Tests

1st tests to order

spirometry

Test
Result
Test

Performed in all children with suspected asthma who are able to give repeatable and reproducible results, which is dependent on their level of cooperation and age (typically from age 5 years).[110]​ The European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) have jointly published standardized guidance for performing and interpreting spirometry.[111][112]

An obstructive pattern may be present, suggested by visual scalloping of the expiratory flow-volume loop. Decreases can be observed in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁)/FVC ratio, FEV₁, or mid-flows (maximal expiratory flow at 25% of FVC [MEF25] or forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC [FEF25-75]).

The FEV₁/FVC ratio is normally >0.90 in children.[1] FEV₁ and FEV₁/FVC results below the lower limit of normal (LLN) or below 80% of the predicted value are generally considered suggestive of an asthma diagnosis.[1][8][110]​​​​ The LLNs for spirometry values are age-, height-, and ethnicity-dependent.[110][111][112]​​​

The greater the variations in expiratory lung function, and the more often excess variation is observed, the more confident a clinician can be with the diagnosis of childhood asthma.[1] However, it is important to ensure that apparent variability does not reflect variations in technique over time, because both spirometry and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measures are effort-dependent.

False normal FEV₁/FVC ratios are possible with an incorrect technique, irrespective of age, and normal spirometry results do not automatically exclude asthma.[1][110]

See Diagnostic criteria for more detail.


Spirometry technique and interpretation
Spirometry technique and interpretation

A guide on how to perform and interpret spirometry, including common pitfalls.


Result

may show obstructive pattern

peak expiratory flow (PEF)

Test
Result
Test

An alternative to spirometry where spirometry is not available.

Measurement of the PEF is less reliable than spirometry, but its use is preferred where diagnosis would otherwise rely on symptoms only (see Diagnostic criteria).[1] A PEF lower than the age- and height-predicted normal range may be consistent with airway obstruction.

PEF criteria that suggest excess variability in expiratory lung function when diagnosing asthma in children include: positive bronchodilator responsiveness (≥15%); excessive diurnal variability in twice-daily measurements (>13%); improved lung function after 4 weeks of treatment (≥15%); and excessive variation in lung function between visits (≥15%).[1] Joint British Thoracic Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (BTS/NICE/SIGN) guidance recommends a higher threshold of ≥20%.[8]

In a small proportion of children with poor symptom perception PEF may have a role in ongoing asthma management.

The greater the variations in expiratory lung function, and the more often excess variation is observed, the more confident a clinician can be with the diagnosis of childhood asthma.[1] However, it is important to ensure that apparent variability does not reflect variations in technique over time, because both spirometry and PEF measures are effort-dependent.

When used, record the highest of 3 PEF readings.


Peak flow measurement: animated demonstration
Peak flow measurement: animated demonstration

How to use a peak flow meter to obtain a peak expiratory flow measurement.


Result

may be low; may show excessive variability

response to bronchodilator

Test
Result
Test

Where spirometry is available, bronchodilator response should be assessed in all children with suspected asthma who are old enough to comply.

Response to a beta-2 agonist bronchodilator (>12% improvement from baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) or >10% in the predicted FEV₁) is suggestive of an asthma diagnosis.[1][8]​​​[110][112]​​ Because measures are effort-dependent, ensure that apparent variability does not reflect variations in technique over time. Consider an alternative diagnosis if there is no response.

Note that spirometry is only recommended by the British Thoracic Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (BTS/NICE/SIGN) guideline in children ages 5-11 years if the FeNO level is not elevated or if FeNO testing is not available.[8]

Measurement of the peak expiratory flow (PEF) is an alternative to spirometry where spirometry is not available. Although the PEF is less reliable than spirometry, its use is preferred where diagnosis would otherwise rely on symptoms only.[1] A positive bronchodilator test result is an improvement of ≥15% on PEF testing. Joint BTS/NICE/SIGN guidance recommends a higher threshold of ≥20% for the diagnosis of asthma when using average PEF variability.[8]

Lack of response should be interpreted as evidence of an alternative diagnosis.

More likely to obtain a true positive result if bronchodilator medication is withheld before testing (i.e., short-acting beta-agonist ≥4 hours, long-acting beta agonist 24-48 hours).

Result

shows reversibility

Tests to consider

fractional expired nitric oxide (FeNO)

Test
Result
Test

The role of FeNO differs between guidelines, being used variously for diagnosing asthma, monitoring treatment response, assessing the likelihood of response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), or assessing suitability for biologic therapy.[1][8]​​[110][124][125][126]

Consult local policies for recommendations on use.

GINA guidance states that the main role of FeNO is to help guide treatment decisions in patients with severe asthma.[1]​ They do not recommend using FeNO to confirm or exclude a diagnosis of asthma. However, FeNO testing can be used to diagnose type 2 inflammation and suitability for treatment with biologics in patients with severe asthma receiving high-dose ICS or oral corticosteroids (OCS) (threshold, ≥20 ppb).

The 2020 US National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee (NAEPPCC) only recommend FeNO measurement when the diagnosis of asthma is uncertain in children ages 5-12 years (recommend against testing in children ages 0-4 years) despite a detailed history and diagnostic workup, as well as for ongoing monitoring of control in persistent asthma, provided FeNO is measured frequently and not interpreted in isolation.[126]​ When testing in children ages 5-12 years, levels <20 ppb are considered low and levels >35 ppb are considered high.

The American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommends FeNO measurement in all patients with asthma being considered for treatment, stating that FeNO values can be considered alongside other factors (e.g., exacerbation risk) to guide individual treatment decisions.[124] In their most recent guidance, they do not recommend decision-making thresholds.

Joint British Thoracic Society, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (BTS/NICE/SIGN) guidance recommends testing in children ages 5-11 years with a history suggestive of asthma.[8]​ They recommend making a diagnosis if the FeNO level is ≥35 ppb. Spirometry is recommended if the FeNO level is not elevated or if FeNO testing is not available.

Note that FeNO levels vary with patient factors. Levels are:[1]​ higher in patients with airway eosinophilia due to comorbid type 2 inflammatory conditions (e.g., chronic rhinosinusitis or allergic rhinitis); normal in nonallergic asthma phenotypes (e.g., neutrophilic asthma); lower in smokers, during periods of active bronchoconstriction, and the early phases of an allergic response; and either higher or lower during viral respiratory infections.

During corticosteroid therapy, FeNO is also generally lower in adherent than in nonadherent patients.[127]​ FeNO levels are also influenced by ethnicity.[128]

Result

Elevated (consult local guidelines)

airway challenge tests

Test
Result
Test

Testing is considered in all children able to deliver reproducible spirometry when the diagnosis remains unclear following initial lung function testing.[110] 

Tests are categorized as direct (methacholine, histamine) or indirect (mannitol, hypertonic saline) depending on how they act on airway smooth muscle.

The exact criteria of a positive test depend on the agent and guideline used: for methacholine, a fall in the FEV₁ of ≥20% from baseline indicates a positive result; for mannitol, a ≥15% fall from baseline indicates a positive result.[1][110]

Due to the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness in other chronic respiratory conditions (such as cystic fibrosis), the main value of airway challenge testing may be in its negative predictive value.

Result

FEV₁ decreased

exercise challenge test

Test
Result
Test

GINA considers a decrease in FEV₁ of >12% predicted, or a decrease in peak expiratory flow of >15% from baseline, to be significant and is consistent with a diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.[1]​​

European Respiratory Society pediatric guidelines state that a decrease in FEV₁ of >10% from baseline constitutes a positive test.[110]

Spirometry is measured at baseline and every 5 minutes after challenge for a total of 20 minutes. Exercise challenge testing should be considered in children from 5 years of age with exercise-related symptoms if asthma diagnosis cannot be confirmed with first-line tests.[110] The exercise challenge should be performed according to the recommended guidelines.

Result

FEV₁ or peak expiratory flow may be decreased

CBC

Test
Result
Test

Eosinophilia (coupled with aeroallergen sensitization) can help guide treatment and may identify children likely to benefit from a daily ICS.[52][53][146][147]​​

Result

possible eosinophilia

sweat test

Test
Result
Test

May be used to distinguish the presence of cystic fibrosis.

Sweat chloride 60 mEq/L or greater on repeat samples is diagnostic of cystic fibrosis. Values of >30 mEq/L are borderline.

Result

normal

sputum culture

Test
Result
Test

May be ordered when suspicion of bacterial lung infection exists.

Result

may grow bacteria with infection

skin prick testing

Test
Result
Test

May be used to support the presence of an atopic state.

Should not be used to diagnose asthma.[110]

Result

may be abnormal

chest x-ray

Test
Result
Test

May show hyperinflation. Helps distinguish from other cardiac and pulmonary diseases such as cardiac failure, bronchiectasis (when severe), or situs inversus. Do not routinely order radiographs in children presenting with first-time wheezing or typical findings of asthma.[1][137]​ Radiographs in these patients rarely yield positive findings and are associated with increased cost of care, prolonged length of stay in hospital, and overuse of antibiotics.[137]

Result

normal or may show hyperinflation

electron micrograph ciliary studies

Test
Result
Test

May be ordered when primary ciliary dyskinesia is suspected, including Kartagener syndrome (situs inversus with unusually positioned gastric bubble)

Result

normal

chest CT

Test
Result
Test

May show hyperinflation or other causes of pulmonary abnormality or small airways disease that can present with wheeze (e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans). Can distinguish cardiac from pulmonary diseases.

Not recommended routinely, to predict treatment outcomes or lung function, or to assess treatment response.

Result

normal or may show hyperinflation, bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis obliterans, or situs inversus

sinus CT

Test
Result
Test

Can show evidence of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps, which are associated with more severe asthma. The presence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis can also help identify candidates for biologic therapy.

Not recommended routinely.

Result

normal or may show opacification of involved sinuses, mucosal thickening, air-fluid levels, or anatomic abnormalities such as polyps

bronchoscopy

Test
Result
Test

May be done in the case of foreign body aspiration, or when structural abnormalities are suspected (e.g., tracheomalacia or bronchomalacia) that can also present with wheeze.

Result

typically normal

Emerging tests

bronchoalveolar lavage

Test
Result
Test

Bronchoalveolar lavage showing airway eosinophilia or sputum eosinophilia is supportive, but not diagnostic, of asthma.[134][135]

Result

optimal diagnostic cut-offs have not been established for serum and sputum eosinophilia; consult local guidance

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer