instability (low blood pressure) or cardiogenic shock; recurrent dynamic ECG changes or ongoing chest pain refractory to medical treatment; acute left ventricular failure, presumed secondary to ongoing myocardial ischemia; life-threatening arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or cardiac arrest after presentation; or mechanical complications such as new onset or worsening mitral regurgitation or acute pulmonary edema.
2) An early invasive strategy (<24 hours) in patients with at least one of the following high-risk criteria: a confirmed diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on current recommended high-sensitive troponin assays algorithms; dynamic ST- or T-wave changes (symptomatic or silent); transient ST-elevation, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score >140 or steeply rising Tn values on serial testing despite optimized medical therapy.
3) Patients with no recurrence of symptoms and none of the high or very high-risk features are considered at low risk for acute ischemic events and can be managed by a selective invasive strategy which may be reasonable to perform prior to hospital discharge.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [146]Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-77. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504439?tool=bestpractice.com Patients who are on optimal medical therapy and are still having symptoms and/or those with large areas of ischemia (>10% of left ventricular myocardium) should be considered for revascularization.[146]Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-77. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504439?tool=bestpractice.com A noninvasive test for ischemia (preferably with imaging) is recommended in patients with none of the above-mentioned risk criteria and no recurrent symptoms, before deciding on an invasive evaluation.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210
Following a selective invasive strategy, a coronary angiogram is usually carried out for recurring symptoms, objective evidence of ischemia on noninvasive testing, or detection of obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography.
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
PCI involves angioplasty, alone or in combination with placement of a stent, capable of relieving coronary narrowing or occlusion.[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com Radial artery access is preferred when possible as it decreases procedural site complications.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Vranckx P, Frigoli E, Rothenbühler M, et al; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 7;38(14):1069-80. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/38/14/1069/3058512 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28329389?tool=bestpractice.com
Complications of PCI include PCI-induced myocardial infarction; coronary perforation, dissection, or rupture; cardiac tamponade; malignant arrhythmias; cholesterol emboli; and bleeding from the access site. At experienced high-volume sites, radial artery access is preferred due to decreased access site complications.[155]Vranckx P, Frigoli E, Rothenbühler M, et al; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 7;38(14):1069-80. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/38/14/1069/3058512 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28329389?tool=bestpractice.com
Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common and potentially serious complication, especially in patients with baseline impaired renal function.[156]McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker C, et al. Epidemiology and prognostic implications of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 18;98(6A):5-13K. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16949375?tool=bestpractice.com Stent thromboses (early and late) are a catastrophic complication.
In patients with multivessel disease who are undergoing immediate invasive treatment and in cardiogenic shock, routine PCI of a nonculprit artery should not be performed due to the increased risk of kidney failure or death.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com
anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation treatment should be added to antiplatelet therapy at the earliest recognition (or suspicion) of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. This can be with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (e.g., enoxaparin, dalteparin), intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), or bivalirudin, and therapy can be continued throughout hospitalization or until the time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).[137]Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 30;50(18):1742-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17964037?tool=bestpractice.com Although UFH has traditionally been the preferred anticoagulant to support PCI, intravenous enoxaparin may be considered as an alternative.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com Fondaparinux alone is no longer recommended due to a higher incidence of guiding-catheter thrombosis.[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com Bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative to unfractionated heparin for patients undergoing PCI.[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com The anticoagulant is used in conjunction with antiplatelet therapy already started.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 Anticoagulation should not be given if there are contraindications: namely, major bleeding, or history of adverse drug reaction or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
The antiplatelet and anticoagulation regimens should be started before the diagnostic angiogram (i.e., upstream).
UFH and LMWH are thrombin inhibitors. Like heparin, their mechanism of action involves binding to antithrombin III to increase its anticoagulant activity.
UFH and LMWH are contraindicated in patients with major bleeding, history of adverse drug reaction, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Creatinine clearance should be assessed before administering enoxaparin. Patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/minute) should be considered for UFH over enoxaparin, or a dose reduction may be required in these patients.
Primary options
heparin: 60 units/kg intravenous bolus initially, followed by 12 units/kg/hour infusion, adjust dose to target aPTT of 50-75 seconds
OR
enoxaparin: 30 mg intravenous bolus initially, followed by 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
OR
dalteparin: 120 units/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, maximum 10,000 units twice daily
OR
bivalirudin: 0.1 mg/kg intravenous bolus, followed by 0.25 mg/kg/hour intravenous infusion until diagnostic angiography or PCI is performed
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Addition of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor is recommended if there is a large thrombus burden, evidence of a no-reflow, or slow flow at percutaneous coronary intervention.[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors block platelet binding of fibrinogen to the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. This is the final stage before platelet aggregation and the formation of thrombus.
Tirofiban or eptifibatide are the preferred options if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration is planned.[153]Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 21;344(25):1879-87. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200106213442501 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11419424?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Brown DL, Fann CS, Chang CJ. Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of abciximab versus eptifibatide or tirofiban in percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;87(5):537-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11230835?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
eptifibatide: 180 micrograms/kg intravenous bolus initially at time of percutaneous coronary intervention, followed by 2 micrograms/kg/min infusion for up to 18-24 hours and a second bolus of 180 micrograms/kg/dose 10 minutes after the initial bolus
OR
tirofiban: 0.4 micrograms/kg/min intravenous infusion for 30 minutes, followed by 0.1 micrograms/kg/min
anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation therapy can be with subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (e.g., enoxaparin, dalteparin), or intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), or fondaparinux, and therapy can be continued throughout hospitalization or until the time of percutaneous coronary intervention, if this is subsequently planned.[137]Mehta SR, Granger CB, Eikelboom JW, et al. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 30;50(18):1742-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17964037?tool=bestpractice.com The anticoagulant is used in conjunction with antiplatelet therapy already started.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210
Anticoagulation should not be given if there are contraindicated: namely, major bleeding or history of adverse drug reaction or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
UFH and LMWH are thrombin inhibitors. Like heparin, their mechanism of action involves binding to antithrombin III to increase its anticoagulant activity. UFH and LMWH are contraindicated in patients with major bleeding, history of adverse drug reaction, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Creatinine clearance should be assessed before administering enoxaparin. Patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/minute) should be considered for UFH over enoxaparin, or a dose reduction may be required in these patients.
If the treatment program changes and percutaneous coronary intervention is performed while the patient is on fondaparinux, an additional anticoagulant with anti-IIa activity (either UFH or bivalirudin) should be administered because of the risk of catheter thrombosis.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
heparin: 60 units/kg intravenous bolus initially, followed by 12-15 units/kg/hour infusion, adjust dose to target aPTT of 50-75 seconds
OR
enoxaparin: 30 mg intravenous bolus initially, followed by 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
OR
dalteparin: 120 units/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, maximum 10,000 units twice daily
OR
fondaparinux: 2.5 mg subcutaneously once daily for up to 8 days
post-stabilization
cardiac rehabilitation
The aims of cardiac rehabilitation are to increase functional capacity; stop cigarette smoking; modify lipids and lipoproteins; decrease body weight and fat stores; reduce blood pressure; improve psychosocial wellbeing; prevent progression and promote plaque stability; induce regression of underlying atherosclerosis; and restore and maintain optimal physical, psychological, emotional, social, and vocational functioning.[158]Brown TM, Pack QR, Aberegg E, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation programs: 2024 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):e328-47. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001289 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39315436?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Leon AS, Franklin BA, Costa F, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2005 Jan 25;111(3):369-76. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.0000151788.08740.5c http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15668354?tool=bestpractice.com
Cardiac rehabilitation should be started on discharge and after clearance by an outpatient physician.[158]Brown TM, Pack QR, Aberegg E, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation programs: 2024 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):e328-47. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001289 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39315436?tool=bestpractice.com The basic prescription should include aerobic and weight-bearing exercise 4 to 5 times per week for >30 minutes. There is a risk of triggering a recurrent myocardial infarction with physical activity. However, this is minimal and reduced by using a structured program to minimize (and treat) this risk.[160]Leon AS, Franklin BA, Costa F, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2005 Jan 25;111(3):369-76. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.0000151788.08740.5c http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15668354?tool=bestpractice.com
continue antiplatelet therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Aspirin should be continued indefinitely at a low dose if the patient is tolerant and not contraindicated. A P2Y12 inhibitor should be continued for up to 12 months. For patients with aspirin allergy, long-term P2Y12 inhibitor use is suggested.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [161]Becker RC, Meade TW, Berger PB, et al; American College of Chest Physicians. The primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):776-814S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18574278?tool=bestpractice.com [162]Harrington RA, Becker RC, Cannon CP, et al; American College of Chest Physicians. Antithrombotic therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008 Jun;133(suppl 6):670-707S. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18574276?tool=bestpractice.com
In selected patients who have had percutaneous coronary intervention, shorter-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (1-3 months) can be considered, with subsequent transition to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy to reduce the risk of bleeding events.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com
Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy strategies and de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy can be considered in patients at high risk of bleeding.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210
Primary options
aspirin-tolerant
aspirin: 81 mg orally once daily
-- AND --
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
or
ticagrelor: 90 mg orally twice daily
or
prasugrel: 10 mg orally once daily
OR
aspirin-intolerant
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
or
ticagrelor: 90 mg orally twice daily
or
prasugrel: 10 mg orally once daily
continue beta-blocker
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Indefinite use of oral beta-blockers has been shown to benefit patients with acute infarction and/or reduced left ventricular function.
Cardioselective beta-blockers are preferred in the initial management of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), but guidelines recommend metoprolol, bisoprolol, or carvedilol for post-NSTEMI management in patients with stabilized heart failure and reduced systolic function.[88]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com The decision to continue beta-blockers long term after revascularization should be made on an individualized basis.[97]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee On Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
metoprolol succinate: 25-200 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 1.25 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 12.5 mg orally twice daily for 2 days, followed by 25 mg twice daily
statin
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
All patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction should receive a high-intensity statin (moderate intensity if not candidate for high-intensity) in hospital regardless of cholesterol levels, and if there are no contraindications.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [163]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com [164]Schubert J, Lindahl B, Melhus H, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and statin intensity in myocardial infarction patients and major adverse outcomes: a Swedish nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2021 Jan 20;42(3):243-52. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/3/243/6047259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33367526?tool=bestpractice.com A high-intensity statin is defined as a daily dose that lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by approximately >50%, while a moderate-intensity statin daily dose lowers LDL-C by approximately 30% to 50%.
Statins inhibit the rate-limiting step in cholesterol synthesis. They may also reduce vascular inflammation, improve endothelial function, and decrease thrombus formation in addition to lowering LDL.[167]Sposito AC, Chapman MJ. Statin therapy in acute coronary syndromes: mechanistic insight into clinical benefit. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002 Oct 1;22(10):1524-34. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.atv.0000032033.39301.6a http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12377727?tool=bestpractice.com
For secondary prevention, treatment of patients who have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) depends on their risk of future ASCVD events.[163]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com Patients are considered to be at very high risk of future events if they have a history of multiple major ASCVD events (recent acute coronary syndrome [within the past 12 months], myocardial infarction other than the recent acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, symptomatic peripheral arterial disease [claudication with ankle brachial index <0.85, previous revascularization or amputation]) or one major ASCVD event and multiple high-risk conditions (age ≥65 years, heterozygous family history, history of previous coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, current smoking, persistently elevated LDL-C [≥100 mg/dL] despite maximally tolerated therapy, history of congestive heart failure). Patients at very high risk of future events should receive high-intensity statin therapy or maximal statin therapy. In patients not at very high risk of future events, high-intensity statin therapy should be initiated and continued in those ages up to 75 years with the aim of achieving a 50% or greater reduction in LDL-C levels. Moderate-intensity statin therapy may be used (reducing LDL-C by 30% to <50%) if high-intensity statin therapy is not tolerated. In patients older than 75 years, moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy should be considered.[163]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com All patients should have a fasting lipid panel 4-8 weeks after statin initiation or dose adjustment of lipid-lowering therapy to assess both patient lipid level response and/or adherence to therapy.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients should be monitored for jaundice, malaise, fatigue, and lethargy.[168]McKenney JM, Davidson MH, Jacobson TA, et al. Final conclusions and recommendations of the National Lipid Association Statin Safety Assessment Task Force. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 17;97(8A):89-94C. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16581336?tool=bestpractice.com
Fractionated bilirubin should be used rather than alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) to detect liver dysfunction. If evidence of liver injury is found, the statin should be stopped. If ALT or AST exceeds 3 times the upper limit of normal, the levels can be repeated but there is no need to stop the statin.[168]McKenney JM, Davidson MH, Jacobson TA, et al. Final conclusions and recommendations of the National Lipid Association Statin Safety Assessment Task Force. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 17;97(8A):89-94C. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16581336?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
high-intensity statin
atorvastatin: 40-80 mg orally once daily
OR
high-intensity statin
rosuvastatin: 20-40 mg orally once daily
Secondary options
moderate-intensity statin
atorvastatin: 10-20 mg orally once daily
OR
moderate-intensity statin
rosuvastatin: 5-10 mg orally once daily
OR
moderate-intensity statin
lovastatin: 40 mg orally once daily
OR
moderate-intensity statin
fluvastatin: 40 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily; 80 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
moderate-intensity statin
simvastatin: 20-40 mg orally once daily
More simvastatinDoses higher than 40 mg/day are not recommended due to the increased risk of myopathy.
OR
moderate-intensity statin
pravastatin: 40-80 mg orally once daily
OR
moderate-intensity statin
pitavastatin: 2-4 mg orally once daily
ezetimibe
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
For patients at very high risk of future events, and those ages up to 75 years and not at very high risk, ezetimibe may be added if the patient is on maximal statin therapy and LDL-cholesterol levels suggest targets will not be met with statin therapy alone.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [52]Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2387-97. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1410489 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26039521?tool=bestpractice.com [163]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com [169]Tsujita K, Sugiyama S, Sumida H, et al. Impact of dual lipid-lowering strategy with ezetimibe and atorvastatin on coronary plaque regression in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: the multicentre randomized controlled PRECISE-IVUS Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 4;66(5):495-507. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26227186?tool=bestpractice.com
It is reasonable in this high-risk population to further intensify lipid-lowering therapy with a non-statin agent, such as ezetimibe, if the LDL-C level is 55 to <70 mg/dL (1.4 to <1.8 mmol/L) and the patient is already on a maximally tolerated statin. The LDL-C lowering potential of ezetimibe is greatest when used in combination with a statin.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
ezetimibe: 10 mg orally once daily
proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
The addition of a PCSK9 inhibitor monoclonal antibody such as alirocumab and evolocumab to maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy may also be considered for patients at very high risk of future events if LDL-cholesterol level remains ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL.[5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [163]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2097-107. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1801174?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30403574?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Oyama K, Giugliano RP, Tang M, et al. Effect of evolocumab on acute arterial events across all vascular territories : results from the FOURIER trial. Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 14;42(47):4821-9. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/47/4821/6372436 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537830?tool=bestpractice.com [173]Nicholls SJ, Kataoka Y, Nissen SE, et al. Effect of evolocumab on coronary plaque phenotype and burden in statin-treated patients following myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1308-21. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X22001437 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431172?tool=bestpractice.com
Alirocumab is approved for use as adjunct therapy to diet and maximally tolerated statin therapy for adult patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, who require additional lowering of LDL and also to reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization in adults with established cardiovascular disease.
Evolocumab is approved as an adjunct to diet and other lipid-lowering therapies (e.g., statins, ezetimibe) in patients with primary hyperlipidemia (including heterozygous hypercholesterolemia) and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia to reduce LDL. It is now also approved to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with established cardiovascular disease, and may be used for this indication without adjunctive diet and lipid-lowering therapies.
Evolocumab and alirocumab may also be used as an alternative to statins if they are contraindicated or the patient is intolerant of statins.
Primary options
alirocumab: 75-150 mg subcutaneously once every two weeks, or 300 mg subcutaneously once monthly
OR
evolocumab: 140 mg subcutaneously once every two weeks, or 420 mg subcutaneously once monthly
ACE inhibitor or angiotensin-II receptor antagonist
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
ACE inhibitors should be used in all patients with left ventricle systolic dysfunction with reduced ejection fraction (<40%), hypertension, diabetes, and/or stable chronic kidney disease.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com [5]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 [176]Wu J, Hall AS, Gale CP, et al. Long-term survival benefit of ramipril in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure. Heart. 2021 Mar;107(5):389-95. https://heart.bmj.com/content/107/5/389.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33452123?tool=bestpractice.com [189]Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA, et al. Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005 Jun 15;293(23):2908-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15956636?tool=bestpractice.com
Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists may be used in cases of intolerance to ACE inhibitors.[178]Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 13;349(20):1893-906. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa032292 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14610160?tool=bestpractice.com [179]Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):772-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13678870?tool=bestpractice.com [180]Dickstein K, Kjekshus J; OPTIMAAL Steering Committee of the OPTIMAAL Study Group. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan. Lancet. 2002;360:752-760. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12241832?tool=bestpractice.com
ACE inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor antagonists may be started 24 hours post myocardial infarction.
Goal BP is at least <140/90 mmHg (including patients with chronic kidney disease or diabetes).[177]James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1791497 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24352797?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
enalapril: 2.5 mg orally once daily for 48 hours, increase gradually to 10 mg twice daily
OR
lisinopril: 5 mg orally once daily for 48 hours, followed by 5-10 mg once daily
OR
captopril: 6.25 mg orally three times daily starting on day 3 post-MI, increase gradually to 50 mg three times daily
Secondary options
valsartan: 20 mg orally twice daily initially, increase gradually to 160 mg twice daily
OR
losartan: 50 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually to 100 mg once daily
OR
candesartan cilexetil: 4 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually to 32 mg once daily
sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
An SGLT2 inhibitor (e.g., dapagliflozin, empagliflozin) should be given to patients with heart failure when they are clinically stable, regardless of their left ventricular ejection fraction.[190]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045 [191]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2023 Focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3627-39. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/37/3627/7246292 [192]von Lewinski D, Kolesnik E, Tripolt NJ, et al. Empagliflozin in acute myocardial infarction: the EMMY trial. Eur Heart J. 2022 Nov 1;43(41):4421-32. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/41/4421/6677315 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36036746?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
dapagliflozin: 10 mg orally once daily
OR
empagliflozin: 10 mg orally once daily
aldosterone antagonist
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Aldosterone antagonists (e.g., eplerenone, spironolactone) should be used in all patients with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40%), a history of diabetes mellitus, or evidence of congestive heart failure (S3 gallop, rales). They should be started in patients receiving target doses of an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin-II receptor antagonist. Aldosterone blockade should not be used in patients with serum creatinine >2.5mg/dL in men or >2.0mg/dL in women, as well as in patients with hyperkalemia (potassium >5.0mEq/L).[181]Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1309-21. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa030207 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12668699?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
eplerenone: 25 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually to 50 mg once daily within 4 weeks
OR
spironolactone: 12.5 to 25 mg orally once daily
anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Oral anticoagulation may be indicated at discharge in selected patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction who are considered to be at high-risk for recurrent thrombosis (e.g., patients with atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, prosthetic heart valve). While direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors may produce a modest reduction in ischemic events when added to antiplatelet therapy, results also suggest that they increase the risk of major bleeding, particularly when added to dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel.[182]Oldgren J, Wallentin L, Alexander JH, et al. New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2013 Jun;34(22):1670-80. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/34/22/1670/502295 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23470494?tool=bestpractice.com Low-dose rivaroxaban has been demonstrated to reduce future cardiovascular events but causes an almost equivalent increase in major bleeding events.[183]Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al; ATLAS ACS 2–TIMI 51 Investigators. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 5;366(1):9-19. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1112277 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22077192?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two rivaroxaban doses in acute coronary syndrome (from ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51). Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 15;112(4):472-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23711804?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients requiring continued oral anticoagulation, aspirin should be discontinued after 1-4 weeks of triple antithrombotic therapy, with continued use of a P2Y12 inhibitor (preferably clopidogrel) and an oral anticoagulant to reduce bleeding risk.[2]Rao SV, O'Donoghue ML, Ruel M, et al. 2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2025 Apr;151(13):e771-862. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001309?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40014670?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
warfarin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
rivaroxaban: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
apixaban: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer