General considerations
Current strategies for novel therapies include neuroprotection, small-molecule drugs, stem-cell based therapy, and retinal prosthesis. As with all emerging therapies, care must be taken to account for biased investigator observations and placebo effect in the design of clinical trials, as well as the critical analysis of data and responsible promotion of any potential treatment.[67]Fishman GA. A historical perspective on the early treatment of night blindness and the use of dubious and unproven treatment strategies for patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Surv Ophthalmol. 22013 Nov-Dec;58(6):652-63.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23911150?tool=bestpractice.com
Neuroprotection
The goal of neuroprotection is to deliver factors that prevent retinal neurons from degenerating. One potentially successful compound in animal studies has been ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF). A study in patients with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration showed that a subgroup of patients with CNTF implants retained better visual acuity than those who received sham treatment.[68]Zhang K, Hopkins JJ, Heier JS, et al. Ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered by encapsulated cell intraocular implants for treatment of geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 12;108(15):6241-5.
https://www.pnas.org/content/108/15/6241.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21444807?tool=bestpractice.com
One large multicenter sham-surgery-controlled dose-ranging clinical trial investigated the long-term delivery of CNTF to the retina, using an encapsulated cell technology, for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa (RP).[69]Bush RA, Lei B, Tao W, et al. Encapsulated cell-based intraocular delivery of ciliary neurotrophic factor in normal rabbit: dose-dependent effects on ERG and retinal histology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jul;45(7):2420-30.
https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2124716
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15223826?tool=bestpractice.com
[70]Birch DG, Weleber RG, Duncan JL, et al. Randomized trial of ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered by encapsulated cell intraocular implants for retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;156(2):283-92.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111936
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23668681?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients were randomly assigned to receive a high- or low-dose implant in one eye and sham surgery in the other eye. The results demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in retinal thickness without any serious adverse events related to either the encapsulated cell implant or the surgical procedure; however, there was no therapeutic effect on visual acuity or visual-field sensitivity after 12 months in late-stage and early-stage disease, respectively. A trial using the calcium-channel blocker nilvadipine demonstrated preservation of central visual fields in a small group of patients with RP.[71]Nakazawa M, Ohguro H, Takeuchi K, et al. Effect of nilvadipine on central visual field in retinitis pigmentosa: a 30-month clinical trial. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225(2):120-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20948238?tool=bestpractice.com
Similarly, topical unoprostone isopropyl was shown to preserve macular sensitivity after one year of treatment in a small group of patients with RP.[72]Akiyama M, Ikeda Y, Yoshida N, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of topical unoprostone isopropyl in retinitis pigmentosa. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 May;92(3):e229-34.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24868583?tool=bestpractice.com
Larger, multicenter double-blinded clinical trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of these neuroprotective agents. Further clinical trials of neuroprotection are currently underway exploring other neuroprotective approaches for RP, including the use of methotrexate to promote the clearance of misfolded rhodopsin proteins, and the use of oral acetylcysteine to reduce oxidative stress in the retina.[73]Liu X, Feng B, Vats A, et al. Pharmacological clearance of misfolded rhodopsin for the treatment of RHO-associated retinitis pigmentosa. FASEB J. 2020 Aug;34(8):10146-67.
https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fj.202000282R
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536017?tool=bestpractice.com
[74]ClinicalTrials.gov. A study in subjects with retinitis pigmentosa. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05392179. Apr 2024 [intenet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05392179
[75]Johns Hopkins Medicine; Wilmer Eye Institute. NAC attack: a multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trial to test oral N-acetylcysteine in patients. [internet publication].
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/wilmer/research/nac-attack
[76]Raghu G, Berk M, Campochiaro PA, et al. The multifaceted therapeutic role of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in disorders characterized by oxidative stress. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(8):1202-24.
https://www.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X19666201230144109
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380301?tool=bestpractice.com
Cell- and stem cell-based therapy
Transplantation of various precursor cells into the subretinal space have been attempted to regenerate retinal pigment epithelial cells.[77]da Cruz L, Chen FK, Ahmado A, et al. RPE transplantation and its role in retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007 Nov;26(6):598-635.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17920328?tool=bestpractice.com
One study demonstrated the safety of injecting autologous bone-marrow-derived mononuclear cells in 5 patients with retinal degeneration; further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cell-based therapies.[78]Siqueira RC, Messias A, Voltarelli JC, et al. Intravitreal injection of autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells for hereditary retinal dystrophy: a phase I trial. Retina. 2011 Jun;31(6):1207-14.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21293313?tool=bestpractice.com
With the advent of induced pluripotent stem cells that can be generated from the adult cells of patients with RP, not only can future cell-based replacement strategies be tailored to each individual but also new in-vitro techniques can be developed to better understand specific disease mechanisms and test the efficacy of therapies prior to clinical trials.[79]Tucker BA, Mullins RF, Stone EM. Stem cells for investigation and treatment of inherited retinal disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Sep 15;23(R1):R9-R16.
http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/R1/R9.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24647603?tool=bestpractice.com
Electronic retinal implants
Several groups have developed silicon microelectrodes for patients with profound vision loss from diseases such as RP. Such devices convert visual stimuli into electronic signals, which can stimulate photoreceptor cells in the retina.[80]Chow AY, Chow VY, Packo KH, et al. The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):460-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078662?tool=bestpractice.com
[81]Loewenstein JI, Montezuma SR, Rizzo JF 3rd. Outer retinal degeneration: an electronic retinal prosthesis as a treatment strategy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):587-96.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15078678?tool=bestpractice.com
[82]Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2573-81.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13129543?tool=bestpractice.com
These implants are best suited to the treatment of advanced disease where patients have residual visual acuity of light perception in their better eye. Although there is severe attenuation of the outer retina and disorganization of the inner retina in late-stage RP, the residual retinal nerve fiber layer is relatively preserved and susceptible to electrical stimulation, which can produce artificial vision in the form of perceived phosphenes. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Argus II device for use within the US in February 2013. One single-center study evaluating 12-month safety and efficacy outcomes in 6 patients with RP showed the Argus II device to be well-tolerated.[83]Rizzo S, Belting C, Cinelli L, et al. The Argus II retinal prosthesis: 12-month outcomes from a single-study center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;157(6):1282-90.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24560994?tool=bestpractice.com
With rigorous rehabilitation, the patients generally experienced limited improvement in visual function. However, this device was discontinued in 2019 and is no longer available. Other types of retinal prostheses are under development and testing in clinical trials, such as the second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.[84]Petoe MA, Abbott CJ, Titchener SA, et al. A second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: a single-arm clinical trial of feasibility. Ophthalmol Sci. 2025 Jan-Feb;5(1):100525.
https://www.ophthalmologyscience.org/article/S2666-9145(24)00061-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39328823?tool=bestpractice.com
[85]Allen PJ, Kolic M, Baglin EK, et al. Second-generation (44-channel) suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: surgical stability and safety during a 2-year clinical trial. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul;53(5):529-41.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ceo.14502
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40624842?tool=bestpractice.com