Ultrasonography is the most widely used screening and surveillance imaging method for the evaluation of AAA.[6]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriatness criteria: screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. 2023 [internet publication].
https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3194112/Narrative
Ultrasonography is safe, portable, easy to operate, and proven beneficial for screening of AAA, with high sensitivity and specificity and a high accuracy comparable to computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or magnetic resonance angiography.[6]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriatness criteria: screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. 2023 [internet publication].
https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3194112/Narrative
[94]Liisberg M, Diederichsen AC, Lindholt JS. Abdominal ultrasound-scanning versus non-contrast computed tomography as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm - a validation study from the randomized DANCAVAS study. BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Feb 14;17(1):14.
https://bmcmedimaging.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12880-017-0186-8
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193267?tool=bestpractice.com
Screening 65-year-old men for AAA significantly reduces AAA-specific mortality.[95]Wanhainen A, Hultgren R, Linné A, et al; Swedish Aneurysm Screening Study Group (SASS). Outcome of the Swedish Nationwide Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program. Circulation. 2016 Oct 18;134(16):1141-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27630132?tool=bestpractice.com
[96]Ali MU, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Kenny M, et al. A systematic review of short-term vs long-term effectiveness of one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men with ultrasound. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):612-23.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30037679?tool=bestpractice.com
[97]Guirguis-Blake JM, Beil TL, Senger CA, et al. Primary care screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2219-38.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.17021
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821436?tool=bestpractice.com
US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations include:[4]Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-8.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2757234
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821437?tool=bestpractice.com
[5]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J 3rd, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322642?tool=bestpractice.com
One-time screening for AAA with ultrasonography in men ages 65 to 75 years who have ever smoked
Selective screening (based on an assessment of risk factors, including older age and a first-degree relative with a AAA) for AAA in men ages 65 to 75 years who have never smoked.
There is insufficient evidence for benefit of one-time AAA population screening for women.[4]Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-8.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2757234
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821437?tool=bestpractice.com
[98]Ali MU, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Miller J, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic adults. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(6):1855-68.
https://www.jvascsurg.org/article/S0741-5214(16)30828-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871502?tool=bestpractice.com
[99]Sweeting MJ, Masconi KL, Jones E, et al. Analysis of clinical benefit, harms, and cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet. 2018 Aug 11;392(10146):487-95.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31222-4/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30057105?tool=bestpractice.com
The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of screening for AAA in women ages 65 to 75 years who have never smoked and have no family history of AAA outweigh the benefits.[4]Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-8.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2757234
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821437?tool=bestpractice.com
The USPSTF maintains that there is insufficient evidence to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for AAA in women ages 65 to 75 years with risk factors for AAA (ever smoked or with a family history of AAA).[4]Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2211-8.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2757234
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31821437?tool=bestpractice.com
However, this patient group is included in the screening guidelines from the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery, and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommend that screening of female smokers is cost effective.[5]Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J 3rd, et al. 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Dec 13;146(24):e334-e482.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36322642?tool=bestpractice.com
[100]Kapila V, Jetty P, Wooster D, et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in Canada: 2020 review and position statement of the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery. Can J Surg. 2021 Sep 1;64(5):E461-E466.
https://www.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.009120
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34467750?tool=bestpractice.com
Some data suggest that the USPSTF screening criteria detect fewer than one third of patients who ultimately undergo surgical repair of AAA; two groups at particular risk of AAA requiring surgical intervention but who are currently excluded from the screening guidelines include people under the age of 65 who smoke and those over 70 who have never smoked.[101]Carnevale ML, Koleilat I, Lipsitz EC, et al. Extended screening guidelines for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):1917-1926.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.03.047
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325228?tool=bestpractice.com
It has been postulated, therefore, that expanding the screening criteria for AAA may be reasonable and justified.[102]Paraskevas KI. The rationale for extending screening guidelines for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):1113.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.157
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33632500?tool=bestpractice.com