Imaging of the aorta should be performed before discharge.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
The time intervals suggested for surveillance imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in patients with chronic aortic dissection vary across guidelines and should be tailored for individual patients.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
The American Heart Association notes that several reasonable follow-up regimens have been proposed for different treatment groups.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
After surgical repair, patients should be followed up after 6 and 12 months, and annually thereafter.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
If a moderate-sized aneurysm remains relatively stable over time, subsequent longer follow-up intervals of 1.5 to 3 years are reasonable. In medically managed uncomplicated type B dissection, one additional earlier scan, for example, at 3 months, may reveal important changes occurring in the subacute phase, when the dissected aorta remains amenable to early thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Earlier follow-up imaging at 30 days is sometimes recommended to identify potential early complications, followed by routine 6-month and 12-month follow-up.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
[77]Zierler RE, Jordan WD, Lal BK, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on follow-up after vascular surgery arterial procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):256-84.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.018
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29937033?tool=bestpractice.com
Continued annual imaging is suggested thereafter. If growth or other complications are detected, shorter follow-up intervals may be required in all treatment groups.[4]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 13;80(24):e223-393.
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.004
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36334952?tool=bestpractice.com
[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
CTA is recommended as the imaging of choice for follow-up of patients who have undergone TEVAR.[23]Fleischmann D, Afifi RO, Casanegra AI, et al. Imaging and surveillance of chronic aortic dissection: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/HCI.0000000000000075
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172599?tool=bestpractice.com
However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred in younger patients to reduce radiation exposure.[13]Bossone E, LaBounty TM, Eagle KA. Acute aortic syndromes: diagnosis and management, an update. Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 1;39(9):739-49d.
https://www.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx319
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29106452?tool=bestpractice.com