Esophageal cancer remains one of the most lethal of all malignancies. Without aggressive treatment, the cancer tends to obstruct the esophagus and cause severe dysphagia. In addition to local progression causing pain, the disease tends to metastasize widely to the lungs, liver, and bone.
Survival depends on stage of disease and treatment; lymph node involvement is an important determinant of survival.[245]Robb WB, Messager M, Dahan L, et al; Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive; Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique; Union des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer; Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie; French EsoGAstric Tumour working group - Fédération de Recherche En Chirurgie. Patterns of recurrence in early-stage oesophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy and surgery compared with surgery alone. Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(1):117-25.
https://academic.oup.com/bjs/article/103/1/117/6136669
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26511668?tool=bestpractice.com
Favorable prognostic factors include early-stage disease and complete resection.
Based upon US data from 2011 to 2017, 5-year relative survival rates for people diagnosed with localized, regional, and distant esophageal cancer are 46.4%, 25.6%, and 5.2%, respectively.[246]National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Esophagus: SEER 5-year relative survival rates, 2012-2018. 2021 [internet publication].
https://seer.cancer.gov/explorer/application.html?site=17&data_type=4&graph_type=5&compareBy=stage&chk_stage_104=104&chk_stage_105=105&chk_stage_106=106&series=9&sex=1&race=1&age_range=1&advopt_precision=1&advopt_show_ci=on&advopt_display=2
Overall 5-year survival rate (all stages of disease) is 22%.[8]American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2024. 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2024/2024-cancer-facts-and-figures-acs.pdf
Five-year survival rates for esophageal adenocarcinoma may be slightly better than those for squamous cell carcinoma (localized stage at diagnosis 51.1% vs. 32.0%; regional 26.5% vs. 24.0%; distant 5.0% vs. 6.1%, respectively). A large pooled analysis found that women treated for esophageal cancer had significantly improved survival versus men.[247]Athauda A, Nankivell M, Langley RE, et al. Impact of sex and age on chemotherapy efficacy, toxicity and survival in localised oesophagogastric cancer: a pooled analysis of 3265 individual patient data from four large randomised trials (OE02, OE05, MAGIC and ST03). Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;137:45-56.
https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(20)30337-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745964?tool=bestpractice.com
Chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicities were also more prevalent in women.[247]Athauda A, Nankivell M, Langley RE, et al. Impact of sex and age on chemotherapy efficacy, toxicity and survival in localised oesophagogastric cancer: a pooled analysis of 3265 individual patient data from four large randomised trials (OE02, OE05, MAGIC and ST03). Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;137:45-56.
https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(20)30337-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745964?tool=bestpractice.com
Randomized studies demonstrate that, compared with standard transthoracic esophagectomy, both minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy and hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy (an Ivor Lewis procedure with laparoscopic gastric mobilization and limited open right thoracotomy) lead to significantly lower rates of postoperative complications and accelerated recovery, without compromising survival benefit.[152]Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22552194?tool=bestpractice.com
[153]Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-62.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1805101
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30625052?tool=bestpractice.com
One systematic review and meta-analysis reported that long-term survival following minimally invasive esophagectomy compares favorably with, and may even be better than, open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.[248]Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, et al. Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1005-17.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30817355?tool=bestpractice.com
Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure with an incidence rate of major complications around 25% to 40%.[249]Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. SSAT patient care guidelines: surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Sep;11(9):1216-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18062075?tool=bestpractice.com
[250]van Kooten RT, Voeten DM, Steyerberg EW, et al. Patient-related prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage, major complications, and short-term mortality following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;29(2):1358-73.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-021-10734-3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482453?tool=bestpractice.com
One systematic review found that male sex and diabetes were prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage and major complications.[250]van Kooten RT, Voeten DM, Steyerberg EW, et al. Patient-related prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage, major complications, and short-term mortality following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;29(2):1358-73.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-021-10734-3
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34482453?tool=bestpractice.com
Data suggest that esophagectomy is most safely performed in high-volume units. The mortality of this procedure in such centers ranges from 2% to 6%. However, serious complications are frequent, and may occur in 20% to 40% of cases.[249]Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. SSAT patient care guidelines: surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Sep;11(9):1216-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18062075?tool=bestpractice.com
The most common complications are pulmonary disorders (10% to 50%), cardiac dysrhythmias (10%), and anastomotic leak (5% to 10%). When the anastomosis is made in the neck, a leak is rarely the cause of serious morbidity. However, dissection in the neck does carry the potential risk of temporary or even permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Average hospital stay following esophagectomy is 10-14 days.[251]Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K, et al. Effects of hospital and surgeon case-volumes on postoperative complications and length of stay after esophagectomy in Japan. Surg Today. 2009;39(7):566-71.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562442?tool=bestpractice.com
[252]Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, et al. Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):177-85.
https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(09)00532-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19559221?tool=bestpractice.com