Treatment algorithm

Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer

ACUTE

localised: suitable for surgery

1st line – surgery

Back
ACUTE
|
localised: suitable for surgery
1st line – 

surgery

Multi-disciplinary evaluation is strongly encouraged before therapy is started.[26][27]

Surgery is the primary treatment option for patients with localised (T1b-T2, N0) gastric cancer, with a goal of complete resection with negative margins.[26][27] Patients with carcinoma in situ (Tis) or T1a tumours may be candidates for endoscopic therapies.[26]

The aim is complete resection of the primary tumour with negative margins.[26] Subtotal gastrectomy is the preferred approach for distal gastric cancer.[26] Patients undergoing total gastrectomy for distal gastric cancers have no survival benefit compared with those undergoing subtotal gastrectomy.[34][35] Proximal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy is usually recommended for patients with proximal tumours.[26]

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) suggests surgery over endoscopic approaches for lesions that are poorly differentiated and of any size; however, surgery is not recommended in early-stage lesions that are well- or moderately differentiated, intestinal type, and measure ≤3 cm.[36]

Patients with superficial early gastric cancer (T1a) can be treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).[26] Appropriate candidates for EMR are those with adenocarcinoma confined to the mucosa, <2 cm in diameter, low or moderate degree of differentiation, without evidence of ulcer, and with no lymphovascular involvement.[37][38][39]

The factors to consider while choosing between ESD and EMR as per ASGE include differentiation (well or moderate vs. poor), morphology (ulcerated vs. non-ulcerated), type of cancer (intestinal vs. diffuse), and size.[36]​ Either ESD or EMR can be used in early-stage, well- or moderately differentiated, non-ulcerated, intestinal type gastric cancers measuring <20 mm, while ESD is preferred over EMR in well- or moderately differentiated lesions measuring 20-30 mm, with or without ulceration.[36]

Extent of lymph node dissection is controversial. Studies have failed to show survival benefit between D1 dissection (dissection of the perigastric nodes) and D2 dissection (dissection of perigastric nodes and nodes along the left gastric, hepatic, coeliac, and splenic arteries). D2 dissection may be associated with lower rates of locoregional recurrence and gastric cancer-related death, but may also be associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality. A modified (spleen-preserving) D2 dissection is considered a standard at many institutions. The addition of para-aortic dissection to D2 dissection does not improve survival.[40][41][42] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ]

Short-term outcomes from randomised controlled trials suggest that laparoscopic gastrectomy for clinical stage 1 gastric cancer is safe and has the benefit of lower occurrence of wound complication compared with conventional open gastrectomy, although evidence is low quality.[43][44][45] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ] Other studies show no difference in short-term mortality between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy and no evidence for any differences in short-term or long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy, based on low-quality evidence.[46]

Consider – perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy

Back
ACUTE
|
localised: suitable for surgery
Consider – 

perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Patients with more advanced disease (T2 or higher, and any N) should be offered perioperative chemotherapy in addition to gastrectomy.[26][27] Perioperative chemotherapy has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with stage 2 or higher disease, compared with surgery alone.[53][54] The preferred regimen for most patients with good-to-moderate performance status is FLOT (fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, docetaxel).[26] Fluorouracil plus cisplatin is an alternative regimen.[26] FLOT is associated with better outcomes in patients with resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer treatment compared with other regimens.[55]

Postoperative chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin is indicated for patients who have undergone gastrectomy with primary D2 lymph node dissection.[26]

Folinic acid is indicated with certain fluorouracil-based regimens. Depending on availability, the regimens may be used with or without folinic acid.[26]

See local specialist protocols for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

Perioperative chemotherapy

fluorouracil

and

folinic acid

and

oxaliplatin

and

docetaxel

OR

Perioperative chemotherapy

fluorouracil

and

cisplatin

OR

Postoperative chemotherapy

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

Consider – postoperative chemoradiotherapy

Back
ACUTE
|
localised: suitable for surgery
Consider – 

postoperative chemoradiotherapy

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients who have undergone gastrectomy with limited (D0 or D1) lymph node dissection. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy is associated with a significantly lower local recurrence rate in this group of patients, compared with surgery alone.[47][48][49]​ The preferred regimen is radiotherapy and fluorouracil or capecitabine.[26]

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy has not been shown to reduce local recurrence rates in patients who have undergone gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection; these patients should be offered postoperative chemotherapy instead.[26][47][50]

Adverse effects of radiotherapy include nausea, vomiting (patients may need to be pre-treated with anti-emetics prior to radiation), weight loss, and diarrhoea. Less commonly, radiation can cause small bowel obstruction, liver damage, and kidney damage.

Folinic acid is indicated with certain fluorouracil-based regimens. Depending on availability, the regimens may be used with or without folinic acid.[26]

See local specialist protocols for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

fluorouracil

OR

capecitabine

localised: not suitable for surgery

1st line – chemoradiotherapy

Back
ACUTE
|
localised: not suitable for surgery
1st line – 

chemoradiotherapy

Patients with localised disease who are not surgical candidates should be offered chemoradiotherapy. The preferred regimens consist of radiotherapy and fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin.[26] Other recommended regimens include a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus paclitaxel.

Overall survival is higher in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy than in patients treated with radiotherapy alone.[51][52]

Adverse effects of radiation include nausea, vomiting (patients may need to be pre-treated with anti-emetics prior to radiation), weight loss, and diarrhoea. Less commonly, radiation can cause small bowel obstruction, liver damage, and kidney damage.

Folinic acid is indicated with certain fluorouracil-based regimens. Depending on availability, the regimens may be used with or without folinic acid.[26]

See local specialist protocols for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

fluorouracil

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

OR

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

paclitaxel

advanced and metastatic disease

1st line – chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

Back
ACUTE
|
advanced and metastatic disease
1st line – 

chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

Chemotherapy improves quality of life and survival when compared with best supportive care in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.[56][57][58] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ] Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is associated with improved survival, compared with chemotherapy alone, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.[59][60][61][62][63]

Chemotherapy regimens should be chosen in the context of the patient's performance status (PS), medical comorbidities, toxicity profile, and tumour biomarker expression.[26] First-line treatment differs based on tumour HER2 expression.

Two-drug cytotoxic regimens are preferred for patients with advanced disease because of lower toxicity; three-drug regimens are reserved for medically fit patients with good PS and access to frequent toxicity evaluation.[26]

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors, combined with fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy, is specifically preferred for HER2-negative tumours expressing PD-L1 having a combined positive score of 1+.[26]​ First-line options include: a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin plus nivolumab; a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin plus pembrolizumab; or a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin plus tislelizumab.[26]

​​The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends nivolumab for tumours expressing PD-L1 having a combined positive score of 5+, and pembrolizumab for tumours expressing PD-L1 having a combined positive score of 10+, in combination with platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.[64]

Alternatively, a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin (without an immune checkpoint inhibitor) is recommended.[26]

A fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin plus zolbetuximab (an anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody) is recommended for first-line treatment of CLDN18.2 positive, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.[26]​ 

Studies have demonstrated that fluorouracil can be replaced by capecitabine, and cisplatin by oxaliplatin, except in regimens including irinotecan.[26][65][66]​​​​ Oxaliplatin is preferred over cisplatin owing to its lower toxicity.[26][65][67]​​​​ Leucovorin is indicated with certain fluorouracil-based regimens. Depending on availability, the regimens may be used with or without leucovorin.[26]

First-line treatment for HER2 over-expression positive metastatic disease is trastuzumab (a humanised monoclonal antibody that acts on the HER2 receptor) added to chemotherapy.[26] This combination has been shown to improve overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer.[59] A fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin or cisplatin plus trastuzumab plus pembrolizumab is the recommended first-line therapy for tumours expressing PD-L1 having a combined positive score of 1+.[26] Oxaliplatin is preferred over cisplatin owing to its lower toxicity.[26]

Folinic acid is indicated with certain fluorouracil-based regimens. Depending on availability, the regimens may be used with or without folinic acid.[26]

Pembrolizumab and dostarlimab are anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies that may be considered for patients with high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency (MSI-H/dMMR) tumours.[26] Other options for MSI-H/dMMR tumours include nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) plus oxaliplatin plus nivolumab or pembrolizumab.

Alternative first-line regimens for patients with HER2 overexpression negative adenocarcinoma, HER2 overexpression positive adenocarcinoma, or MSI-H/dMMR tumours include: fluorouracil plus irinotecan; docetaxel with or without cisplatin; paclitaxel with or without carboplatin or cisplatin; fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) monotherapy; or docetaxel plus cisplatin or oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil.[26]

In patients with peritoneal carcinoma as the only disease, intraperitoneal chemotherapy/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be considered.[26]

The tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib may be considered for patients with neurotrophic tropomyosin-related kinase (NTRK) gene fusion positive tumours.[26]

See local specialist protocols for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

HER2-negative disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

-- AND --

nivolumab

OR

HER2-negative disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

-- AND --

pembrolizumab

OR

HER2-negative disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

-- AND --

tislelizumab

OR

HER2-negative disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

OR

CLDN18.2 positive disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

-- AND --

zolbetuximab

OR

HER2-positive disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

-- AND --

trastuzumab

OR

HER2-positive disease

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

-- AND --

trastuzumab

-- AND --

pembrolizumab

OR

MSI-H/dMMR tumours

pembrolizumab

OR

MSI-H/dMMR tumours

dostarlimab

OR

MSI-H/dMMR tumours

nivolumab

and

ipilimumab

OR

MSI-H/dMMR tumours

fluorouracil

or

capecitabine

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

-- AND --

nivolumab

or

pembrolizumab

OR

NTRK gene fusion positive tumours

entrectinib

OR

NTRK gene fusion positive tumours

larotrectinib

OR

NTRK gene fusion positive tumours

repotrectinib

Secondary options

fluorouracil

and

irinotecan

OR

docetaxel

OR

docetaxel

and

cisplatin

OR

paclitaxel

OR

paclitaxel

-- AND --

carboplatin

or

cisplatin

OR

fluorouracil

OR

capecitabine

OR

fluorouracil

-- AND --

docetaxel

-- AND --

oxaliplatin

or

cisplatin

Plus – best supportive care

Back
ACUTE
|
advanced and metastatic disease
Plus – 

best supportive care

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

The aim of best supportive care is to relieve the patients' symptoms, regardless of the stage of disease, to support the best quality of life for them and their families. For gastric cancer, interventions to relieve major symptoms may prolong life.[26] Endoscopic treatment, interventional radiology, gastrectomy, and chemotherapy may relieve symptoms such as pain, bleeding, nausea and vomiting, and obstruction.[26]

2nd line – alternative chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

Back
ACUTE
|
advanced and metastatic disease
2nd line – 

alternative chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

Second-line and subsequent therapies depend on prior therapy and the patient's performance status. Choice of therapy generally does not depend on tumour HER2 over-expression status (except for trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody-drug conjugate composed of trastuzumab covalently linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor).

Ramucirumab (a vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor) plus paclitaxel is considered a second-line therapy for patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease.[26] In one trial of patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW trial), ramucirumab added to paclitaxel (as a second-line therapy) demonstrated a significant improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival over paclitaxel alone.[68]

Ramucirumab monotherapy has been shown to improve median overall survival in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have disease progression after first-line platinum- or fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy.[69]

Trastuzumab deruxtecan is recommended as second- or third-line treatment for patients with HER2 over-expression positive adenocarcinoma who had received prior trastuzumab-based therapy.[26] Compared with standard therapies, trastuzumab deruxtecan significantly improved response rate and overall survival in one open-label, randomised phase 2 trial of patients with treatment-refractory HER2-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.[70] Myelosuppression and interstitial lung disease were reported in patients receiving the drug.

Other recommended second-line therapies include: monotherapy with docetaxel, paclitaxel, or irinotecan; fluorouracil plus irinotecan; irinotecan plus cisplatin; fluorouracil plus irinotecan plus ramucirumab; irinotecan plus ramucirumab; or docetaxel plus irinotecan.[26] A taxane or irinotecan, as a single agent or in combination, provides a modest improvement in overall survival compared with best supportive care.[71][72]

Folinic acid is indicated with certain fluorouracil-based regimens. Depending on availability, the regimens may be used with or without folinic acid.[26]

See local specialist protocols for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ramucirumab

and

paclitaxel

OR

ramucirumab

OR

docetaxel

OR

paclitaxel

OR

irinotecan

OR

fluorouracil

and

irinotecan

OR

HER2-positive disease

trastuzumab deruxtecan

OR

irinotecan

and

cisplatin

OR

fluorouracil

and

irinotecan

and

ramucirumab

OR

irinotecan

and

ramucirumab

OR

docetaxel

and

irinotecan

Plus – best supportive care

Back
ACUTE
|
advanced and metastatic disease
Plus – 

best supportive care

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

The aim of best supportive care is to relieve the patients' symptoms, regardless of the stage of disease, to support the best quality of life for them and their families. For gastric cancer, interventions to relieve major symptoms may prolong life.[26] Endoscopic treatment, interventional radiology, gastrectomy, and chemotherapy may relieve symptoms such as pain, bleeding, nausea and vomiting, and obstruction.[26]

back arrow

Choose a patient group to see our recommendations

Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer