Cancer vaccines plus immunotherapy
IO102-IO103, an investigational immune-modulatory therapeutic cancer vaccine designed to target both tumour cells and immune-suppressive cells within the tumour microenvironment by stimulating activation and expansion of T cells against IDO1+ and/or programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive cells, is being tested to treat patients with advanced melanoma. One open-label, randomised phase 3 trial with treatment-naive advanced melanoma patients compared IO102-IO103 in combination with pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab alone. The initial results, which were presented in a conference abstract, demonstrated that combination treatment improved progression-free survival compared with pembrolizumab alone.
ESMO: IO102–IO103 cancer vaccine plus pembrolizumab for first-line (1L) advanced melanoma: primary phase III results (IOB-013/KN-D18)
Opens in new window One ongoing single arm phase 2 trial is testing nivolumab plus ipilimumab in combination with the DNA-based melanoma vaccines SCIB1and iSCIB1+, or SCIB1 in combination with pembrolizumab, for untreated patients with unresectable stage III/IV melanoma.[179]ClinicalTrials.gov. SCIB1 and iSCIB1+ in melanoma patients receiving nivolumab with ipilimumab or SCIB1 with pembrolizumab (the SCOPE study). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04079166. Dec 2025 [internet publication].
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04079166
Initial results reported in a conference abstract stated that 23 patients have received the combination of SCIB1 with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and that for the 13 patients that have reached the first imaging timepoint of 13 weeks, the objective response rate is 11/13 (85%), response rates were confirmed in a subsequent scan (one complete response and 10 partial responses); the disease control rate was 12/13 (92%) and 1 partial disease control. Patients showed a 40% to 100% reduction in tumour volume at 13 and/or 25 weeks.[180]SM Heather, PM Poulam, P Miranda, et al. A DNA plasmid melanoma cancer vaccine, SCIB1, combined with nivolumab + ipilimumab in patients with advanced unresectable melanoma: efficacy and safety results from the open-label phase 2 SCOPE trial. J Clin Oncol 2024;42(Suppl 16):9535.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.9535
Adjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy for advanced resectable disease
Phase 2/3 trials have demonstrated that adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab significantly improved survival in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease compared with placebo, but no significant difference was found between combination treatment compared with nivolumab alone for patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma.[181]Livingstone E, Zimmer L, Hassel JC, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): final results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2022 Oct 1;400(10358):1117-29.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01654-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36099927?tool=bestpractice.com
[182]Weber JS, Schadendorf D, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 915). J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):517-27.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00533?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037?tool=bestpractice.com
However, while there has been no demonstrable benefit of adjuvant treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nivolumab alone in resected stage 3 disease, there are some data to suggest benefit in the resected stage 4 setting.[181]Livingstone E, Zimmer L, Hassel JC, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): final results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2022 Oct 1;400(10358):1117-29.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01654-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36099927?tool=bestpractice.com
[182]Weber JS, Schadendorf D, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 915). J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):517-27.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00533?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group at lower doses, but when higher doses were used in the trial stage 2 and 4 adverse effects increased to 71%, and 29% of patients, respectively.[181]Livingstone E, Zimmer L, Hassel JC, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus placebo in patients with resected stage IV melanoma with no evidence of disease (IMMUNED): final results of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2022 Oct 1;400(10358):1117-29.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)01654-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36099927?tool=bestpractice.com
[182]Weber JS, Schadendorf D, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant therapy of nivolumab combined with ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 915). J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 20;41(3):517-27.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00533?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36162037?tool=bestpractice.com
Binimetinib for NRAS-mutant melanoma
The NEMO trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the mitogen-activated extracellular kinase (MEK) inhibitor binimetinib versus that of dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma and found that binimetinib improved progression-free survival compared with dacarbazine and was tolerable.[183]Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Ascierto PA, et al. Binimetinib versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced NRAS-mutant melanoma (NEMO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):435-45.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28284557?tool=bestpractice.com
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend binimetinib as useful in certain circumstances for patients with NRAS-mutated tumours who experience progression following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.[13]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: melanoma - cutaneous [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Targeted therapy against KIT-mutant melanoma
Mutations in KIT oncogene are characteristic for acral and mucous melanoma subtypes. The therapeutic value of KIT inhibitors (imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, and sunitinib) has been evaluated in a systematic review and one-arm meta-analysis.[184]Steeb T, Wessely A, Petzold A, et al. c-Kit inhibitors for unresectable or metastatic mucosal, acral or chronically sun-damaged melanoma: a systematic review and one-arm meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:348-57.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562816?tool=bestpractice.com
The pooled objective response rate (ORR) of KIT inhibitors for unresectable or metastatic mucosal, acral, or chronically sun-damaged melanoma was 15%. Subgroup analysis revealed the highest ORR for nilotinib (20%).[184]Steeb T, Wessely A, Petzold A, et al. c-Kit inhibitors for unresectable or metastatic mucosal, acral or chronically sun-damaged melanoma: a systematic review and one-arm meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2021 Nov;157:348-57.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562816?tool=bestpractice.com
In a single-arm phase 2 trial of patients with KIT-mutated metastatic or inoperable melanoma, 10 of the 11 patients who responded to nilotinib had mutations in exon 11 of the KIT gene, suggesting that nilotinib may be an effective treatment for patients with specific KIT mutations.[185]Guo J, Carvajal RD, Dummer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of nilotinib in patients with KIT-mutated metastatic or inoperable melanoma: final results from the global, single-arm, phase II TEAM trial. Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1380-7.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)32423-8/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28327988?tool=bestpractice.com
Targeted and immunotherapy combinations
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved combination therapy with the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab in combination with cobimetinib (a MEK inhibitor) and vemurafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) for patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. In a randomised controlled phase 3 trial, the combination of atezolizumab, cobimetinib, and vemurafenib was associated with longer median progression-free survival, and increased toxicity, in patients with unresectable or metastatic disease, compared with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib.[186]Gutzmer R, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma (IMspire150): primary analysis of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Jun 13;395(10240):1835-44.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32534646?tool=bestpractice.com
However, follow-up data reported that the triplet regimen did not significantly improve overall survival compared with placebo.[187]Ascierto PA, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Overall survival with first-line atezolizumab in combination with vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAF(V600) mutation-positive advanced melanoma (IMspire150): second interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jan;24(1):33-44.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460017?tool=bestpractice.com
The NCCN guidelines recommend pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) as a potential treatment for patients with BRAF V600 mutation melanoma who have progressed on systemic immunotherapy, or who have progressed following treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitor if not previously received.[13]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: melanoma - cutaneous [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
This combination is also recommended as a potential treatment for patients without BRAF V600 mutation who have progressed on anti-PD-1 monotherapy if not already received.[13]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: melanoma - cutaneous [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Novel molecular and immune targets
The interleukin-2 pathway agonist bempegaldesleukin is under investigation in phase 3 trials, in combination with nivolumab.[188]Diab A, Gogas H, Sandhu S, et al. Bempegaldesleukin plus nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma: the open-label, phase III PIVOT IO 001 trial results. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 20;41(30):4756-67.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.00172
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37651676?tool=bestpractice.com
Bempegaldesleukin preferentially activates CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, which destroy cancer cells. Other immune cell receptor checkpoints are also under study, including LAG3 and GITR. The US FDA has granted fast track designation to alrizomadlin, which targets the p53 pathway. Alrizomadlin binds to, and inactivates, MDM2. In healthy cells, MDM2 binds to and inactivates p53. By blocking this process, alrizomadlin induces the p53 tumour suppression pathway. A phase 2 clinical trial of alrizomadlin plus pembrolizumab for refractory/relapsed melanoma is underway.[189]ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of APG-115 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanomas or advanced solid tumors. Feb 2023 [internet publication].
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03611868
Lifileucel
The FDA has granted accelerated approval to lifileucel, a tumour infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who have progressed on or after anti-PD-1 therapy, and if BRAF V600 positive, a BRAF inhibitor with or without a MEK inhibitor. Phase 2 trials have demonstrated that lifileucel improved tumour response for patients with advanced melanoma who have been heavily pre-treated; one trial reported participants had received at least three prior therapies including PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.[190]Chesney J, Lewis KD, Kluger H, et al. Efficacy and safety of lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, in patients with advanced melanoma after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies: pooled analysis of consecutive cohorts of the C-144-01 study. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Dec;10(12):e005755.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600653?tool=bestpractice.com
[191]Sarnaik AA, Hamid O, Khushalani NI, et al. Lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 20;39(24):2656-66.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.21.00612?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33979178?tool=bestpractice.com
The 5 year analysis of the C-144 -01 study assessed the long- term efficacy and safety of lifileucel.[190]Chesney J, Lewis KD, Kluger H, et al. Efficacy and safety of lifileucel, a one-time autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, in patients with advanced melanoma after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies: pooled analysis of consecutive cohorts of the C-144-01 study. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Dec;10(12):e005755.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36600653?tool=bestpractice.com
[192]Medina T, Chesney JA, Kluger HM, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of lifileucel tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy in patients with advanced melanoma: a 5-year analysis of the C-144-01 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Nov 20;43(33):3565-72.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO-25-00765
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40454684?tool=bestpractice.com
The results demonstrated a 31.4% objective response in pretreated patients with no additional long-term safety concerns.[192]Medina T, Chesney JA, Kluger HM, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of lifileucel tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy in patients with advanced melanoma: a 5-year analysis of the C-144-01 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Nov 20;43(33):3565-72.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO-25-00765
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40454684?tool=bestpractice.com
Vusolimogene oderparepvec
Vusolimogene oderparepvec is a modified herpes virus which selectively infects and lyses tumour cells.[193]National Cancer Institute. Vusolimogene oderparepvec [internet publication].
https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-drug/def/vusolimogene-oderparepvec
Early results from phase 1 and 2 trials suggest that nivolumab plus vusolimogene oderparepvec is safe and effective in patients with advanced melanoma who have not responded to anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy.[194]ClinicalTrials.gov. Study of RP1 monotherapy and RP1 in combination with nivolumab (IGNYTE). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03767348. Jan 2025 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03767348
A phase 3 trial is in progress.[195]ClinicalTrials.gov. VO and nivolumab vs physician's choice in advanced melanoma that progressed on anti-PD-1 & anti-CTLA-4 drugs (IGNYTE-3). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06264180. Dec 2024 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06264180
The FDA is currently reviewing the treatment for approval.
T-cell receptor therapies
T-cell receptor therapies equip activated T cells with specific receptors that target their complementary cancer antigens. One systematic review demonstrated that for patients with cutaneous melanoma, T-cell receptor therapy improves antitumour activity and survival rates similar to those reported for tumour-inflitrating lymphocyte therapy with a significantly higher benefit for cancer/testis antigens targeting cells.[196]Yarza R, Bover M, Herrera-Juarez M, et al. Efficacy of T-cell receptor-based adoptive cell therapy in cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Oncologist. 2023 Jun 2;28(6):e406-15.
https://academic.oup.com/oncolo/article/28/6/e406/7111821?login=false
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37036865?tool=bestpractice.com
The interim data from a first-in-human, multicentre, open-label, 3 + 3 dose-escalation/de-escalation phase 1 trial studying IMA203, an autologous preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) directed TCR T cell therapy, in HLA-A*02+ patients with PRAME, recurrent and/or refractory melanoma showed promising anti-tumour activity in multiple solid tumours, including refractory melanoma.[197]Wermke M, Araujo DM, Chatterjee M, et al. Autologous T cell therapy for PRAME(+) advanced solid tumors in HLA-A*02(+) patients: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 2025 Jul;31(7):2365-74.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12283372
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40205198?tool=bestpractice.com