Chancroid was endemic worldwide until the 20th century, but is now most common in the Caribbean, Africa, Asia (except Thailand), and Latin America. There were an estimated 7 million new cases in the world during 1995; however, due to difficulties in diagnosis and reporting, the true number is unknown.[10]World Health Organization. Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted diseases: overview and estimates. 1995 [internet publication].
http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/65969
[11]Steen R. Eradicating chancroid. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(9):818-26.
https://scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11584729?tool=bestpractice.com
The prevalence of chancroid has significantly declined in some countries, which is thought to be due to the therapeutic syndromic management of genital ulcer disease and significant social change.[9]González-Beiras C, Marks M, Chen CY, et al. Epidemiology of Haemophilus ducreyi infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jan;22(1):1-8.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/1/15-0425_article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694983?tool=bestpractice.com
In the US, the prevalence peaked in 1947 with over 9500 cases and has since declined dramatically.[12]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted infections surveillance, 2023. Nov 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.cdc.gov/sti-statistics/annual/index.html
In 2023, only four cases of chancroid were reported in the US. However, data informing national trends should be interpreted with caution as Haemophilus ducreyi infections may be underdiagnosed in areas where diagnostic capacity with culture is limited or not undertaken.[13]Ogale YP, Ridpath AD, Torrone E, et al. A sore subject? an examination of national case-based chancroid surveillance. Sex Transm Dis. 2023 Aug 1;50(8):467-71.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10523871
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37010821?tool=bestpractice.com
Periodic spikes in chancroid incidence have been attributed to a concurrent increase in the number of syphilis cases, use of cocaine, and exchange of sex for drugs.[2]Trees DL, Morse SA. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi: an update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jul;8(3):357-75.
http://cmr.asm.org/content/8/3/357.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7553570?tool=bestpractice.com
[14]Adams DA, Thomas KR, Jajosky RA, et al; Nationally Notifiable Infectious Conditions Group, CDC. Summary of notifiable infectious diseases and conditions - United States, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Aug 11;64(53):1-143.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/64/wr/mm6453a1.htm?s_cid=mm6453a1_w
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28796757?tool=bestpractice.com
Studies have shown that the minimum number of partners to maintain chancroid in a population is 15 to 20 per year.[11]Steen R. Eradicating chancroid. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(9):818-26.
https://scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11584729?tool=bestpractice.com
The exact rate of transmission per sexual act is thought to be high but is not known. The probability of transmission from a single exposure has been estimated to be 0.35.[15]Spinola, SM. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, et al, eds. Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2008:689-700.
In Thailand, a 100% condom use policy and presumptive treatment of sex workers in commercial sex establishments has been very effective; no cases of chancroid have been reported since 1998. In Africa, where rates of circumcision are low and incidence of HIV is high, chancroid remains endemic. The prevalence is lower in countries with a higher use of condoms (e.g., Kenya), and with regular examination and treatment of sex workers. Syndromic treatment of genital ulcer disease (simultaneous treatment of all potential co-infections) has been implemented in several regions, such as Senegal and India, successfully reducing the incidence.[11]Steen R. Eradicating chancroid. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(9):818-26.
https://scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11584729?tool=bestpractice.com
[16]Sharma VK, Khandpur S. Changing patterns of sexually transmitted infections in India. Natl Med J India. 2004 Nov-Dec;17(6):310-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15736552?tool=bestpractice.com
The male to female ratio of infection is 3:1 in endemic areas and 25:1 in outbreaks in developed countries. Asymptomatic carriage is thought to be rare.[17]Morse SA. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):137-57.
http://cmr.asm.org/content/2/2/137.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2650859?tool=bestpractice.com
H ducreyi has also been described as a cause of non-sexually transmitted cutaneous skin ulcers in the South Pacific and Africa. Epidemiological surveys to evaluate yaws elimination programmes in yaws-endemic areas have revealed H ducreyi to be an aetiological agent of limb ulcers.[3]Roberts SA, Taylor SL. Haemophilus ducreyi: a newly recognised cause of chronic skin ulceration. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Apr;2(4):e187-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25103048?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Mitjà O, Lukehart SA, Pokowas G, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi as a cause of skin ulcers in children from a yaws-endemic area of Papua New Guinea: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Apr;2(4):e235-41.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25103064?tool=bestpractice.com
[5]Spinola SM. Haemophilus ducreyi as a cause of skin ulcers. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jul;2(7):e387.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25103386?tool=bestpractice.com
[6]Marks M, Chi KH, Vahi V, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi associated with skin ulcers among children, Solomon Islands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Oct;20(10):1705-7.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/10/14-0573_article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25271477?tool=bestpractice.com
[7]Gangaiah D, Webb KM, Humphreys TL, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi cutaneous ulcer strains are nearly identical to class I genital ulcer strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jul 6;9(7):e0003918.
http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0003918
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26147869?tool=bestpractice.com
[8]Lewis DA, Mitjà O. Haemophilus ducreyi: from sexually transmitted infection to skin ulcer pathogen. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb;29(1):52-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26658654?tool=bestpractice.com
[9]González-Beiras C, Marks M, Chen CY, et al. Epidemiology of Haemophilus ducreyi infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jan;22(1):1-8.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/1/15-0425_article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26694983?tool=bestpractice.com
[18]Grant JC, González-Beiras C, Amick KM, et al. Multiple class I and class II Haemophilus ducreyi strains cause cutaneous ulcers in children on an endemic island. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;67(11):1768-74.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233678
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897409?tool=bestpractice.com
Studies in both Papua New Guinea and Cameroon have found H ducreyi DNA on the skin of asymptomatic children, in flies, and on fomites.[19]Houinei W, Godornes C, Kapa A, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi DNA is detectable on the skin of asymptomatic children, flies and fomites in villages of Papua New Guinea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 May 10;11(5):e0004958.
http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004958
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489855?tool=bestpractice.com
[20]Ndzomo P, Tchatchouang S, Njih Tabah E, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Haemophilus ducreyi cutaneous ulcers in Cameroon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Dec;17(12):e0011553.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10791135
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38150487?tool=bestpractice.com
The ubiquitous nature of H ducreyi in endemic regions warrants further evaluation.[18]Grant JC, González-Beiras C, Amick KM, et al. Multiple class I and class II Haemophilus ducreyi strains cause cutaneous ulcers in children on an endemic island. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;67(11):1768-74.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233678
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897409?tool=bestpractice.com
[19]Houinei W, Godornes C, Kapa A, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi DNA is detectable on the skin of asymptomatic children, flies and fomites in villages of Papua New Guinea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 May 10;11(5):e0004958.
http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0004958
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28489855?tool=bestpractice.com
Strains of H ducreyi isolated from cutaneous ulcerations have genome sequences similar to clade I and clade II strains of H ducreyi, which cause genital ulcerations.[7]Gangaiah D, Webb KM, Humphreys TL, et al. Haemophilus ducreyi cutaneous ulcer strains are nearly identical to class I genital ulcer strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jul 6;9(7):e0003918.
http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0003918
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26147869?tool=bestpractice.com
[18]Grant JC, González-Beiras C, Amick KM, et al. Multiple class I and class II Haemophilus ducreyi strains cause cutaneous ulcers in children on an endemic island. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 13;67(11):1768-74.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6233678
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29897409?tool=bestpractice.com
[21]Marks M, Fookes M, Wagner J, et al. Direct whole-genome sequencing of cutaneous strains of Haemophilus ducreyi. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Apr;24(4):786-789.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5875288
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29553314?tool=bestpractice.com
[22]Gangaiah D, Spinola SM. Haemophilus ducreyi cutaneous ulcer strains diverged from both class I and class II genital ulcer strains: implications for epidemiological studies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Dec;10(12):e0005259.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5222509
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28027326?tool=bestpractice.com