Inhalation injury
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
all patients
upper airway management + supportive care
An airway should be immediately secured with an endotracheal tube (ETT) if the patient has diminished mental status with poor airway reflexes or history and examination is suggestive of injury with threatened patency.
Patients with inhalation injury often have difficult airways to secure, and preparations for a surgical airway should be made in anticipation of ETT placement failure.
Patients presenting with only inhalation exposure or mild clinical disease should be closely observed and monitored during treatment for evolution or worsening of symptoms, which may be delayed for up to 1 day.[1]Rabinowitz, PM, Siegel MD. Acute inhalational injury. Clin Chest Med. 2002 Dec;23(4):707-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12512160?tool=bestpractice.com High-risk exposures or even subtle worsening of symptoms should be interpreted as poor prognostic signs, and the period of observation and monitoring should be increased.
Critically ill patients with burns and inhalation injury are at high risk for complications; preventative measures, including hand hygiene, head-of-bed elevation, catheter care, and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, are essential.
Comorbid conditions or injuries should be evaluated and treated in a patient with inhalation injury. Therapies for individual conditions are often at odds (such as aggressive volume infusion for cutaneous burns and the conservative fluid approach for acute respiratory distress syndrome), and clinicians must carefully develop a treatment strategy unique to the individual patient.
analgesia + sedation/anxiolytic
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Analgesia is often indicated to relieve the discomfort of an endotracheal tube, tissue oedema, coincident trauma, and cutaneous burns.
Opioid drugs (e.g., morphine, fentanyl) have the additional benefit of relieving dyspnoea.[45]ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee, Advisory Subcommittee, Steering Subcommittee. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care, part 2. Burns. 2018 Nov;44(7):1617-706. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.012 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30343831?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients not ventilated through an endotracheal tube should be monitored closely, as respiratory suppression can occur.
Continuous intravenous morphine or fentanyl provide excellent analgesia for invasive mechanical ventilation.
Sedation and anxiolysis are also indicated for patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Propofol and dexmedetomidine are commonly used agents. In March 2022, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a warning about an increased risk of mortality with dexmedetomidine treatment in critically ill patients aged ≤65 years compared with alternative sedatives. This recommendation follows results from an open-label, randomised trial, comparing dexmedetomidine with usual care (propofol, midazolam, or other sedatives) in critically ill adult patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. The study showed no difference in overall 90-day mortality between treatments. However, dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients ≤65 years old, compared with alternative sedatives.[46]Shehabi Y, Howe BD, Bellomo R, et al. Early sedation with dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2506-17. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1904710 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112380?tool=bestpractice.com The EMA advises clinicians to weigh these findings against the expected clinical benefit of dexmedetomidine in this age group.[47]European Medicines Agency. Meeting highlights from the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) 7-10 March 2022. March 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/meeting-highlights-pharmacovigilance-risk-assessment-committee-prac-7-10-march-2022
Primary options
morphine sulfate: 2-10 mg/hour intravenous infusion
or
fentanyl: 12.5 to 200 micrograms/hour intravenous infusion
-- AND / OR --
propofol: see local protocol for guidance on dose
or
dexmedetomidine injection: see local protocol for guidance on dose
high-flow supplemental oxygen therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning should be treated to prevent the associated persistent and delayed neurological sequelae.[28]Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 19;360(12):1217-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19297574?tool=bestpractice.com
All patients should receive high-flow supplemental oxygen to decrease hypoxia and facilitate removal of CO. Current guidelines recommend using high flow oxygen therapy for at least 6 hours, or longer if symptoms persist.[27]ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee, Steering Subcommittee, Advisory Subcommittee. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care. Burns. 2016 Aug;42(5):953-1021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417916301449?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542292?tool=bestpractice.com
hyperbaric oxygen
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
The use of hyperbaric oxygen has been considered controversial by some.[28]Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 19;360(12):1217-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19297574?tool=bestpractice.com [29]Buckley NA, Juurlink DN, Isbister G, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;(4):CD002041. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002041.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21491385?tool=bestpractice.com While some have recommended its use for pregnant patients or patients with severe disease (coma, seizure, cardiovascular disease, acidosis), the data specific to certain subgroups are unclear.[28]Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 19;360(12):1217-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19297574?tool=bestpractice.com One clinical trial found evidence to suggest that hyperbaric oxygen reduces cognitive sequelae both acutely and at 12 months.[35]Kallet RH, Branson RD. Should oxygen therapy be tightly regulated to minimize hyperoxia in critically ill patients? Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):801-17. http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/61/6/801.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27235315?tool=bestpractice.com
One retrospective study found that (after adjusting for age, sex, and underlying comorbidities) patients with carbon monoxide poisoning who were treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy had a lower mortality rate compared with patients who did not receive hyperbaric oxygen.[31]Huang CC, Ho CH, Chen YC, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is associated with lower short- and long-term mortality in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. Chest. 2017 Apr 17 [Epub ahead of print]. http://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(17)30723-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427969?tool=bestpractice.com The reduction in mortality risk was greatest among patients aged younger than 20 years and those with acute respiratory failure.[31]Huang CC, Ho CH, Chen YC, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is associated with lower short- and long-term mortality in patients with carbon monoxide poisoning. Chest. 2017 Apr 17 [Epub ahead of print]. http://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(17)30723-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28427969?tool=bestpractice.com Because of this data, a 2023 Delphi panel deemed hyperbaric oxygen therapy to be of uncertain benefit in patients for whom a hyperbaric chamber is available onsite.[32]Milton-Jones H, Soussi S, Davies R, et al. An international RAND/UCLA expert panel to determine the optimal diagnosis and management of burn inhalation injury. Crit Care. 2023 Nov 27;27(1):459. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-023-04718-w http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012797?tool=bestpractice.com This panel recommended against hyperbaric oxygen if it required transfer away from a burn centre.
hydroxocobalamin ± sodium thiosulfate
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
While cyanide toxicity is often cited, its true role in inhalation injury is unclear and its treatment is controversial.[21]Barillo DJ. Diagnosis and treatment of cyanide toxicity. J Burn Care Res. 2009 Jan-Feb;30(1):148-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19060738?tool=bestpractice.com
If cyanide toxicity is suspected in a patient with inhalation injury, the recommended therapy is the direct cyanide binder hydroxocobalamin with or without sodium thiosulfate.[27]ISBI Practice Guidelines Committee, Steering Subcommittee, Advisory Subcommittee. ISBI practice guidelines for burn care. Burns. 2016 Aug;42(5):953-1021. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417916301449?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27542292?tool=bestpractice.com [32]Milton-Jones H, Soussi S, Davies R, et al. An international RAND/UCLA expert panel to determine the optimal diagnosis and management of burn inhalation injury. Crit Care. 2023 Nov 27;27(1):459. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-023-04718-w http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012797?tool=bestpractice.com [33]Anseeuw K, Delvau N, Burillo-Putze G, et al. Cyanide poisoning by fire smoke inhalation: a European expert consensus. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(1):2-9. https://journals.lww.com/euro-emergencymed/fulltext/2013/02000/cyanide_poisoning_by_fire_smoke_inhalation__a.2.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828651?tool=bestpractice.com
Recommendations regarding the use of sodium thiosulfate as an adjunctive treatment for cyanide toxicity vary across guidelines. A 2013 European expert consensus recommends hydroxocobalamin as the first-line treatment, with sodium thiosulfate as a second-line option.[33]Anseeuw K, Delvau N, Burillo-Putze G, et al. Cyanide poisoning by fire smoke inhalation: a European expert consensus. Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(1):2-9. https://journals.lww.com/euro-emergencymed/fulltext/2013/02000/cyanide_poisoning_by_fire_smoke_inhalation__a.2.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828651?tool=bestpractice.com In contrast, a 2023 international Delphi panel deemed sodium thiosulfate therapy to be of uncertain benefit.[32]Milton-Jones H, Soussi S, Davies R, et al. An international RAND/UCLA expert panel to determine the optimal diagnosis and management of burn inhalation injury. Crit Care. 2023 Nov 27;27(1):459. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-023-04718-w http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38012797?tool=bestpractice.com Blood cyanide levels of higher than 2.6 to 3.0 mg/L are considered fatal.[34]Yeoh MJ, Braitberg G. Carbon monoxide and cyanide poisoning in fire related deaths in Victoria, Australia. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(6):855-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15533025?tool=bestpractice.com
The commonly available 'antidote kit' of sodium nitrite and sodium thiosulfate (known as Nithiodote® in the US) should be used very cautiously because nitrates induce methaemoglobin (which binds systemic cyanide). Methaemoglobin, in the presence of significant carboxyhaemoglobin, contributes to critically lowering oxygen delivering capacity. Nitrates are, therefore, contraindicated in the presence of significant carboxyhaemoglobinaemia.
Primary options
hydroxocobalamin: 5 g intravenously as a single dose, may repeat once if needed
More hydroxocobalaminDoses up to 20 g have been used.
OR
hydroxocobalamin: 5 g intravenously as a single dose, may repeat once if needed
More hydroxocobalaminDoses up to 20 g have been used.
and
sodium thiosulfate: 12.5 g intravenously as a single dose, may repeat once if needed at half the dose
Secondary options
sodium nitrite: consult specialist for guidance on dose
and
sodium thiosulfate: consult specialist for guidance on dose
inhaled beta-agonist
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Airway cellular injury leading to oedema, sloughing, and bronchoconstriction causes obstruction in patients with inhalation injury. This lower airway injury is treated largely with supportive care. Care should be taken to avoid toxic levels of inhaled oxygen (hyperoxaemia) following effective treatment of possible carbon monoxide poisoning.[35]Kallet RH, Branson RD. Should oxygen therapy be tightly regulated to minimize hyperoxia in critically ill patients? Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):801-17. http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/61/6/801.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27235315?tool=bestpractice.com
Inhaled beta-agonists (e.g., nebulised salbutamol [albuterol]) should be used as needed for bronchoconstriction, and evidence suggests that they may also benefit the patient via anti-inflammatory properties.[36]Palmieri TL. Use of beta-agonists in inhalation injury. J Burn Care Res. 2009 Jan-Feb;30(1):156-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19060734?tool=bestpractice.com
Airway clearance should be facilitated by humidification of delivered oxygen and aggressive pulmonary toilet.
Primary options
salbutamol inhaled: 2.5 mg nebulised every 4-6 hours when required
positive pressure ventilation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Airway cellular injury leading to oedema, sloughing, and bronchoconstriction causes obstruction in patients with inhalation injury. This lower airway injury is treated largely with supportive care.
Patients should be clinically monitored for evidence of respiratory muscle fatigue and ventilatory failure. While high levels of inhaled oxygen (hyperoxaemia) may be used therapeutically for carbon monoxide poisoning, once excluded or resolved hyperoxaemia is no longer recommended, and the patient may be supported with a standard fraction of inspired oxygen sufficient to maintain adequate haemoglobin saturation.[35]Kallet RH, Branson RD. Should oxygen therapy be tightly regulated to minimize hyperoxia in critically ill patients? Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):801-17. http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/61/6/801.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27235315?tool=bestpractice.com
oxygen therapy + positive pressure ventilation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Patients with lung parenchymal injury (which may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS]) should be treated supportively with oxygen and positive pressure ventilation as the clinical situation warrants.
It is reasonable to utilise volume-cycled ventilation with low tidal volume ventilation (4-6 cc/kg of ideal body weight) and avoidance of high plateau pressures (>30 cm H₂O), which has proved beneficial in non-selected ARDS.[40]The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200005043421801#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10793162?tool=bestpractice.com Alternatively, pressure-cycled ventilation may be used to achieve similar physiological goals. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation was associated with accelerated improvements in pulmonary function in one small randomised controlled trial.[41]Allam NM, Badawy MM. Does high-frequency chest wall oscillation have an impact on improving pulmonary function in patients with smoke inhalation injury? J Burn Care Res. 2021 Mar 4;42(2):300-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860696?tool=bestpractice.com
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Similar to other cases of severe refractory respiratory failure, ECMO may be considered in inhalation injury patients whose condition is refractory to maximal measures. One 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 retrospective studies including 318 patients on ECMO in the setting of inhalation injury found a pooled percentage of successful decannulation of 65%, but with an ECMO complication prevalence of 67%.[48]Heng X, Cai P, Yuan Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for burn patients: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns Trauma. 2023;11:tkac056. https://academic.oup.com/burnstrauma/article/doi/10.1093/burnst/tkac056/7066360 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36873286?tool=bestpractice.com Bleeding and infection were the most common complications.
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer