It has been estimated that, in the US in 2025, there will be 59,080 new cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed in women.[10]Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, et al. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):10-45.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11745215
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39817679?tool=bestpractice.com
DCIS comprises approximately 85% of in situ carcinomas of the breast, with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) accounting for most of the remainder.[11]Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. (eds.). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008
In the US, DCIS incidence peaks at ages 55-69 years.[12]Ryser MD, Hendrix LH, Worni M, et al. Incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ in the United States, 2000-2014. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Aug;28(8):1316-23.
https://www.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-1262
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31186262?tool=bestpractice.com
DCIS incidence rates are influenced by breast cancer mammography screening uptake.[13]Oseni TO, Zhang B, Coopey SB, et al. Twenty-five year trends in the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ in US women. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jun;228(6):932-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30772444?tool=bestpractice.com
[14]White E, Lee CY, Kristal AR. Evaluation of the increase in breast cancer incidence in relation to mammography use. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Oct 3;82(19):1546-52.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2402016?tool=bestpractice.com
The incidence rate of DCIS in the US and in Europe increased dramatically through the 1990s due to the widespread use of mammography.
Among women attending breast cancer screening in the UK between 1988 and 2014, the overall risk of invasive breast cancer was 8.82 per 1000 women per year, and did not vary significantly with age at diagnosis of DCIS.[2]Mannu GS, Wang Z, Broggio J, et al. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study. BMJ. 2020 May 27;369:m1570.
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1570.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32461218?tool=bestpractice.com
A subsequent UK population-based cohort study (1990-2018) of women with non-screen-detected DCIS found an overall invasive breast cancer rate of 13.28 per 1000 women per year.[3]Mannu GS, Wang Z, Dodwell D, et al. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer death after non-screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ from 1990 to 2018 in England: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Jan 24;384:e075498.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075498.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38267073?tool=bestpractice.com
The following cumulative risks of invasive breast cancer by age at diagnosis were reported: 27.3% for <45 years, 25.2% for 45-49 years, 21.7% for 50-59 years, and 20.8% for 60-70 years.[3]Mannu GS, Wang Z, Dodwell D, et al. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer death after non-screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ from 1990 to 2018 in England: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Jan 24;384:e075498.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075498.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38267073?tool=bestpractice.com
Women diagnosed with non-screen-detected DCIS may present symptomatically (e.g., with interval DCIS between screening mammograms). Incidental diagnosis may be more prevalent among women who are younger at diagnosis, and who may not be eligible for screening.[3]Mannu GS, Wang Z, Dodwell D, et al. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer death after non-screen detected ductal carcinoma in situ from 1990 to 2018 in England: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2024 Jan 24;384:e075498.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075498.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38267073?tool=bestpractice.com
DCIS in men is rare, accounting for approximately 7% of all male breast carcinomas.[15]Camus MG, Joshi MG, Mackarem G, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast. Cancer. 1994 Aug 15;74(4):1289-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8055450?tool=bestpractice.com
The prognosis associated with DCIS in men is excellent.[15]Camus MG, Joshi MG, Mackarem G, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast. Cancer. 1994 Aug 15;74(4):1289-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8055450?tool=bestpractice.com
[16]Nicosia L, Lissidini G, Sargenti M, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast: clinical radiological features and management in a cancer referral center. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Nov;196(2):371-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114939?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of hormone replacement therapy is not associated with DCIS.[17]Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/102/3/170/895415
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071685?tool=bestpractice.com
The lack of association is consistent across five observational studies and one large randomised trial.[17]Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/102/3/170/895415
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071685?tool=bestpractice.com
US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data indicate that LCIS incidence increased from 2 cases per 100,000 in the year 2000 to 2.75 per 100,000 in 2009.[18]Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, et al. Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3240-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846782?tool=bestpractice.com
The increase may potentially be attributable to better screening techniques, more core biopsies being carried out, and improved recognition by pathologists.
US SEER data from 18,835 women diagnosed with LCIS from 1990 to 2015 demonstrated that, compared with white women, black women had a 30% higher risk of developing hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer and an 85% higher risk of developing HR-negative breast cancer.[19]Dania V, Liu Y, Ademuyiwa F, et al. Associations of race and ethnicity with risk of developing invasive breast cancer after lobular carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 14;21(1):120.
https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13058-019-1219-8
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727116?tool=bestpractice.com
Lobular carcinoma, both in situ and invasive, is rare in males, with an incidence of approximately 0.5% to 1.0%.[20]Zygogianni AG, Kyrgias G, Gennatas C, et al. Male breast carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and current therapeutic approaches. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):15-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22502659?tool=bestpractice.com
[21]San Miguel P, Sancho M, Enriquez JL, et al. Lobular carcinoma of the male breast associated with the use of cimetidine. Virchows Arch. 1997 Mar;430(3):261-3.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9099985?tool=bestpractice.com
Breast cancer in situ is principally screen detected. Mammography frequency is, therefore, a significant confounding factor in epidemiological studies.[14]White E, Lee CY, Kristal AR. Evaluation of the increase in breast cancer incidence in relation to mammography use. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990 Oct 3;82(19):1546-52.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2402016?tool=bestpractice.com
[22]Kerlikowske K. Epidemiology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):139-41.
https://academic.oup.com/jncimono/article/2010/41/139/889306?login=false
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20956818?tool=bestpractice.com