Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
nonpregnant
basal-bolus insulin
Intensive insulin replacement should be started as soon as possible after diagnosis to maintain blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible. This prevents diabetic ketoacidosis and reduces the likelihood of chronic complications.[91]Fullerton B, Jeitler K, Seitz M, et al. Intensive glucose control versus conventional glucose control for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;(2):CD009122. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009122.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24526393?tool=bestpractice.com [92]Lachin JM, Bebu I, Nathan DM, et al. The beneficial effects of earlier versus later implementation of intensive therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug 11;44(10):2225-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34380706?tool=bestpractice.com
Setting a glycemic goal during consultations improves patient outcomes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends a target hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goal of <7% (<53 mmol/mol) for most nonpregnant adults, adolescents, and children, provided they do not have significant or frequent hypoglycemia.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 If using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device, a parallel goal is >70% time in range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]) with time below range (<70 mg/dL [<3.9 mmol/L]) <4% and time <54 mg/dL (<3 mmol/L) <1%.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [89]Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6973648 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31177185?tool=bestpractice.com The International Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes recommends that for preschoolers with type 1 diabetes, an alternative target of >50% of time in a tighter range (TITR; 70-140 mg/dL [3.9-7.8 mmol/L]) can be used.[90]Sundberg F, deBeaufort C, Krogvold L, et al. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2022: managing diabetes in preschoolers. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1496-511. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10108244 Less stringent goals (e.g., <7.5% to 8.0% [58-64 mmol/mol]) may be appropriate for very young children (who are often unable to recognize, articulate, and/or manage hypoglycemia), some older adults, people with a history of severe or frequent hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness, and those with advanced microvascular or macrovascular complications or comorbid conditions (or in other instances where the harms of stringent treatment outweigh the benefits).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 For older adults with very poor or complex health, an approach focused on avoidance of hypoglycemia and symptomatic hyperglycemia may be more appropriate than relying on a glycemic goal approach.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Conversely, some patients may have more stringent HbA1c goals (e.g., <6.5% [<48 mmol/mol]), where this can be achieved safely and without undue care burden, and if the clinician (in agreement with the patient) feels this is appropriate and could be beneficial.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
The choice between continuous infusion with an insulin pump and a regimen of multiple daily injections (MDI) is based on patient interest and self-management skills, cost, and physician preference.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
[93]Misso ML, Egberts KJ, Page M, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD005103.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005103.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091571?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
In people with type 1 diabetes mellitus, how does continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compare with multiple insulin injections at improving outcomes?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.19/fullShow me the answer The insulin pump uses a subcutaneous insulin injection port which is changed every 2-3 days. Using rapid-acting insulin, it provides a basal rate of insulin and delivers mealtime bolus dosing. It can be used with a CGM system (referred to as sensor-augmented pump therapy), allowing users to see their blood glucose levels in real-time and make insulin adjustments accordingly. The sensor-augmented pump requires manual input from the user for insulin boluses and basal rates. Insulin pump therapy is associated with improved glycemic control and lower risk of hypoglycemia, including in children, adolescents, and young adults.[106]Monami M, Lamanna C, Marchionni N, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2010 Dec;47(1 suppl):77-81.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19504039?tool=bestpractice.com
[107]Li XL. Multiple daily injections versus insulin pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta analysis. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2010;14(46):8722-5.[108]Cummins E, Royle P, Snaith A, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(11):iii-iv;xi-xvi;1-181.
https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta14110#/full-report
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20223123?tool=bestpractice.com
[109]Benkhadra K, Alahdab F, Tamhane SU, et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2016 Aug 1;55(1):77-84.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27477293?tool=bestpractice.com
However, the management burden of diabetes does not decrease as frequent user input is necessary.[70]Subramanian S, Khan F, Hirsch IB. New advances in type 1 diabetes. BMJ. 2024 Jan 26;384:e075681.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075681.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38278529?tool=bestpractice.com
Thus emerged the concept of glucose responsive automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, in which data from CGM can inform and allow adjustment of insulin delivery, including adjusting insulin rates for both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.[70]Subramanian S, Khan F, Hirsch IB. New advances in type 1 diabetes. BMJ. 2024 Jan 26;384:e075681.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075681.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38278529?tool=bestpractice.com
AID systems (also called closed-loop or artificial pancreas systems) include three components - an insulin pump that continuously delivers rapid-acting insulin, a continuous glucose sensor that measures interstitial fluid glucose at frequent intervals, and a control algorithm that continuously adjusts insulin delivery (this computerized algorithm resides in the insulin pump or a smartphone application or handheld device).[70]Subramanian S, Khan F, Hirsch IB. New advances in type 1 diabetes. BMJ. 2024 Jan 26;384:e075681.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075681.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38278529?tool=bestpractice.com
All AID systems that are available today are referred to as “hybrid” closed-loop systems, as users are required to manually enter prandial insulin boluses and signal exercise, but insulin delivery is automated at nighttime and between meals.[70]Subramanian S, Khan F, Hirsch IB. New advances in type 1 diabetes. BMJ. 2024 Jan 26;384:e075681.
https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075681.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38278529?tool=bestpractice.com
User input is variable depending on the device. In both children and adults, AID systems have been found to be superior to insulin pump therapy, sensor-augmented pumps, and MDI in terms of time in target glucose range, hypoglycemia (including nocturnal hypoglycemia), and HbA1c levels.[110]Weisman A, Bai JW, Cardinez M, et al. Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 May 19;5(7):501-12.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533136?tool=bestpractice.com
[111]Phillip M, Battelino T, Atlas E, et al. Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):824-33.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1206881#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23445093?tool=bestpractice.com
[112]Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, et al. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):311-20.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1002853
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587585?tool=bestpractice.com
[113]Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, et al. Six-month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1707-17.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1907863
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618560?tool=bestpractice.com
[114]Michou P, Gkiourtzis N, Christoforidis A, et al. The efficacy of automated insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 May;199:110678.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094750?tool=bestpractice.com
[115]Jabari M. Efficacy and safety of closed-loop control system for type one diabetes in adolescents a meta analysis. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 13;13(1):13165.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10423718
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37574494?tool=bestpractice.com
[116]Jiao X, Shen Y, Chen Y. Better TIR, HbA1c, and less hypoglycemia in closed-loop insulin system in patients with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Apr;10(2):e002633.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9024214
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35450868?tool=bestpractice.com
[117]Mameli C, Smylie GM, Galati A, et al. Safety, metabolic and psychological outcomes of medtronic MiniMed 670G in children, adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):1949-63.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942055
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36809498?tool=bestpractice.com
[118]Zeng B, Gao L, Yang Q, et al. Automated insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2023 Dec 1;46(12):2300-7.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10698220
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38011519?tool=bestpractice.com
[119]Renard E, Joubert M, Villard O, et al. Safety and efficacy of sustained automated insulin delivery compared with sensor and pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2023 Dec 1;46(12):2180-7.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10698222
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37729080?tool=bestpractice.com
[120]Asgharzadeh A, Patel M, Connock M, et al. Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(80):1-190.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11664472
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39673446?tool=bestpractice.com
As a result, both pediatric and adult guidelines recommend that AID systems should be offered to all patients with type 1 diabetes to improve glycemic control, providing they (or their caregivers) are able to use them safely.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
[48]International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2024. Dec 2024 [nternet publication].
https://www.ispad.org/resources/ispad-clinical-practice-consensus-guidelines/2024-clinical-practice-consensus-guidelines.html
[124]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
In general, individuals with type 1 diabetes require approximately 30% to 50% of their daily insulin as basal and the remainder as prandial (which is divided and given as boluses before meals). This proportion depends on several factors, including carbohydrate consumption, age, pregnancy status, and puberty stage.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Total daily dose requirements can be estimated based on weight, with typical doses ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 units/kg/day.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A starting dose of 0.5 units/kg/day is usually appropriate for metabolically stable adults.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Higher doses are required during pregnancy, puberty, and illness.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
The ADA recommends that for most adults with type 1 diabetes, insulin analogs (or inhaled insulin) are preferred over injectable human insulins for both basal and prandial dosing to minimize hypoglycemia risk.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
They may also provide the benefit of increased flexibility of lifestyle and less weight gain compared with human insulins.[94]Tricco AC, Ashoor HM, Antony J, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of long acting versus intermediate acting insulin for patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014 Oct 1;349:g5459.
https://www.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5459
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25274009?tool=bestpractice.com
However, they are more expensive.[96]Laranjeira FO, de Andrade KR, Figueiredo AC, et al. Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0194801.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194801
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29649221?tool=bestpractice.com
[97]Fullerton B, Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K, et al. Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD012161.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012161/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27362975?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How do short-acting insulin analogs compare with regular human insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.1466/fullShow me the answer Biosimilars of analog insulin may be available in some countries at a lower cost, making them more affordable.
Blood glucose monitoring (BGM; previously known as self-monitoring of blood glucose) and/or CGM allow patients and physicians to evaluate response to therapy, and to assess whether glycemic targets are being safely achieved.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Insulin doses can be adjusted every 2-3 days to maintain target blood glucose. To achieve an HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol), the pre-meal blood glucose goal should be 80-130 mg/dL (4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L) and the post-meal blood glucose goal (1-2 hours after starting the meal) should be <180 mg/dL (<10.0 mmol/L).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
The ADA recommends simplifying complex treatment plans (especially insulin) in older people to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, polypharmacy, and treatment burden, if this can be achieved within the individualized HbA1c target.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 In older adults, overtreatment of diabetes is common, and steps should be taken to avoid and recognize this.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Basal insulin: can be administered as a basal rate of rapid-acting insulin via an insulin pump, or as daily or twice daily injections of long-acting analogs (insulin glargine or insulin degludec) or intermediate-acting insulin (insulin NPH [Neutral Protamine Hagedorn]; also known as isophane insulin).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 The timing of basal insulin in MDI regimens should be based on both physician and patient preference. It is important that the natural profile of insulin secretion in the body is replicated. Insulin NPH is typically given twice daily. Insulin glargine is usually given once daily and should be delivered at the same time each day, preferably at night (although a morning dose may be preferable if a patient is anxious about nighttime hypoglycemia or if patient preference means this will help improve adherence). However, clinical experience, supported by a small study, suggests that insulin glargine may not last for 24 hours in some patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and may therefore need to be given twice daily for optimum basal coverage.[98]Ashwell SG, Gebbie J, Home PD. Twice-daily compared with once-daily insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes using meal-time insulin aspart. Diabet Med. 2006 Aug;23(8):879-86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16911626?tool=bestpractice.com Some patients take it once daily at night and cover the tail end of the 24-hour period with extra rapid-acting insulin in the evening. Insulin glargine is available in a standard concentration (U-100 strength) or a more concentrated formulation (U-300 strength); the latter prolongs its duration of action and further smooths its profile. The U-300 strength has little peak effect and may reduce hурοglyсеmiа in individuals with type 1 ԁiabetеѕ.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Insulin degludec is longer acting than insulin glargine with a smaller peak effect.[70]Subramanian S, Khan F, Hirsch IB. New advances in type 1 diabetes. BMJ. 2024 Jan 26;384:e075681. https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-075681.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38278529?tool=bestpractice.com It can be given once daily in the morning or evening or any other time of the day. For consistency, this should preferably be delivered at the same time every day.
Prandial (bolus) insulin: rapid-acting insulin analogs (insulin lispro, insulin aspart, or insulin glulisine), ultra-rapid insulin analogs (faster-acting insulin aspart and ultra-rapid insulin lispro), or short-acting insulin (regular/human insulin) are used for prandial dosing. The ultra rapid-acting analogs may cause less hypoglycemia while improving postprandial glucose excursions and administration flexibility (in relation to prandial intake) compared with rapid-acting analogs.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Inhaled insulin may also be an option. It has a more rapid peak and shorter duration of action (1.5 to 3 hours) compared with rapid-acting analogs and can be useful for people with an aversion to injections.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [102]Grant M, Heise T, Baughman R. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled technosphere insulin and subcutaneous insulin lispro in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Mar;61(3):413-22. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34773608?tool=bestpractice.com One study found that its use at mealtimes improved prandial glucose control compared with injectable rapid-acting insulin aspart, without additional hypoglycemia or weight gain.[103]Akturk HK, Snell-Bergeon JK, Rewers A, et al. Improved postprandial glucose with inhaled technosphere insulin compared with insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections: the STAT study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Oct;20(10):639-47. https://www.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2018.0200 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207748?tool=bestpractice.com However, data on its efficacy and safety remain fairly limited, and one 2-year follow-up study of patients previously treated with inhaled insulin could not exclude an increased risk of lung cancer-related mortality.[104]Gatto NM, Koralek DO, Bracken MB, et al. Lung cancer-related mortality with inhaled insulin or a comparator: follow-up study of patients previously enrolled in exubera controlled clinical trials (FUSE) final results. Diabetes Care. 2019 Sep;42(9):1708-15. https://www.doi.org/10.2337/dc18-2529 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31331907?tool=bestpractice.com Inhaled insulin is contraindicated in individuals with chronic lung diseases (including asthma and COPD), and is not recommended in smokers or recent ex-smokers (within the past 6 months).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Measurement of forced expiratory volume is required prior to and after starting inhaled insulin therapy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
For those using an insulin pump, the prandial dose is delivered as a bolus before each meal. For those on MDI, the simplest approach to covering mealtime insulin requirements is to suggest a range of doses, such as 4 units for a small meal, 6 units for a medium-sized meal, and 8 units for a larger meal. However, for greater flexibility of carbohydrate content of meals, pre-meal insulin should be calculated based on the estimated amount of carbohydrate in the meal and the patient's individual insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A simple starting approach is to use one unit of mealtime insulin for every 15 g of carbohydrate in the meal. Patients can use the carbohydrate content per serving listed on food packaging to assess the number of grams in their anticipated meal, but carbohydrate counting is best learned with the help of a nutritionist. Using a food diary and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose measurements, the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio can be adjusted. Estimates of the fat and protein content of meals may be incorporated into prandial dosing for added benefit.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Regular insulin is given about 30 minutes prior to the meal, while rapid-acting insulin can be injected 15 minutes before to shortly after a meal. In children with erratic eating habits, rapid-acting insulin can be given just after the meal. Inhaled insulin is taken at the beginning of a meal.
The regimen should be individualized to obtain the best possible glycemic control. The ADA recommends simplifying complex treatment plans (especially insulin) in older people to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia, polypharmacy, and treatment burden, if this can be achieved within the individualized HbA1c target.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 In older adults, overtreatment of diabetes is common, and steps should be taken to avoid and recognize this.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
The regimen should be individualized to obtain the best possible glycemic control.
Primary options
insulin glargine
or
insulin NPH
or
insulin degludec
-- AND --
insulin regular
or
insulin lispro
or
insulin aspart
or
insulin glulisine
or
insulin inhaled
diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) and lifestyle modifications and cardiovascular risk reduction
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
DSMES is an essential component of type 1 diabetes care.[72]Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2609-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590174?tool=bestpractice.com The objective of DSMES is to provide those living with type 1 diabetes (and their caregivers, if applicable) with the knowledge, skills, and confidence to successfully self-manage their diabetes on a daily basis, thereby reducing the risk of acute and long-term complications while maintaining quality of life.[72]Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2609-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590174?tool=bestpractice.com All patients should be advised to participate in developmentally and culturally appropriate DSMES to facilitate informed decision-making, self-care behaviors, problem-solving, and active collaboration with the healthcare team.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 DSMES should be provided at diagnosis, annually and/or when treatment goals are not being met, when complicating factors develop (e.g., medical, functional, or psychosocial), and when transitions in life and care occur.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Both individual and group settings are recommended for the delivery of effective diabetes self-management education and support, as well as digital methods.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [87]Chatterjee S, Davies MJ, Heller S, et al. Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):130-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970034?tool=bestpractice.com [88]Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, et al. Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study. Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta18200/#/full-report http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690402?tool=bestpractice.com
All patients with diabetes should receive individualized medical nutrition therapy, preferably provided by a registered dietitian who is experienced in providing this type of therapy to diabetes patients.[148]Evert AB, Dennison M, Gardner CD, et al. Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes or prediabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):731-54. https://www.doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0014 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31000505?tool=bestpractice.com There is no standardized dietary advice that is suitable for all individuals with diabetes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A variety of eating patterns are acceptable, and healthcare professionals should emphasize the core principles common among these: inclusion of nonstarchy vegetables, whole fruits, legumes, lean proteins, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and low-fat dairy products or nondairy alternatives; and minimizing consumption of red meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, candy, refined grains, and processed and ultra-processed foods.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 The American Diabetes Association (ADA) also recommends emphasizing minimally processed, nutrient-dense, high-fiber sources of carbohydrate (with a minimum of 14 g of fiber/1000 kcal).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Regular adequate fiber intake has been associated with lower all-cause mortality in diabetes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Carbohydrate counting or consistent carbohydrate intake with respect to time and amount may improve glycemic control. One systematic review and meta-analysis found that in adults with moderately controlled type 1 diabetes, a low-glycemic index dietary pattern resulted in small but important improvements in established targets of glycemic control, blood lipids, adiposity, blood pressure, and inflammation, beyond concurrent treatment with insulin.[149]Chiavaroli L, Lee D, Ahmed A, et al. Effect of low glycaemic index or load dietary patterns on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021 Aug 4;374:n1651. https://www.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1651 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348965?tool=bestpractice.com Rapid-acting insulins and insulin pumps may make timing of meals less crucial than in the past, but regular meals are still important.
Evidence for dietary patterns in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes is limited but what is available suggests that a balanced dietary pattern with increased fiber and reduced ultra-processed carbohydrates is acceptable.[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com Dietary patterns (like the Mediterranean-style or dietary approaches to stop hypertension [DASH]) with a focus on plant-based foods, lean protein, mono- and polyunsaturated fats, and low-fat dairy products (while limiting processed foods and sugary drinks) are linked to improved long-term health outcomes.[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com There is some limited evidence for restricting carbohydrates to improve glycemic and metabolic profiles in youth with type 1 diabetes, but there are also safety concerns with this approach: adverse effects on growth, bone health, and nutrition, and importantly, increased risk of disordered eating (which is already increased in type 1 diabetes).[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com Low- and very low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes are not recommended by the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes or the ADA for generalized use, and the same conclusion was drawn from a 2023 review by the American Academy of Paediatrics.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com If a low- or very-low carbohydrate approach is used, this should only be done with close specialist supervision and monitoring.[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com
The ADA recommends that adults with diabetes should engage in ≥150 minutes/week of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise spread over at least 3 days per week, with no more than 2 consecutive days without exercise.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 For those who are younger and more physically fit, shorter durations (at least 75 minutes/week) of vigorous-intensity exercise or interval training may be sufficient.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Adult patients should also incorporate 2-3 sessions of resistance training per week on nonconsecutive days, and older adults should undertake 2-3 sessions of flexibility and balance training each week.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Prolonged sitting should be interrupted every 30 minutes with short bouts of physical activity for blood glucose benefits.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Children and adolescents with diabetes should aim for ≥60 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic activity daily and vigorous muscle-strengthening and bone-strengthening activities at least 3 days per week.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Preexercise carbohydrate intake and insulin doses can be effectively modified to avoid hypoglycemia during exercise and sports.[153]Aronson R, Brown RE, Li A, et al. Optimal insulin correction factor in post-high-intensity exercise hyperglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: the FIT Study. Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov 19;42(1):10-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455336?tool=bestpractice.com Hypoglycemia can occur up to 24 hours after exercise and may require reducing insulin dosage on days of planned exercise.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [48]International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2024. Dec 2024 [nternet publication]. https://www.ispad.org/resources/ispad-clinical-practice-consensus-guidelines/2024-clinical-practice-consensus-guidelines.html Blood glucose should be checked before, during, and after exercise to monitor for exercise-related hypo- and hyperglycemia, so that these can be appropriately managed (with treatment easily accessible).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A carbohydrate snack may need to be given at the start of exercise if the blood sugar is <90 mg/dL (<5 mmol/L).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
The following should be assessed prior to starting an exercise program: age; physical condition; blood pressure; and presence or absence of autonomic neuropathy or peripheral neuropathy, preproliferative or proliferative retinopathy, or macular edema.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Vigorous exercise may be contraindicated with proliferative or severe preproliferative diabetic retinopathy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Nonweight-bearing exercise may be advisable in some patients with severe peripheral neuropathy (e.g., those with an open sore or foot injury).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Older adults may require a tailored approach to exercise depending on their functional status and the presence of frailty.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Screening for sleep health, including sleep disorders and sleep disruption (e.g., due to diabetes symptoms, management needs, and worry), should be considered, and referral to specialist sleep services made as appropriate.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Sleep disturbance is associated with reduced engagement in diabetes self-management and may affect glycemic control.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 People with diabetes should be counseled on sleep hygiene practices (e.g., consistent sleep schedule, limiting caffeine).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Due to the significant risk of macrovascular complications, the management of patients with type 1 diabetes also involves optimizing cardiovascular risk factors. Well-controlled blood pressure and lipids and avoidance of smoking are essential components of this.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 As a routine part of management, enquire about use of cigarettes (and e-cigarettes/vapes) and other tobacco products, and refer for smoking cessation counseling and pharmacologic therapy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Given its increased prevalence and possible links to diabetes-related health implications (e.g., diabetic ketoacidosis), cannabis-use should also be explored and patients should be counseled not to use recreational cannabis in any form due to the risk of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 The role of antiplatelet agents in primary prevention of CVD is unclear and guidelines differ in their recommendations. Consult your local protocols.
pre-meal insulin correction dose
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
A correction dose may be added to the bolus insulin based on the pre-meal blood glucose level. Correction dosing may be calculated as follows when the patient's total daily dose of insulin (TDD) and food intake is stable: 1800/TDD = the predicted point drop in blood glucose per unit of rapid-acting insulin. For example, if the TDD is 40 units of insulin, 1800/40 = 45 point drop per unit of insulin.
Example of correction dosing based on pre-meal glucose and above calculation:
45-90 mg/dL (2.2 to 4.9 mmol/L): subtract 1 unit from mealtime insulin
91-135 mg/dL (5.0 to 7.4 mmol/L): add 0 units of correction insulin
136-180 mg/dL (7.5 to 9.9 mmol/L): add 1 unit of correction insulin
181-225 mg/dL (9.9 to 12.4 mmol/L): add 2 units of correction insulin
226-270 mg/dL (12.4 to 14.5 mmol/L): add 3 units of correction insulin
271-315 mg/dL (14.5 to 17.3 mmol/L): add 4 units of correction insulin
316-360 mg/dL (17.4 to 19.8 mmol/L): add 5 units of correction insulin
361-405 mg/dL (19.8 to 22.3 mmol/L): add 6 units of correction insulin
>405 mg/dL (>22.3 mmol/L): add 7 units of correction insulin; call healthcare provider.
The number used to calculate the correction dose may be as low as 1500 or as high as 2200. There are no specific guidelines to determine this number. In general, a lower number should be used for insulin-resistant patients with obesity, and a higher number should be used for lean, insulin-sensitive patients.
This correction dose can be added to the patient's mealtime insulin requirement (whether based on general meal size or carbohydrate counting) and given as the total bolus dose. Most insulin pumps use a wizard to automatically calculate the bolus insulin dose, based on user-entered carbohydrate count, and blood glucose monitoring or CGM based on glucose value.[105]Kesavadev J, Saboo B, Krishna MB, et al. Evolution of insulin delivery devices: from syringes, pens, and pumps to DIY artificial pancreas. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jun;11(6):1251-69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7261311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410184?tool=bestpractice.com
amylin analog
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Pramlintide is a synthetic analog of human amylin, a protein that is co-secreted with insulin by pancreatic beta cells. It reduces postprandial glucose increases by prolonging gastric emptying time, reducing postprandial glucagon secretion, and reducing food intake through centrally mediated appetite suppression.[155]Pullman J, Darsow T, Frias JP. Pramlintide in the management of insulin-using patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(3):203-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1993989 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326327?tool=bestpractice.com It is approved for use as an adjunctive treatment (alongside insulin) in adults with type 1 diabetes and postprandial hyperglycemia that cannot be controlled with pre-meal insulin alone.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [155]Pullman J, Darsow T, Frias JP. Pramlintide in the management of insulin-using patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(3):203-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1993989 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326327?tool=bestpractice.com For example, it may be useful in a patient with high postprandial glucose, but who develops late hypoglycemia when pre-meal insulin is increased.
May be given as an injection before each meal to get more stable glycemic control.
At initiation the current pre-meal insulin dose should be reduced by about 50% to avoid hypoglycemia, and then titrated up.
Should not be used in a patient with gastroparesis. The most common side effect is nausea, occurring in 28% to 48% of patients.[155]Pullman J, Darsow T, Frias JP. Pramlintide in the management of insulin-using patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(3):203-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1993989 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17326327?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
pramlintide: 15-60 micrograms subcutaneously before each meal
fixed-dose insulin
Fixed-dose insulin is used when patients are already doing well on a fixed-dose multiple daily injections regimen; or cannot manage 3 to 4 insulin injections daily; or have trouble mixing insulin.
Primary options
insulin NPH/insulin regular
OR
insulin aspart protamine/insulin aspart
OR
insulin lispro protamine/insulin lispro
OR
insulin degludec/insulin aspart
diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) and lifestyle modifications and cardiovascular risk reduction
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
DSMES is an essential component of type 1 diabetes care.[72]Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2609-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590174?tool=bestpractice.com The objective of DSMES is to provide those living with type 1 diabetes (and their caregivers, if applicable) with the knowledge, skills, and confidence to successfully self-manage their diabetes on a daily basis, thereby reducing the risk of acute and long-term complications while maintaining quality of life.[72]Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, et al. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 2021 Dec;64(12):2609-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481000 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34590174?tool=bestpractice.com All patients should be advised to participate in developmentally and culturally appropriate DSMES to facilitate informed decision-making, self-care behaviors, problem-solving, and active collaboration with the healthcare team.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 DSMES should be provided at diagnosis, annually and/or when treatment goals are not being met, when complicating factors develop (e.g., medical, functional, or psychosocial), and when transitions in life and care occur.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Both individual and group settings are recommended for the delivery of effective diabetes self-management education and support, as well as digital methods.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [87]Chatterjee S, Davies MJ, Heller S, et al. Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):130-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970034?tool=bestpractice.com [88]Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, et al. Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study. Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta18200/#/full-report http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690402?tool=bestpractice.com
All patients with diabetes should receive individualized medical nutrition therapy, preferably provided by a registered dietitian who is experienced in providing this type of therapy to diabetes patients.[148]Evert AB, Dennison M, Gardner CD, et al. Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes or prediabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):731-54. https://www.doi.org/10.2337/dci19-0014 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31000505?tool=bestpractice.com There is no standardized dietary advice that is suitable for all individuals with diabetes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A variety of eating patterns are acceptable, and healthcare professionals should emphasize the core principles common among these: inclusion of nonstarchy vegetables, whole fruits, legumes, lean proteins, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and low-fat dairy products or nondairy alternatives; and minimizing consumption of red meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, candy, refined grains, and processed and ultra-processed foods.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 The American Diabetes Association (ADA) also recommends emphasizing minimally processed, nutrient-dense, high-fiber sources of carbohydrate (with a minimum of 14 g of fiber/1000 kcal).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Regular adequate fiber intake has been associated with lower all-cause mortality in diabetes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Carbohydrate counting or consistent carbohydrate intake with respect to time and amount may improve glycemic control. One systematic review and meta-analysis found that in adults with moderately controlled type 1 diabetes, a low-glycemic index dietary pattern resulted in small but important improvements in established targets of glycemic control, blood lipids, adiposity, blood pressure, and inflammation, beyond concurrent treatment with insulin.[149]Chiavaroli L, Lee D, Ahmed A, et al. Effect of low glycaemic index or load dietary patterns on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021 Aug 4;374:n1651. https://www.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1651 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348965?tool=bestpractice.com Rapid-acting insulins and insulin pumps may make timing of meals less crucial than in the past, but regular meals are still important.
Evidence for dietary patterns in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes is limited but what is available suggests that a balanced dietary pattern with increased fiber and reduced ultra-processed carbohydrates is acceptable.[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com Dietary patterns (like the Mediterranean-style or dietary approaches to stop hypertension [DASH]) with a focus on plant-based foods, lean protein, mono- and poly-unsaturated fats, and low-fat dairy products (while limiting processed foods and sugary drinks) are linked to improved long-term health outcomes.[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com There is some limited evidence for restricting carbohydrates to improve glycemic and metabolic profiles in youth with type 1 diabetes, but there are also safety concerns with this approach: adverse effects on growth, bone health, and nutrition, and importantly, increased risk of disordered eating (which is already increased in type 1 diabetes).[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com Low- and very low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes are not recommended by the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes or the ADA for generalized use, and the same conclusion was drawn from a 2023 review by the American Academy of Paediatrics.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com If a low- or very-low carbohydrate approach is used, this should only be done with close specialist supervision and monitoring.[150]Neyman A, Hannon TS. Low-carbohydrate diets in children and adolescents with or at risk for diabetes. Pediatrics. 2023 Oct 1;152(4):e2023063755. https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/152/4/e2023063755/193955/Low-Carbohydrate-Diets-in-Children-and-Adolescents?autologincheck=redirected http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37718964?tool=bestpractice.com
The ADA recommends that adults with diabetes should engage in ≥150 minutes/week of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise spread over at least 3 days per week, with no more than 2 consecutive days without exercise.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 For those who are younger and more physically fit, shorter durations (at least 75 minutes/week) of vigorous-intensity exercise or interval training may be sufficient. Adult patients should also incorporate 2-3 sessions of resistance training per week on nonconsecutive days, and older adults should undertake 2-3 sessions of flexibility and balance training each week.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Prolonged sitting should be interrupted every 30 minutes with short bouts of physical activity for blood glucose benefits.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Children and adolescents with diabetes should aim for ≥60 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic activity daily and vigorous muscle-strengthening and bone-strengthening activities at least 3 days per week.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Preexercise carbohydrate intake and insulin doses can be effectively modified to avoid hypoglycemia during exercise and sports.[153]Aronson R, Brown RE, Li A, et al. Optimal insulin correction factor in post-high-intensity exercise hyperglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: the FIT Study. Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov 19;42(1):10-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455336?tool=bestpractice.com Hypoglycemia can occur up to 24 hours after exercise and may require reducing insulin dosage on days of planned exercise.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [48]International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2024. Dec 2024 [nternet publication]. https://www.ispad.org/resources/ispad-clinical-practice-consensus-guidelines/2024-clinical-practice-consensus-guidelines.html Blood glucose should be checked before, during, and after exercise to monitor for exercise-related hypo- and hyperglycemia, so that these can be appropriately managed (with treatment easily accessible).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A carbohydrate snack may need to be given at the start of exercise if the blood sugar is <90 mg/dL (<5 mmol/L).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
The following should be assessed prior to starting an exercise program: age; physical condition; blood pressure; and presence or absence of autonomic neuropathy or peripheral neuropathy, preproliferative or proliferative retinopathy, or macular edema.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Vigorous exercise may be contraindicated with proliferative or severe preproliferative diabetic retinopathy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Nonweight-bearing exercise may be advisable in some patients with severe peripheral neuropathy (e.g., those with an open sore or foot injury).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Older adults may require a tailored approach to exercise depending on their functional status and the presence of frailty.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Screening for sleep health, including sleep disorders and sleep disruption (e.g., due to diabetes symptoms, management needs, and worry), should be considered, and referral to specialist sleep services made as appropriate.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Sleep disturbance is associated with reduced engagement in diabetes self-management and may affect glycemic control.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 People with diabetes should be counseled on sleep hygiene practices (e.g., consistent sleep schedule, limiting caffeine).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Due to the significant risk of macrovascular complications, the management of patients with type 1 diabetes also involves optimizing cardiovascular risk factors. Well-controlled blood pressure and lipids and avoidance of smoking are essential components of this.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 As a routine part of management, enquire about use of cigarettes (and e-cigarettes/vapes) and other tobacco products, and refer for smoking cessation counseling and pharmacologic therapy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Given its increased prevalence and possible links to diabetes-related health implications (e.g., diabetic ketoacidosis), cannabis-use should also be explored and patients should be counseled not to use recreational cannabis in any form due to the risk of cannabis hyperemesis syndrome.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 The role of antiplatelet agents in primary prevention of CVD is unclear and guidelines differ in their recommendations. Consult your local protocols.
pregnant
basal-bolus insulin
Individuals with diabetes are at a higher risk of miscarriage and having infants with major congenital malformations than the general population.[156]McCance DR, Casey C. Type 1 Diabetes in pregnancy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2019 Sep;48(3):495-509. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31345519?tool=bestpractice.com Other complications include macrosomia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, and preeclampsia.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com Euglycemia or near-euglycemia reduces the risk of complications.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com
Prior to conception, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends a target HbA1c goal of <6.5% (<48 mmol/mol) if this can be achieved without hypoglycemia, as this has been shown to reduce fetal and maternal risks.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A goal of <6% (<42 mmol/mol) is recommended during pregnancy; however, the ADA advises that this may be relaxed to <7% (<53 mmol/mol) if necessary to prevent hypoglycemia.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 For those using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), suggested goals are time in range (TIR) >70% (range 63-140 mg/dL [3.5 to 7.8 mmol/L]), with time below range (TBR) <4% (<63 mg/dL [3.5 mmol/L]). Use of CGM during pregnancy may help to improve glycemic control and neonatal outcomes, and the ADA recommends its use in pregnancy in addition to (but not as a substitute for) blood glucose monitoring for those with type 1 diabetes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [172]Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, et al; CONCEPTT Collaborative Group. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2347-59. [Erratum in: Lancet. 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2346.] https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)32400-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923465?tool=bestpractice.com [173]Chang VYX, Tan YL, Ang WHD, et al. Effects of continuous glucose monitoring on maternal and neonatal outcomes in perinatal women with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;184:109192. https://www.endocrinepractice.org/article/S1530-891X(21)00165-8/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35032563?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients should monitor their blood glucose from 4 to 7 times per day (or use CGM) and the pattern should be examined every few weeks early in pregnancy so that nutrition content and timing, exercise patterns, and the insulin doses can be modified to achieve optimal control.
Intensive insulin should be administered for the management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy, either via continuous infusion with an insulin pump or in a regimen of multiple daily injections (MDI).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com The use of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems has shown promise for the management of type 1 diabetes during pregnancy but no HCL pump in the US has FDA approval for use in pregnancy.[174]Lee TTM, Collett C, Bergford S, et al. Automated insulin delivery in women with pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 26;389(17):1566-78. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2303911 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37796241?tool=bestpractice.com [175]Newman C, Ero A, Dunne FP. Glycaemic control and novel technology management strategies in pregestational diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:1109825. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9877346 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36714590?tool=bestpractice.com A patient who was using an insulin pump and CGM prepregnancy should continue using these devices but switch to manual mode during pregnancy. This is because HCL systems are not designed for the very tight glycemic control needed during pregnancy. Patients well controlled on MDI are usually not switched to an insulin pump due to fear of worsening of glycemic control during the transition period. However, those with poor diabetes control on MDI may be candidates for insulin pump initiation during pregnancy.
Total daily dose requirements can be estimated based on weight, with typical doses ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 units/kg/day.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A starting dose of 0.5 units/kg/day is usually appropriate for metabolically stable adults, but higher doses are required during pregnancy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
There may be increased sensitivity to insulin in early pregnancy, resulting in increased risk of hypoglycemia.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 By about 16 weeks of gestation, insulin resistance starts increasing, rising until around week 36, often leading to a doubling of the daily insulin requirements compared with prepregnancy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Insulin resistance significantly reduces immediately postpartum, requiring further dosage adjustments (initial postpartum requirements are often ~50% that of prepregnancy).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Commonly used insulins during pregnancy include insulin NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn; also known as isophane insulin), regular/human insulin, and the rapid-acting analogs insulin lispro and insulin aspart.[168]Mathiesen ER, Hod M, Ivanisevic M, et al; Detemir in Pregnancy Study Group. Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Oct;35(10):2012-7. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/35/10/2012.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22851598?tool=bestpractice.com Limited evidence suggests that these rapid-acting analogs may be associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia and improved glycemic control compared with regular/human insulin.[169]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. Dec 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3 There are no large randomized trials supporting the safety of insulin glargine in pregnancy.[170]Lv S, Wang J, Xu Y. Safety of insulin analogs during pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):749-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25855052?tool=bestpractice.com However, it has been safely used in many patients.[159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com It should be considered second-line to insulin NPH for basal insulin dosing during pregnancy because there are fewer long-term safety monitoring data. There are limited data regarding the use of insulin degludec during pregnancy; however, one randomized controlled trial of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (EXPECT) compared its efficacy and safety with insulin detemir (a long-acting insulin analog, production of which has now been discontinued) and found it to be noninferior.[171]Mathiesen ER, Alibegovic AC, Corcoy R, et al. Insulin degludec versus insulin detemir, both in combination with insulin aspart, in the treatment of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (EXPECT): an open‑label, multinational, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Feb;11(2):86-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36623517?tool=bestpractice.com
There may be increased sensitivity to insulin in early pregnancy, resulting in a greater risk of hypoglycemia.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 By about 16 weeks of gestation, insulin resistance starts increasing and rises until around week 36, often leading to a doubling of the daily insulin requirements compared with prepregnancy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Insulin resistance significantly reduces immediately postpartum, requiring further dosage adjustments (initial postpartum requirements are often ~50% that of prepregnancy).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Owing to the complexity of insulin management during pregnancy, referral to a specialist center that can offer multidisciplinary care is desirable.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Primary options
insulin NPH
-- AND --
insulin regular
or
insulin lispro
or
insulin aspart
Secondary options
insulin glargine
-- AND --
insulin regular
or
insulin lispro
or
insulin aspart
low-dose aspirin
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Daily low-dose aspirin is recommended to reduce the risk of preeclampsia in all pregnant individuals with preexisting type 1 diabetes. The American Diabetes Association recommends starting this treatment at 12-16 weeks’ gestation, while the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends starting it between 12 and 28 weeks’ gestation, but ideally before 16 weeks.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 [159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com Once started, it should be taken until delivery. See Preeclampsia.
lifestyle measures and evaluation for complications/comorbidities and drug history review
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Nutrition counseling, endorsing a balance of macronutrients, and extra focus on physical activity and diabetes self-care education, is recommended.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Individuals with diabetes have an increased risk of having infants with neural tube defects compared with the general population and, as for those without diabetes, should take a folic acid supplement prior to and during pregnancy.[165]Tinker SC, Gilboa SM, Moore CA, et al. Specific birth defects in pregnancies of women with diabetes: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):176.e1-176. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186569 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31454511?tool=bestpractice.com
Ideally, individuals should also be evaluated before pregnancy for diabetes complications and comorbidities, including retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, and possible cardiovascular disease, which may worsen during or complicate pregnancy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Retinopathy is of particular concern, as for some patients, particularly those with proliferative rеtiոоpаthy, it may worsen as the pregnancy progresses. This is related to the often rapid intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy, as well as рrеgոanϲy-related vascular, volume, and hormonal changes.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Pregnant women should be appropriately counseled and have an eye exam in the first trimester. They should then be monitored every trimester and for 1 year postpartum as indicated by the degree of retinopathy and as recommended by the eye care healthcare professional.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Most studies have failed to demonstrate permanent deterioration in renal function associated with pregnancy in women with mild-to-moderate diabetic nephropathy.[161]Young EC, Pires ML, Marques LP, et al. Effects of pregnancy on the onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy and of diabetic nephropathy on pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2011 Jul-Sep;5(3):137-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22813566?tool=bestpractice.com [162]Rossing K, Jacobsen P, Hommel E, et al. Pregnancy and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetologia. 2002 Jan;45(1):36-41. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s125-002-8242-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11845221?tool=bestpractice.com However, progression to end-stage renal disease has been reported in women with serum creatinine levels exceeding 1.5 mg/dL or severe proteinuria (more than 3 g per 24 hours) at baseline.[159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com Women with preexisting diabetic nephropathy are at significantly higher risk for several adverse obstetric complications, including hypertensive disorders, uteroplacental insufficiency, and iatrogenic preterm birth because of worsening renal function.[159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com Before becoming pregnant, a baseline evaluation of renal function by serum creatinine and assessment of urinary protein excretion (urine protein-to-creatinine ratio or 24-hour protein excretion) are recommended with follow-up measurements at regular intervals throughout pregnancy.[159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com If a 24-hour collection for creatinine clearance has not been done in the year before pregnancy, it is common for this assessment to be done early in pregnancy to establish a baseline.[159]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on practice bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin no. 201: pregestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30461693?tool=bestpractice.com
Drugs should be reviewed and potentially teratogenic drugs discontinued. In particular, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin-II receptor antagonists should be discontinued preconception (and avoided in individuals of childbearing potential not using reliable contraception).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Hypertension should be treated with agents considered safe in pregnancy.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 These include methyldopa, nifedipine, labetalol, and clonidine.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Atenolol is not recommended, but other beta-blockers may be used, if necessary.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Diuretic use during pregnancy is generally not recommended, although it may be used safely when prescribed at lower doses for individuals in certain circumstances (e.g., chronic kidney disease and reduced glomerular filtration rate).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 A blood pressure threshold of 140/90 mmHg for initiation or titration of therapy is associated with better pregnancy outcomes than reserving treatment for severe hypertension.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 There are limited data on the optimal lower limit, but the American Diabetes Association recommends a blood pressure goal of 110-135/85 mmHg and advises that therapy should be deintensified if blood pressure is <90/60 mmHg.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
In individuals with type 2 diabetes on a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, the Endocrine Society suggests ideally discontinuing this treatment and actively managing glycemia before conception, rather than discontinuation of the GLP-1 receptor agonist between the start of pregnancy and the end of the first trimester.[160]Wyckoff JA, Lapolla A, Asias-Dinh BD, et al. Preexisting diabetes and pregnancy: an Endocrine Society and European Society of Endocrinology joint clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Aug 7;110(9):2405-52. https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/110/9/2405/8196670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40652453?tool=bestpractice.com Sudden discontinuation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist may cause hyperglycemia and weight gain, which increases the risk for congenital malformations and spontaneous abortion.
In most circumstances, nonstatin lipid-lowering drugs (e.g., bempedoic acid, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, fibrates) should be stopped at the first pregnancy visit (or ideally prior to conception).[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 However, continuation of statins can be considered in women at high-risk, such as those with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or familial hypercholesterolemia, as part of a shared decision-making process between patients and their healthcare team.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1 Hydrophilic statins, such as pravastatin, may be associated with less fetal harm than lipophilic statins.[1]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2025. Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan;48(1):S344-52. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/48/Supplement_1
Antepartum fetal surveillance is routinely used during pregnancy to monitor for complications and assess the risk of fetal death in pregnant individuals with a preexisting condition such as diabetes.[164]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 229: antepartum fetal surveillance. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2021/06/antepartum-fetal-surveillance Antepartum fetal surveillance techniques in clinical use include maternal perception of fetal movement, contraction stress test, nonstress test, biophysical profile (BPP), modified BPP, and umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advises that surveillance can be appropriately initiated at 32 weeks gestation (or later) in most at-risk patients (but may be used earlier if indicated and if delivery would be considered for perinatal benefit).[164]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 229: antepartum fetal surveillance. Jun 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2021/06/antepartum-fetal-surveillance
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer