New-onset atrial fibrillation
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
hemodynamically unstable
DC cardioversion
Used immediately if the patient is hemodynamically unstable with chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness or syncope, hypotension, and rapid heart rate.
Direct current (DC) cardioversion is performed under adequate short-acting general anesthesia and involves delivery of an electrical shock synchronized with the intrinsic activity of the heart by sensing the R wave of the ECG (i.e., synchronized). The energy output for successful termination of new-onset AF varies from 200 J to a maximum of 400 J depending on the body size and the presence of other comorbid conditions. Lower energy of 100 J may be used as the starting level when biphasic energy is used.
For patients with hemodynamically unstable AF, initiation of anticoagulation should not delay DC cardioversion. It is reasonable to consider administering intravenous bolus of unfractionated heparin followed by infusion, or low molecular weight heparin or direct-acting oral anticoagulant and to continue this after cardioversion unless contraindicated.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
hemodynamically stable with left atrial thrombus, or presence of thrombus unknown/duration of AF unknown
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
Rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful.
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used. In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour infusion; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended in all patients with AF due to the high risk of thromboembolic events. The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation should be established before and is recommended to be continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
-- AND --
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion following 3-4 weeks of anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Cardioversion should only be attempted once the patient has been established on anticoagulation with a target INR of 2 to 3 for 3-4 weeks, and following a repeat transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), if available, to confirm left atrial thrombus. If TEE cannot be performed, the patient should be treated as for presumed thrombus and recommendations for confirmed left atrial thrombus should be followed.[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]: Transesophageal echocardiogram showing left atrial appendage clot. LA=left atrium; LAA=left atrial appendage; LV=left ventricleFrom the collection of Dr Bharat Kantharia [Citation ends].
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, a prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Anticoagulation is continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
OR
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
OR
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
rate control with beta-blocker, digoxin, or amiodarone
Beta-blockers, digoxin, or amiodarone may be used for rate control in patients with AF and heart failure.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [15]Gorenek B, Halvorsen S, Kudaiberdieva G, et al. Atrial fibrillation in acute heart failure: A position statement from the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association and European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Jun;9(4):348-57. https://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article/9/4/348/5950241 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976747?tool=bestpractice.com These drugs may be used in combination or as monotherapy.
Choice of pharmacologic agent/s in patients with heart failure is dictated by the degree of heart failure and type of heart failure (i.e., reduced or preserved ejection fraction [EF]). Drugs that potentially accentuate cardiac contractility are therefore avoided. Thus, calcium-channel blockers, which may be used in heart failure (HF) with preserved EF, are not recommended in patients with reduced EF (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Beta-blockers such as carvedilol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol that are recommended for HF in patients with reduced and preserved EF may be used for rate control as well.
Digoxin is not considered a first-line agent for the purpose of rate control, but it can be useful in patients with heart failure. One study explored whether digoxin use was independently associated with increased mortality in patients with AF; compared with propensity score–matched control participants, the risk of death and sudden death was significantly higher in new digoxin users.[106]Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 13;71(10):1063-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718301037?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29519345?tool=bestpractice.com In patients with AF taking digoxin, the risk of death was independently related to serum digoxin concentration and was highest in patients with concentrations of ≥1.2 ng/mL (≥1.54 nmol/L).[106]Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 13;71(10):1063-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718301037?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29519345?tool=bestpractice.com
In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
digoxin: 0.25 to 0.5 mg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 0.25 mg every 6 hours (maximum 1.5 mg/24 hours), then 0.0625 to 0.25 mg orally once daily
OR
amiodarone: 150-300 mg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 10-50 mg/hour infusion over 24 hours, then 100-200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended in all patients with AF due to the high risk of thromboembolic events. The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3- 4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation should be established prior to and should be continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
-- AND --
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion following 3-4 weeks of anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Cardioversion should only be attempted once the patient has been established on anticoagulation with a target INR of 2 to 3 for 3-4 weeks, and following a repeat transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), if available, to confirm left atrial thrombus. If TEE cannot be performed, the patient should be treated as for presumed thrombus and recommendations for confirmed left atrial thrombus should be followed.[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]: Transesophageal echocardiogram showing left atrial appendage clot. LA=left atrium; LAA=left atrial appendage; LV=left ventricleFrom the collection of Dr Bharat Kantharia [Citation ends].
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, a prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Anticoagulation should be established before cardioversion and is recommended to continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
hemodynamically stable without left atrial thrombus: symptom onset <48 hours
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
Rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful.
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used. In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour infusion; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Patients with low thromboembolic risk presenting with new-onset AF within 48 hours can undergo immediate cardioversion without the need for anticoagulation. There is no significant difference in terms of outcome between DC and pharmacologic cardioversion. Timing of cardioversion in patients who are hemodynamically stable and minimally symptomatic is a topic of research. Some studies suggest no benefit of early cardioversion over a "wait and see" approach; others suggest outcomes are improved when cardioversion is performed early.[107]Pope MK, Hall TS, Schirripa V, et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021 Oct 27;375:e066450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548918 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706884?tool=bestpractice.com [108]Pluymaekers NAHA, Dudink EAMP, Luermans JGLM, et al. Early or delayed cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1499-1508. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1906729 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883054?tool=bestpractice.com
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
OR
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
OR
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
Rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful.
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used. In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour infusion; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion + heparin
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Intravenous heparin (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] of 45-60 seconds) or subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin should be started before cardioversion. There is no significant difference in terms of outcome between DC and pharmacologic cardioversion. Timing of cardioversion in patients who are hemodynamically stable and minimally symptomatic is a topic of research. Some studies suggest no benefit of early cardioversion over a "wait and see" approach; others suggest outcomes are improved when cardioversion is performed early.[107]Pope MK, Hall TS, Schirripa V, et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021 Oct 27;375:e066450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548918 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706884?tool=bestpractice.com [108]Pluymaekers NAHA, Dudink EAMP, Luermans JGLM, et al. Early or delayed cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1499-1508. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1906729 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883054?tool=bestpractice.com
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3 to 6 hours, prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
or
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
or
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
or
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
-- AND --
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended in all patients with AF due to the high risk of thromboembolic events. The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation is continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
rate control with beta-blocker, digoxin, or amiodarone
Patients with heart failure are considered at high risk of thromboembolism. Additional risk factors may also be present, including age ≥75 years, structural heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, rheumatic heart disease, prosthetic heart valves, or history of prior thromboembolism, and left ventricular ejection fraction is ≤35%.
Beta-blockers, digoxin, or amiodarone may be used for rate control in patients with AF and heart failure.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [15]Gorenek B, Halvorsen S, Kudaiberdieva G, et al. Atrial fibrillation in acute heart failure: A position statement from the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association and European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Jun;9(4):348-57. https://academic.oup.com/ehjacc/article/9/4/348/5950241 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31976747?tool=bestpractice.com These drugs may be used in combination or as monotherapy.
Choice of pharmacologic agent/s in patients with heart failure is dictated by the degree of heart failure and type of heart failure (i.e., reduced or preserved ejection fraction [EF]). Drugs that potentially accentuate cardiac contractility are therefore avoided. Thus, calcium-channel blockers, which may be used in heart failure (HF) with preserved EF, are not recommended in patients with reduced EF (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Beta-blockers such as carvedilol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol that are recommended for HF in patients with reduced and preserved EF may be used for rate control as well.
Digoxin is not considered a first-line agent for the purpose of rate control, but it can be useful in patients with heart failure. One study explored whether digoxin use was independently associated with increased mortality in patients with AF; compared with propensity score–matched control participants, the risk of death and sudden death was significantly higher in new digoxin users.[106]Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 13;71(10):1063-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718301037?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29519345?tool=bestpractice.com In patients with AF taking digoxin, the risk of death was independently related to serum digoxin concentration and was highest in patients with concentrations of ≥1.2 ng/mL (≥1.54 nmol/L).[106]Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 13;71(10):1063-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718301037?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29519345?tool=bestpractice.com
In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
digoxin: 0.25 to 0.5 mg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 0.25 mg every 6 hours (maximum 1.5 mg/24 hours), then 0.0625 to 0.25 mg orally once daily
OR
amiodarone: 150-300 mg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 10-50 mg/hour infusion over 24 hours, then 100-200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion + heparin
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Intravenous heparin (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] of 45-60 seconds) or subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin should be started before cardioversion. There is no significant difference in terms of outcome between DC and pharmacologic cardioversion. Timing of cardioversion in patients who are hemodynamically stable and minimally symptomatic is a topic of research. Some studies suggest no benefit of early cardioversion over a "wait and see" approach; others suggest outcomes are improved when cardioversion is performed early.[107]Pope MK, Hall TS, Schirripa V, et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021 Oct 27;375:e066450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548918 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706884?tool=bestpractice.com [108]Pluymaekers NAHA, Dudink EAMP, Luermans JGLM, et al. Early or delayed cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1499-1508. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1906729 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883054?tool=bestpractice.com
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
or
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
-- AND --
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended in all patients with AF due to the high risk of thromboembolic events. The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation is continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
hemodynamically stable without left atrial thrombus: symptom onset ≥48 hours
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
Rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful.
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used. In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour infusion; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
heparin
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Heparin (unfractionated or low molecular weight) should be started, and cardioversion should be delayed until the patient is established on heparin with a target activated partial thromboplastin time of 45-60 seconds.
Primary options
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
OR
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion once heparin anticoagulation established
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Cardioversion may be carried out once heparin is established provided the transesophageal echocardiogram is negative. There is no significant difference in terms of outcome between DC and pharmacologic cardioversion. Timing of cardioversion in patients who are hemodynamically stable and minimally symptomatic is a topic of research. Some studies suggest no benefit of early cardioversion over a "wait and see" approach; others suggest outcomes are improved when cardioversion is performed early.[107]Pope MK, Hall TS, Schirripa V, et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021 Oct 27;375:e066450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548918 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706884?tool=bestpractice.com [108]Pluymaekers NAHA, Dudink EAMP, Luermans JGLM, et al. Early or delayed cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1499-1508. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1906729 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883054?tool=bestpractice.com
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
OR
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
OR
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
Rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful.
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used. In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended in all patients with AF due to the high risk of thromboembolic events. The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation should be established before and is recommended to be continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
-- AND --
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion following 3-4 weeks of anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Cardioversion should only be attempted once the patient has been established on anticoagulation with a target INR of 2 to 3 for 3-4 weeks.
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, a prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Anticoagulation is continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
OR
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
OR
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
rate control with beta-blocker, digoxin, or amiodarone
Patients with heart failure are considered at high risk of thromboembolism. Additional risk factors may also be present, including age ≥75 years, structural heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, rheumatic heart disease, prosthetic heart valves, or history of prior thromboembolism, and left ventricular ejection fraction is ≤35%.
Beta-blockers, digoxin, or amiodarone may be used for rate control in patients with AF and heart failure.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com These drugs may be used in combination or as monotherapy.
Choice of pharmacologic agent/s in patients with heart failure is dictated by the degree of heart failure and type of heart failure (i.e., reduced or preserved ejection fraction [EF]). Drugs that potentially accentuate cardiac contractility are therefore avoided. Thus, calcium-channel blockers, which may be used in heart failure (HF) with preserved EF, are not recommended in patients with reduced EF (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]). Beta-blockers such as carvedilol, metoprolol, and bisoprolol that are recommended for HF in patients with reduced and preserved EF may be used for rate control as well.
Digoxin is not considered a first-line agent for the purpose of rate control, but it can be useful in patients with heart failure. One study explored whether digoxin use was independently associated with increased mortality in patients with AF; compared with propensity score–matched control participants, the risk of death and sudden death was significantly higher in new digoxin users.[106]Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 13;71(10):1063-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718301037?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29519345?tool=bestpractice.com In patients with AF taking digoxin, the risk of death was independently related to serum digoxin concentration and was highest in patients with concentrations of ≥1.2 ng/mL (≥1.54 nmol/L).[106]Lopes RD, Rordorf R, De Ferrari GM, et al; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Digoxin and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Mar 13;71(10):1063-74. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109718301037?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29519345?tool=bestpractice.com
In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
digoxin: 0.25 to 0.5 mg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 0.25 mg every 6 hours (maximum 1.5 mg/24 hours), then 0.0625 to 0.25 mg orally once daily
OR
amiodarone: 150-300 mg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 10-50 mg/hour infusion over 24 hours, then 100-200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended in all patients with AF due to the high risk of thromboembolic events. The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation should be established before and is recommended to be continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
-- AND --
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion following 3-4 weeks of anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Cardioversion should only be attempted once the patient has been established on anticoagulation with a target INR of 2 to 3 for 3-4 weeks.
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, a prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Anticoagulation is continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
hemodynamically stable without left atrial thrombus: asymptomatic
observation
Most cases of new-onset AF revert to sinus rhythm spontaneously. Cases that revert spontaneously usually do so in the first 24 hours.[105]Prystowsky EN, Benson DW Jr, Fuster V, et al. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1262-77. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1262 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8653857?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients should be observed to see whether AF resolves spontaneously.
In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed, and AF is less likely to resolve spontaneously, if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
If AF does not resolve spontaneously, rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful. However, rate- and rhythm-control strategies have comparable clinical outcomes in many patients with AF; shared decision-making with the patient is recommended.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used.
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour infusion; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation should be established before cardioversion (in patients who require cardioversion) and is continued for at least 4 weeks afterward, and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
-- AND --
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
If AF does not resolve spontaneously, cardioversion should only be attempted once the patient has been established on anticoagulation. If there is evidence of LA thrombus on TEE, or the presence of thrombus is unknown or the duration of AF is unknown or for 48 hours or more, all eligible patients should preferably be put on a DOAC for at least 3-6 weeks; after this, imaging such as TEE should be repeated to rule out intracardiac thrombus before elective cardioversion.
There is no significant difference in terms of outcome between DC and pharmacologic cardioversion. Timing of cardioversion in patients who are hemodynamically stable and minimally symptomatic is a topic of research. Some studies suggest no benefit of early cardioversion over a "wait and see" approach; others suggest outcomes are improved when cardioversion is performed early.[107]Pope MK, Hall TS, Schirripa V, et al. Cardioversion in patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: observational study using prospectively collected registry data. BMJ. 2021 Oct 27;375:e066450. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548918 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706884?tool=bestpractice.com [108]Pluymaekers NAHA, Dudink EAMP, Luermans JGLM, et al. Early or delayed cardioversion in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1499-1508. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1906729 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883054?tool=bestpractice.com
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
OR
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
OR
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
anticoagulation or left atrial appendage occlusion
Patients with higher thromboembolic risk require immediate anticoagulation.
The key options for anticoagulation are a vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin, or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban. DOACs are approved for stroke prevention and have a more favorable side-effect profile than vitamin K antagonists in patients with nonvalvular AF.
In patients with AF who are candidates for anticoagulation and do not have either moderate-severe rheumatic mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valves, DOACs are recommended over warfarin to reduce the risk of mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and intracranial hemorrhage.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com If CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is ≥2, all eligible patients should preferably be started on a DOAC.
DOACs should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment. If a DOAC is suitable, depending on the degree of renal impairment and the indication for use, a dose adjustment may be required. Consult the prescribing information for specific guidance on use in patients with renal impairment.
DOACs should not be used in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, due to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack, and blood clot in these patients, nor should they be used in combination with heparin (including low molecular weight heparin), heparin derivatives, or warfarin.[111]Alpert JS. Take-home messages from the recently updated AHA/ACC guidelines for atrial fibrillation. Am J Med. 2019 Dec;132(12):1363-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401166?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with diabetes are at risk of complications of diabetes when treated with oral anticoagulants; this risk seems to be lower with DOACs compared with vitamin K antagonists. Dabigatran is favored for its efficacy and lower rates of adverse effects in this patient group.[132]Jin H, Zhu K, Wang L, et al. A network meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and diabetes mellitus. Acta Cardiol. 2021 Nov;76(9):960-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432890?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Huang HK, Liu PP, Lin SM, et al. Diabetes-related complications and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):490-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157495?tool=bestpractice.com
In DOAC-ineligible patients, start concomitant heparin and warfarin therapy, and continue heparin until the warfarin levels are therapeutic (INR 2-3). Anticoagulation with warfarin at the target INR should be established for 3-4 weeks before cardioversion is attempted.
Anticoagulation is continued for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion (in patients who require cardioversion), and may be required for longer in some patients.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
In the setting of AF, the left atrial appendage can play a role in blood stasis and clot formation, and consequently be a source of emboli.[11]Katsanos AH, Kamel H, Healey JS, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: looking forward. Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2371-88. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049768 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33315494?tool=bestpractice.com Although oral anticoagulation is the standard of care to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AF, it is contraindicated in some patients due to an excess risk of major bleeding.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com
Left atrial appendage occlusion may be considered as an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with a moderate to high risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2) when there are absolute contraindications to the use of anticoagulants (due to a nonreversible cause), or the risk of bleeding outweighs the benefits.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003?login=false [18]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [136]Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheter-based left atrial appendage occlusion - an update. Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):184. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/2/184/5557705 For more information on this treatment see Established atrial fibrillation.
Primary options
dabigatran etexilate: 150 mg orally twice daily
OR
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
OR
edoxaban: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
heparin: see local protocol for dosing guidelines, maintain activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 45-60 seconds
or
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours
-- AND --
warfarin: 2-5 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can also be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. WarfarinDosing.org Opens in new window
observation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Most cases of new-onset AF revert to sinus rhythm spontaneously. Cases that revert spontaneously usually do so in the first 24 hours.[105]Prystowsky EN, Benson DW Jr, Fuster V, et al. Management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1996 Mar 15;93(6):1262-77. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.cir.93.6.1262 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8653857?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients should be observed to see whether AF resolves spontaneously.
In addition, identification and treatment of any potential triggers of new-onset AF is very important, because rate and rhythm control measures are less likely to succeed, and AF is less likely to resolve spontaneously, if the acute precipitant persists.[43]Chyou JY, Barkoudah E, Dukes JW, et al. Atrial fibrillation occurring during acute hospitalization: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Apr 11;147(15):e676-98. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912134?tool=bestpractice.com
rate control with beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
If AF does not resolve spontaneously, rate-control therapy is required until cardioversion is successful.
Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem or verapamil) slow atrioventricular nodal conduction of cardiac impulses and subsequently reduce ventricular rate.
Intravenous administration may be necessary for rapid control of ventricular rate. Furthermore, in the event of hemodynamic adverse effects, the infusion may be discontinued promptly.
Beta-blockers are particularly useful when new-onset AF is associated with an acute myocardial infarction or angina, and when new-onset AF is precipitated after exercise.
Esmolol is useful in patients at risk of complications from beta-blockade, particularly those with reactive airway disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and/or peripheral vascular disease.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are useful in ventricular rate control in the absence of preexcitation. They provide reasonable rate control and also improve AF-related symptoms compared with beta-blockers.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com They are preferred in patients with chronic lung disease where bronchospasm may occur with beta-blockers.
Both groups of medications may cause severe bradycardia, heart block, asystole, heart failure, or hypotension.
If rate control is inadequate with monotherapy, a combination of a beta-blocker and CCB may be used.
[ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Primary options
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 50-300 micrograms/kg/minute infusion
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenous bolus initially, may repeat every 5 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 25-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
propranolol hydrochloride: 1 mg intravenously initially, may repeat every 2 minutes to a total of 3 doses; 10-40 mg orally (immediate-release) three to four times daily
OR
atenolol: 25-100 mg orally once daily
OR
nadolol: 10-240 mg orally once daily
OR
bisoprolol: 2.5 to 10 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 to 25 mg orally twice daily
OR
diltiazem: 0.25 mg/kg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second bolus of 0.35 mg/kg after 15 minutes if necessary, followed by 5-15 mg/hour infusion; 120-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenous bolus initially, may give a second and third bolus of 5-10 mg after 15-30 minutes, followed by 5-20 mg/hour infusion; 180-480 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
If AF does not resolve spontaneously, cardioversion should only be attempted once the patient has been established on anticoagulation. If there is evidence of LA thrombus on TEE, or the presence of thrombus is unknown or the duration of AF is unknown or for 48 hours or more, all eligible patients should preferably be put on a DOAC for at least 3-6 weeks; after this, imaging such as TEE should be repeated to rule out intracardiac thrombus before elective cardioversion.
DC cardioversion is fast, safe, and efficient.
Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) have a higher mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are contraindicated in patients with CAD and cardiac dysfunction. AF may convert to atrial flutter that may conduct with rapid ventricular rate.
Flecainide has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (odds ratio [OR] 24.7, 95% CI 9.0 to 68.3). High conversion rate of about 70% at 3 hours after treatment and up to 90% at 8 hours.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Propafenone also has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.6 to 8.2). High conversion rates of up to 76% at 8 hours after treatment.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Class III agents (including amiodarone and ibutilide) are less efficacious than class IC agents in conversion to sinus rhythm.
To improve success of restoration of sinus rhythm and its maintenance, especially in patients with persistent AF, pre-treatment with amiodarone 1-6 weeks before electrical cardioversion may be considered.[1]Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jan 2;149(1):e1-156. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38033089?tool=bestpractice.com [151]Um KJ, McIntyre WF, Healey JS, et al. Pre- and post-treatment with amiodarone for elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2019 Jun 1;21(6):856-63. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/21/6/856/5380134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875422?tool=bestpractice.com
Ibutilide prolongs repolarization of the atrial tissue by enhancing the slow inward depolarizing Na+ current in the plateau phase of repolarization. Up to 70% of all conversions occur within 20 minutes of infusion. It has strong evidence of efficacy for pharmacologic conversion (OR 29.1, 95% CI 9.8 to 86.1). Conversion rates are between 33% and 45% within the first 70 minutes. Because the half-life of ibutilide is 3-6 hours, prolonged observation period is recommended in patients who have received ibutilide.[150]Miller MR, McNamara RL, Segal JB, et al. Efficacy of agents for pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation and subsequent maintenance of sinus rhythm: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):1033-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11093570?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
flecainide: body weight <70 kg: 200 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 300 mg orally as a single dose
OR
propafenone: body weight <70 kg: 450 mg orally as a single dose; body weight ≥70 kg: 600 mg orally as a single dose
OR
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenously initially over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute infusion for 6 hours, and then 0.5 mg/minute infusion for 18 hours; 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses up to a total loading dose of up to 10 g, followed by 200 mg orally once daily
More amiodaroneDose regimens may vary for amiodarone; consult local guidance for further information.
OR
ibutilide: body weight <60 kg: 0.01 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose; adults body weight ≥60 kg: 1 mg intravenously as a single dose; may repeat dose after 10 minutes if no response
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer