Aortic dissection
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
Look out for this icon: for treatment options that are affected, or added, as a result of your patient's comorbidities.
hemodynamically unstable: suspected aortic dissection
advanced life support with hemodynamic support
The advanced cardiovascular life support resuscitation protocol should be followed.
Supplemental oxygen and hemodynamic support are recommended, with specific treatment for incipient renal failure and shock, as needed. See Acute kidney injury and Shock.
confirmed aortic dissection
1st line – beta-blocker or nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker
beta-blocker or nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker
Initial management of both type A and B dissections involves anti-impulse medical therapy, regardless of definitive treatment.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous beta-blockers are used to achieve a systolic blood pressure less than 120 mmHg or to lowest blood pressure that maintains adequate end-organ perfusion and an appropriate target heart rate.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com
Recommendations for target heart rate vary; the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend a target heart rate of 60 to 80 bpm; the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery recommend maintaining a heart rate of <70 bpm; the European Society of Cardiology recommends a heart rate of <60 bpm as the target for medical therapy.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [6]MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1073-92. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.002 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090687?tool=bestpractice.com [10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with contraindications (e.g., acute aortic regurgitation, heart block, or bradycardia), or intolerance to beta-blockers, initial management with an intravenous nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (e.g., diltiazem) is reasonable for heart rate control.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com Invasive monitoring of blood pressure with an arterial line in an intensive care unit setting is recommended to monitor the anti-impulse therapy to ultimately decrease aortic wall stress.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
labetalol: 20 mg intravenously initially, followed by 20-80 mg every 10 minutes (or 0.5 to 10 mg/minute infusion) until target heart rate and blood pressure are reached, maximum 300 mg/total dose
OR
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously initially, followed by 25-50 micrograms/kg/minute infusion, titrate infusion by 25-50 micrograms/kg/minute every 5 minutes until target heart rate and blood pressure are reached (may consider repeat loading dose before every up titration), maximum 300 micrograms/kg/minute
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously every 5-10 minutes when required, maximum 15 mg/total dose
Secondary options
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenously initially (may give another dose of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes), followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion for <24 hours
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
labetalol: 20 mg intravenously initially, followed by 20-80 mg every 10 minutes (or 0.5 to 10 mg/minute infusion) until target heart rate and blood pressure are reached, maximum 300 mg/total dose
OR
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously initially, followed by 25-50 micrograms/kg/minute infusion, titrate infusion by 25-50 micrograms/kg/minute every 5 minutes until target heart rate and blood pressure are reached (may consider repeat loading dose before every up titration), maximum 300 micrograms/kg/minute
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously every 5-10 minutes when required, maximum 15 mg/total dose
Secondary options
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenously initially (may give another dose of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes), followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion for <24 hours
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
labetalol
OR
esmolol
OR
metoprolol tartrate
Secondary options
diltiazem
opioid analgesia
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Pain control is an important first-line therapy to reduce sympathetic tone and facilitate hemodynamic stability.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com It should be noted that morphine causes vasodilation and reduces the heart rate by increasing vagal tone.
Primary options
morphine sulfate: 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously every 2-6 hours when required, adjust dose according to response
OR
hydromorphone: 0.2 to 1 mg intravenously every 2-3 hours when required, adjust dose according to response
OR
fentanyl: 50-100 micrograms intravenously every 1-2 hours when required
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
morphine sulfate: 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously every 2-6 hours when required, adjust dose according to response
OR
hydromorphone: 0.2 to 1 mg intravenously every 2-3 hours when required, adjust dose according to response
OR
fentanyl: 50-100 micrograms intravenously every 1-2 hours when required
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
morphine sulfate
OR
hydromorphone
OR
fentanyl
vasodilator
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
If first-line treatment with beta-blockers (or nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers in patients with contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers) and analgesia fail to achieve a systolic blood pressure less than 120 mmHg and an appropriate target heart rate, then intravenous antihypertensive vasodilator therapy (such as nitroprusside) should be added.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com
Vasodilators should be used with caution and avoided as initial treatment, ensuring chronotropic control with beta-blockers is established first, to avoid reflex tachycardia.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
nitroprusside: 0.3 to 0.5 micrograms/kg/minute intravenously initially, increase by 0.5 micrograms/kg/minute increments every 5 minutes, maximum 10 micrograms/kg/minute for 10 minutes
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
nitroprusside: 0.3 to 0.5 micrograms/kg/minute intravenously initially, increase by 0.5 micrograms/kg/minute increments every 5 minutes, maximum 10 micrograms/kg/minute for 10 minutes
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
nitroprusside
open surgery or endovascular stent-graft repair
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Type A dissection involves the ascending aorta with or without involvement of the arch and descending aorta. In patients presenting with suspected or confirmed acute type A aortic dissection, there is a high risk of associated life-threatening complications.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com Emergency surgical evaluation and intervention is recommended. The mortality rate of medical management alone for acute type A aortic dissection is two to three times that of surgical intervention.[37]Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):897-903. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/192401 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10685714?tool=bestpractice.com In a patient stable enough for transfer, moving to a high-volume aortic center is recommended in order to improve survival.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com
Depending on the extent of retrograde extension, the aortic valve may or may not need to be repaired or replaced.[10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com This is to prevent cardiac tamponade or fatal exsanguination from aortic rupture.
Therapeutic options include: open aortic arch replacement; transposition of supra-aortic branches with subsequent endovascular repair; total endovascular repair; or the frozen elephant trunk repair technique, which combines open repair of the proximal aorta under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, together with placement of thoracic stent grafts into the distal aortic arch and upper descending thoracic aorta.[38]Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Editor's Choice - current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) & the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;57(2):165-98. https://www.ejves.com/article/S1078-5884(18)30692-0/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30318395?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with renal, mesenteric, or lower extremity malperfusion, immediate operative repair of the ascending aorta is recommended.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com In patients presenting with clinically significant mesenteric (e.g., celiac, superior mesenteric) malperfusion, immediate mesenteric revascularization via endovascular or open surgical intervention before ascending aortic repair is also reasonable.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com Evidence of mesenteric malperfusion includes abdominal pain, bowel ischemia, lactic acidosis, or elevation of liver function test results.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com
One meta-analysis of comparator observational studies reported lower stroke and mortality rates, but higher spinal cord ischemia events, with the frozen elephant trunk technique compared with conventional aortic arch surgery.[42]Hanif H, Dubois L, Ouzounian M, et al. Aortic arch reconstructive surgery with conventional techniques vs frozen elephant trunk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2018 Mar;34(3):262-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29395709?tool=bestpractice.com Longer term follow-up is necessary.[43]Cao P, De Rango P, Czerny M, et al. Systematic review of clinical outcomes in hybrid procedures for aortic arch dissections and other arch diseases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Dec;144(6):1286-300, 1300.e1-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22789301?tool=bestpractice.com
endovascular stent-graft repair or open surgery
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Type B dissection involves only the descending thoracic aorta (distal to the left subclavian artery) and/or abdominal aorta.
Urgent surgical or endovascular intervention is required if type B dissection is complicated by rupture, visceral or extremity ischemia, aneurysmal expansion, or persistent pain.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend endovascular stent grafting rather than open surgical repair in patients with acute type B aortic dissection with rupture, in the presence of suitable anatomy.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com The ACC/AHA note that an endovascular approach, rather than open surgical repair, is also reasonable in patients with other complications (e.g., branch artery occlusion and malperfusion, extension of dissection, aortic enlargement, intractable pain, or uncontrolled hypertension).[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery state that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is indicated in patients with complicated hyperacute, acute, or subacute type B dissection and favorable anatomy for TEVAR.[6]MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1073-92. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.002 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090687?tool=bestpractice.com However, open surgical repair is reasonable over TEVAR as a more durable treatment in patients with connective tissue disorders who have type B dissection with progression of disease despite optimal medical therapy.[6]MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1073-92. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.002 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090687?tool=bestpractice.com
The European Society of Cardiology recommends endovascular therapy for complicated acute type B dissection as the first-line treatment, if there is favorable anatomy, and reserves open surgical repair for patients unsuitable for endovascular therapy.[10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com
For complicated type B dissections, the goal of open surgery is to resect/cover the entry tear and re-establish flow into compromised branch vessels.
consider endovascular stent-graft repair
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (i.e., without end-organ malperfusion) are usually managed medically with blood pressure and pain control during the acute phase (less than 14 days).[10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com [23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com [38]Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, et al. Editor's Choice - current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) & the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;57(2):165-98. https://www.ejves.com/article/S1078-5884(18)30692-0/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30318395?tool=bestpractice.com The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery state that optimal medical therapy remains the recommended treatment for patients with uncomplicated type B dissection.[6]MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Apr;113(4):1073-92. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.002 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090687?tool=bestpractice.com
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly performed in patients with uncomplicated dissections and high-risk features in the subacute phase (14-90 days) to promote false lumen thrombosis and prevent aneurysmal degeneration.[10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com However, there is considerable heterogeneity of published data; results from meta-analyses evaluating TEVAR in patients with type B aortic dissection should be interpreted with caution.
One meta-analysis found no evidence for survival benefit at 1 year for patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) treated with TEVAR compared with those receiving best medical therapy.[49]Enezate TH, Omran J, Al-Dadah AS, et al. Thoracic endovascular repair versus medical management for acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 1;91(6):1138-43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29152822?tool=bestpractice.com Another meta-analysis found that TEVAR did not prevent aneurysmal degeneration in patients treated for acute or chronic (including complicated) TBAD, noting that long-term data are lacking.[50]Famularo M, Meyermann K, Lombardi JV. Aneurysmal degeneration of type B aortic dissections after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):924-30. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.067 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28736120?tool=bestpractice.com Results from one meta-analysis of a mixed patient population (complicated/uncomplicated, acute/subacute TBAD) and one randomized study of patients with stable TBAD, respectively, suggest that aneurysm-specific outcomes may be favorable over the longer term following TEVAR.[51]Nienaber CA, Kische S, Rousseau H, et al; INSTEAD-XL Trial. Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: long-term results of the randomized investigation of stent grafts in aortic dissection trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(4):407-16. http://circinterventions.ahajournals.org/content/6/4/407.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23922146?tool=bestpractice.com [52]Li FR, Wu X, Yuan J, et al. Comparison of thoracic endovascular aortic repair, open surgery and best medical treatment for type B aortic dissection: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;250:240-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29066151?tool=bestpractice.com Larger trials with longer-term data are still required.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com
There may be some benefit to early endovascular intervention in patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection with refractory pain and hypertension.[53]Trimarchi S, Eagle KA, Nienaber CA, et al. Importance of refractory pain and hypertension in acute type B aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). Circulation. 2010 Sep 28;122(13):1283-9. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/122/13/1283.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20837896?tool=bestpractice.com TEVAR in the subacute phase of type B dissection may be associated with a lower risk of complications, particularly retrograde type A dissection.[54]Desai ND, Gottret JP, Szeto WY, et al. Impact of timing on major complications after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute type B aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2 Suppl):S151-6. https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(14)01627-4/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25466855?tool=bestpractice.com
chronic (all types)
antihypertensive therapy
Aortic dissection is a lifelong condition. It is defined as chronic at >90 days since the first onset of symptoms.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
The patient's blood pressure and heart rate should continue to be managed very carefully after hospital discharge.
Beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors are usually required, with additional antihypertensives such as diuretics or calcium-channel blockers used if necessary.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com [10]Mazzolai L, Teixido-Tura G, Lanzi S, et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases. Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3538-700. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae179 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210722?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com
Consider – open surgery or endovascular stent-graft repair
open surgery or endovascular stent-graft repair
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Patients with chronic aortic dissection will require long-term follow-up with surveillance imaging (the time intervals for this will vary between individuals) and may need open surgical repair or endovascular therapy (thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR]) in their lifetime.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com Some patients will not have open surgical repair or TEVAR previously while others might have one of the procedures for the second time.
Indications for surgery in uncomplicated chronic aortic dissections depend on aortic diameter, pathogenesis, and the presence of symptoms. Asymptomatic chronic thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic dissections with a maximal orthogonal aortic diameter of 6.0 cm in patients without connective tissue disease warrant repair.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com [56]Coady MA, Rizzo JA, Hammond GL, et al. What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Mar;113(3):476-91; discussion 489-91. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70360-X http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9081092?tool=bestpractice.com Rapid growth rate >0.5 cm per year also may be an indication for repair.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com Patients with connective tissue diseases and those with a family history warrant more careful consideration and may warrant earlier intervention (diameter of 5.0 to 5.5 cm).[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com [57]Coselli JS, LeMaire SA. Current status of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Marfan syndrome. J Card Surg. 1997 Mar-Apr;12(2 suppl):167-72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9271742?tool=bestpractice.com [58]LeMaire SA, Carter SA, Volguina IV, et al. Spectrum of aortic operations in 300 patients with confirmed or suspected Marfan syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;81(6):2063-78; discussion 2078. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.070 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16731131?tool=bestpractice.com
TEVAR has been increasingly used for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair occurring after aortic dissection because of the low acute risk compared with open repair and the potential to reduce aortic mortality and reoperations compared with medical therapy.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com However, TEVAR faces anatomic and morphologic limitations to successfully treating this disease, particularly in the chronic stage.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075. https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com [59]Scali ST, Feezor RJ, Chang CK, et al. Efficacy of thoracic endovascular stent repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):10-7.e1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170732 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23561433?tool=bestpractice.com [60]Parsa CJ, Williams JB, Bhattacharya SD, et al. Midterm results with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with associated aneurysm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):322-7. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.043 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21241855?tool=bestpractice.com [61]Andacheh ID, Donayre C, Othman F, et al. Patient outcomes and thoracic aortic volume and morphologic changes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with complicated chronic type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Sep;56(3):644-50; discussion 650. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.050 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22640467?tool=bestpractice.com [62]Mani K, Clough RE, Lyons OT, et al. Predictors of outcome after endovascular repair for chronic type B dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;43(4):386-91. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.01.016 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22326695?tool=bestpractice.com TEVAR may be a viable rescue option for patients with type A dissection who are not eligible for open surgical repair.[63]Shah A, Khoynezhad A. Thoracic endovascular repair for acute type A aortic dissection: operative technique. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;5(4):389-96. https://www.doi.org/10.21037/acs.2016.07.08 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563553?tool=bestpractice.com
The goals of TEVAR therapy are to: cover the entry tear; treat or prevent impending rupture; re-establish organ perfusion; restore flow in the true lumen; and induce the false lumen thrombosis.
One Cochrane review noted a lack of clinical trials investigating the effectiveness and safety of TEVAR compared with open surgical repair for patients with complicated chronic type B aortic dissection. The investigators were therefore unable to provide any evidence to inform decision-making on the optimal intervention for these patients.[64]Jordan F, FitzGibbon B, Kavanagh EP, et al. Endovascular versus open surgical repair for complicated chronic Type B aortic dissection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 14;(12):CD012992. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012992.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905228?tool=bestpractice.com In a retrospective analysis of 80 patients who underwent TEVAR for chronic type B aortic dissections, complete false lumen thrombosis was achieved in 52% and aneurysm diameter was stabilized or reduced in 65%; 5-year overall survival was 70%.[59]Scali ST, Feezor RJ, Chang CK, et al. Efficacy of thoracic endovascular stent repair for chronic type B aortic dissection with aneurysmal degeneration. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):10-7.e1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170732 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23561433?tool=bestpractice.com
In a prospective multicenter trial from China, TEVAR for chronic type B aortic dissection decreased the risk of aortic-related mortality compared with optimal medical therapy alone at 4 years, but failed to improve overall survival. The thoracic aorta diameter decreased significantly in the TEVAR group, but increased in the medical therapy group.[65]Zhang MH, Du X, Guo W, et al. Early and midterm outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute and chronic complicated type B aortic dissection. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(28):e7183. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700467?tool=bestpractice.com
There currently are no longer-term data on the efficacy of TEVAR for chronic type B aortic dissection.
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer