There are no human vaccines against Brucella species. Therefore, the mainstay of disease prevention is to avoid or control animal infection, thereby reducing the risk of human infection. Animal vaccination is considered the most effective method to achieve this goal.[15]Godfroid J, Cloeckaert A, Liautard JP, et al. From the discovery of the Malta fever's agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res. 2005 May-Jun;36(3):313-26.
http://www.vetres.org/articles/vetres/pdf/2005/03/v4056.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15845228?tool=bestpractice.com
[16]Zinsstag J, Schelling S, Wyss K, et al. Potential of cooperation between human and animal health to strengthen health systems. Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2142-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16360795?tool=bestpractice.com
The vaccines currently available are highly immunogenic and can protect the animal for many years. In addition, the testing and slaughtering of infected animals removes them and their contaminated products from the food chain, thereby reducing the risk of human infection.[1]Madkour MM. Madkour's brucellosis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2001.[77]World Health Organization. Brucellosis in humans and animals. 2006 [internet publication].
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547130
[78]Luzzi GA, Brindle R, Sockett PN, et al. Brucellosis: imported and laboratory-acquired cases, and an overview of treatment trials. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993 Mar-Apr;87(2):138-41.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8337710?tool=bestpractice.com
Pasteurisation of milk is also highly effective in preventing human transmission.[1]Madkour MM. Madkour's brucellosis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2001.[49]Langer AJ, Ayers T, Grass J, et al. Nonpasteurized dairy products, disease outbreaks, and state laws - United States, 1993-2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;18(3):385-91.
http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/3/11-1370_article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22377202?tool=bestpractice.com
[50]Claeys WL, Cardoen S, Daube G, et al. Raw or heated cow milk consumption: review of risks and benefits. Food Control. 2013;31:251-62.[77]World Health Organization. Brucellosis in humans and animals. 2006 [internet publication].
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547130
In endemic areas, the population should be educated to pasteurise all milk products and not to eat potentially infected raw meat products or animal viscera.[15]Godfroid J, Cloeckaert A, Liautard JP, et al. From the discovery of the Malta fever's agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res. 2005 May-Jun;36(3):313-26.
http://www.vetres.org/articles/vetres/pdf/2005/03/v4056.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15845228?tool=bestpractice.com
People who consume raw milk (or raw milk products) that are potentially contaminated with the RB51 strain (the B abortus strain used in animal vaccines) are at high risk for infection.
Owing to the infectious nature of this pathogen, post-exposure prophylaxis is usually recommended after laboratory accidents or major aerosol exposure, as outbreaks of this disease can be economically devastating. The evidence for post-exposure prophylaxis is at present limited.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend symptom monitoring (at least weekly for 24 weeks after exposure), serological monitoring (at 0, 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks after exposure), and post-exposure antimicrobial prophylaxis for people with high-risk exposures.[63]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Brucellosis reference guide: exposures, testing and prevention. Feb 2017 [internet publication].
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/46133
A 21-day course of doxycycline plus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is recommended for the RB51 strain, provided there are no contraindications. Antibiotic prophylaxis for species other than the RB51 strain is usually a combination of doxycycline and rifampin.[63]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Brucellosis reference guide: exposures, testing and prevention. Feb 2017 [internet publication].
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/46133
Post-exposure prophylaxis should be started as soon as possible, but can be initiated up to 24 weeks after exposure. Post-exposure prophylaxis is not typically recommended for low-risk exposures.[63]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Brucellosis reference guide: exposures, testing and prevention. Feb 2017 [internet publication].
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/46133
International guidelines may recommend different antimicrobial regimens for post-exposure prophylaxis, and some guidelines may recommend monotherapy due to the adverse effects associated with combination antimicrobial therapy.
For example, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) recommends monotherapy with doxycycline or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for 21 days in adults at high risk after a possible laboratory exposure, within 72 hours of exposure. Alternatives for pregnant women include rifampicin (with or without trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) or ciprofloxacin, or observation only.[79]UK Health Security Agency. Brucella: laboratory and clinical services. May 2025 [internet publication].
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/bru-reference-services
All microbiology personnel should be aware of the risk of brucellosis, even in non-endemic regions, and should be discouraged from risky procedures such as sniffing culture plates and handling or vortexing known or possible Brucella cultures in the open laboratory.[33]Yagupsky P, Baron EJ. Laboratory exposures to brucellae and implications for bioterrorism. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;11(8):1180-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16102304?tool=bestpractice.com
[80]Robichaud S, Libman M, Behr M, et al. Prevention of laboratory-acquired brucellosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;38(12):e119-22.
http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/12/e119.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15227634?tool=bestpractice.com
Isolates of unidentified gram-negative or gram-variable coccobacilli and bacilli should be handled in appropriate biosafety cabinets in the laboratory.[33]Yagupsky P, Baron EJ. Laboratory exposures to brucellae and implications for bioterrorism. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;11(8):1180-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16102304?tool=bestpractice.com
[35]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Laboratory-acquired brucellosis - Indiana and Minnesota, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008 Jan 18;57(2):39-42.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5702a3.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18199967?tool=bestpractice.com
[36]Reddy S, Manuel R, Sheridan E, et al. Brucellosis in the United Kingdom - a risk to laboratory workers? Recommendations for prevention and management of laboratory exposure. J Clin Pathol. 2010 Jan;63(1):90-2.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18495792?tool=bestpractice.com
[37]Knudsen A, Kronborg G, Dahl Knudsen J, et al. Laboratory exposure to Brucella melitensis in Denmark: a prospective study. J Hosp Infect. 2013 Nov;85(3):237-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24070633?tool=bestpractice.com
[38]Traxler RM, Lehman MW, Bosserman EA, et al. A literature review of laboratory-acquired brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Sep;51(9):3055-62.
http://jcm.asm.org/content/51/9/3055.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23824774?tool=bestpractice.com
Hunters of feral animals, such as wild pigs, should take precautions to avoid contaminating themselves with infected material while butchering or handling the dead animals.[63]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Brucellosis reference guide: exposures, testing and prevention. Feb 2017 [internet publication].
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/46133