Acute pneumolabyrinth: a rare complication after cochlear implantation in a patient with obstructive sleep apnoea on CPAP therapy
- 1 Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Sicilia, Italy
- 2 U.O.C. Otorinolaringoiatria, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Sicilia, Italy
- Correspondence to Dr Francesco Dispenza; francescodispenza@gmail.com
Abstract
Pneumolabyrinth is a condition characterised by the presence of air within the inner ear and is a rare complication after cochlear implant surgery. One of the causes of pneumolabyrinth may be the increase in pressure in the middle ear. The use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an effective treatment strategy for obstructive sleep apnoea. According to a recent study, the use of CPAP should be delayed by 1 or 2 weeks in subjects undergoing middle ear surgery; however, there is currently no indication to delay the CPAP in subjects undergoing cochlear implant surgery. We report the case of a patient on CPAP who underwent left cochlear implantation and, in the early postoperative period, reported severe vertigo and tinnitus. Cone-beam CT of the temporal bone revealed the presence of pneumolabyrynth. We believe that the use of CPAP should be delayed in subjects undergoing cochlear implantation to avoid the development of acute pneumolabyrinth.
Background
Pneumolabyrinth is a condition characterised by the presence of air in the perilymphatic space of the inner ear. This condition, first described by Mafee et al in 1984, is a radiological finding characterised by the presence of air bubbles localised indifferently at the level of the cochlea, utricle, saccule or semicircular canals.1 In most cases, pneumolabyrinth results from the formation of a perilymphatic fistula due to a traumatic event such as fractures of the temporal bone and barotrauma, or as an iatrogenic complication after ossiculoplasty, stapes surgery or cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations. This condition is instead rarely described in subjects not affected by cochlear malformations.2 We report the case of a pneumolabyrinth affecting the left vestibule developed as acute complication after left cochlear implantation in a patient with bilateral severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy.
Case presentation
A middle-aged male patient presented with congenital severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss on both sides to receive a cochlear implantation to restore hearing. The patient was treated with hearing aids in childhood. Its medical history reported high blood pressure, atherosclerosis, a previous episode of bulbar ischaemia and OSA on CPAP therapy. The patient did not report any traumatic events, use of ototoxic drugs or family history of hearing loss. Physical examination was normal in all the districts, and no signs of malformations of the inner or middle ear were detected at MRI and CT scans. Preoperative diagnostics were performed which did not reveal any contraindications to surgery. After receiving informed consent, the patient underwent left cochlear implantation. The surgical approach was performed by a posterior tympanotomy with insertion of the electrode through a cochleostomy obtained by means of a 1 mm burr. After electrode insertion, the cochleostomy was obliterated with autologous muscle tissue. CPAP therapy was administered during the first night of hospitalisation, as per protocol followed by the patient before the surgery. The day after surgery, the patient reported onset of left high-pitched tinnitus, severe rotatory vertigo, nausea and vomiting.
Investigations
The clinical vestibular examination included: searching for spontaneous nystagmus with video-Frenzel, Dix-Hallpike test and supine roll test to exclude positional vertigo; head shaking test (HST), head impulse test (HIT), skew test, Romberg test and Unterberger-Fukuda test. The examination showed a spontaneous right-beating horizontal (grade 3) nystagmus with HIT, HST, Romberg test and Unterberger-Fukuda test, revealing a left vestibular deficit. The skew test was negative. To confirm the hypothesis of a dislocation of the cochlear electrode from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli, a cone-beam CT scan of the left ear was performed. Through the study of the images in axial, coronal and sagittal projection and through the 3D reconstructions of the inner ear, it was possible to detect the correct positioning of the cochlear electrode in the tympanic scale with an insertion angle of about 400°. The CT scan allowed to exclude a dislocation of the electrode. The evaluation of the posterior labyrinth led to the identification of a pneumolabyrinth characterised by the presence of multiple air bubbles located mainly at the utricular level and resulting as the main cause of the symptoms complained by the patient (figure 1).
Coronal and axial cone-beam CT images.

Treatment
The patient was treated with conservative care including bed rest, antibiotics (ceftriaxone 2 g/day, for 1 week), corticosteroids (prednisone 25 mg, 2×1/day in the first 3 days, then tapered over 10 days) and vestibular suppression (cinnarizine 20 mg + dimenhydrinate 40 mg 2×1/day for 10 days). After 3 days of therapy, the patient reported a reduction of symptoms, and therefore, 5 days after the surgery, he was discharged from the hospital with the recommendation to continue bed rest and medical therapy, as prescribed.
Outcome and follow-up
A follow-up was carried out to understand the evolution of the vestibular deficit. One month after surgery, the patient reported resolution of symptoms with disappearance of the tinnitus and persistence of mild dizziness. The evaluation was performed by means of video HIT (vHIT) and by measuring the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (c-VEMPs).
We used the Eye-See-Cam system (Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) to record vHIT. The patient was seated 1.5 m in front of a target and was asked to continue watching it as his head was passively rotated by the examiner. The head was exposed to passive high acceleration and low-amplitude rotations in the planes of the horizontal semicircular canals. The patient’s eye movements were evaluated using video-oculography, while his head movements were recorded using inertial sensors. At least 15 valid head impulses were recorded for each horizontal semicircular canal. The vestibulo-ocular reflex gains during the vHIT (eye velocity/head velocity) were automatically measured using a software that computed the slope of the regression between head and eye velocity. Abnormal functioning of the canal was taken into consideration in case of gain asymmetry >5% and mean gain in vHIT <0.8 for the lateral canals with detection of catch-up (corrective) saccades.3 The examination detected a gain of 0.76 on the right side and 0.02 on the left side with the presence of overt and covert saccades on the left and asymmetry of 82%, as shown in figure 2.
Video head impulse test.

c-VEMPs were recorded with Socrates (Hedera Biomedics S.r.l., Taranto, Italy) with biofeedback of the muscle contraction on the monitor. Biofeedback was used to reduce the variability in case of difference in muscle contraction between the two sides and was achieved through a digital LED and displayed waveform rectification for a realistic comparison between the ipsilateral and contralateral amplitudes.
The negative electrode was placed at the middle third of the sternocleidomastoid muscle ipsilateral to the acoustic stimuli, the positive electrode was placed on the middle third of the clavicle and the ground electrode on the forehead; the patient was lying in a supine position with the head rotated contralateral to the acoustic stimuli, and the recording started by asking the patient to flex the head to the sternum by maintaining the position during the examination. The acoustic stimuli were air conducted by earphone inserts as tone burst 500 Hz, 130 dB sound pressure level and repeated 200 times. The presence and repeatability of the curve as well as amplitude and latency of the p13–n23 complex were evaluated; the asymmetry between the two sides above 33% was considered as pathological.4 As shown in figure 3, it was not possible to identify p13 and n23 waves on the left side. The results of the diagnostic tests therefore confirmed the presence of a left vestibular hypofunction.
Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

The patient was evaluated again at 3 and 6 months. During both the evaluations, the patient reported the persistence of mild dizziness. The vHIT test and c-VEMPs test confirmed the persistence of a left vestibular hypofunction. At the end of each evaluation, the patient was advised to undertake vestibular rehabilitation.
From an auditory rehabilitation point of view, the activation and fitting of the cochlear implant took place regularly according to the Italian guidelines.5
Discussion
Pneumolabyrinth is a rare clinical condition characterised by the presence of air within the inner ear. The prevalence of this condition, also called pneumocochlea or pneumovestibule, depending on the air site in the inner ear, is not affected by age or ethnicity, but it is higher in men probably due to the greater exposure to head injuries. Temporal bone trauma represents indeed the most common cause of pneumolabyrinth making up to 8% of all temporal bone fractures and almost 50% of otic capsule-violating temporal bone fractures.6 7 Post-traumatic pneumolabyrinth can be also caused by stapes subluxation, stapes fracture, and oval and/or round window membrane lesions. Other mechanisms associated with the development of pneumolabyrinth include barotrauma, chronic middle or inner ear inflammation, such as cholesteatoma and tumours, otic capsule dehiscence and iatrogenic complication of middle ear surgery, such as stapedectomy, stapedotomy, ossiculoplasty and cochlear implant, especially in patients with inner ear malformation.8–11 In each of these mechanisms, the condition causing the access of air into the inner ear is determined by direct communication between the inner and the middle ear, condition also known as perilymphatic fistula. Clinical presentation is often characterised by the development of sensorineural or mixed hearing loss, tinnitus, aural fullness, vertigo and dizziness.12 As far as the iatrogenic forms are concerned, the most frequent cause of pneumolabyrinth in the early postoperative period is the stapedectomy followed by stapedotomy.13
The pneumolabyrinth due to cochlear implant surgery reported in the scientific literature occurs in patients affected by malformation of the inner ear such as dilated vestibular aqueduct syndrome, in cases of patients with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt valve or in patients who have undergone impressive postoperative valsalva manoeuvre.14–17 However, the development of pneumolabyrinth in patients with a non-malformed inner ear is usually considered a rare event.
In a recent study by Im et al, the incidence of pneumolabyrinth was studied in 53 adult patients without inner ear malformations undergone cochlear implantation.18 Patients underwent CT scan 3 days after surgery, and the correlation between the presence of air in the inner ear and some clinical variables was evaluated including type of implant, type of surgical approach, site and volume of the pneumolabyrinth and appearance of symptoms. The results of this study revealed that the pneumolabyrinth was present in 100% of patients and that its mean volume was 8.49 mm3. Furthermore, it was found that the volume of the pneumolabyrinth was greater in all those patients with postoperative dizziness (10.43 mm3 vs 8.01 mm3). Finally, of the 53 patients, only 1 presented vestibular involvement. According to these results, the authors concluded that a certain amount of pneumolabyrinth in the cochlear site is always present in the early stage after cochlear implantation, even in the absence of symptoms.
Karataş et al reported a case of pneumolabyrinth after left cochlear implantation in a young female patient.19 In this case, the surgeon opted for an electrode insertion through a deep promontory cochleostomy anterior superiorly to the round window, identifying both the tympanic and vestibular scales. In the early postoperative period, the patient reported severe vertigo. Due to the suspect of a dislocation of the electrode in the vestibular scale, a control CT was performed which allowed to detect a correct positioning of the electrode and the presence of pneumolabyrinth. A conservative treatment was carried out which included rest and medical therapy leading to a remission of symptoms in about 10 days. In this case, the authors of the study justified the pneumolabyrinth as a consequence of excessive drilling in the depth of the promontory with consequent damage to the basilar membrane and access of air into the vestibular area.
Hempel et al reported a case of pneumolabyrinth that occurred following a strong sneeze after an infection of the upper airway tract in a patient who had previously undergone a cochlear implant.15
The authors hypothesised that, in this case, the use of a large cochleostomy (1.5 mm) could have been the cause of the access of air into the labyrinth after the Valsalva manoeuvre induced by a strong sneeze and being the cochleostomy an area of less resistance to pressure changes in the middle ear.
As known, CPAP is the conservative treatment of first choice in patients with OSA, followed by surgery in patients who do not tolerate or do not benefit from the treatment.20
In 2020, Cass and Babu published a study in which, through an electronic survey carried out using the newsletter of the American Neurotologist Society, they evaluated the experience of the use of postoperative CPAP in patients with OSA undergoing middle ear surgery, stapes surgery, lateral skull base surgery and cochlear implant surgery.21 CPAP, through the development of positive pressure, allows to oppose the tendency of the upper airways to collapse. However, the development of this positive pressure is also transmitted to the middle ear through the eustachian tube and may potentially interfere with the results of a recent ear surgery. In this study, the survey carried out by 54 otosurgeons found an almost total agreement in the choice of delaying CPAP therapy by 1 or 2 weeks in subjects undergoing middle ear surgery, stapes surgery and skull base surgery; on the contrary, in cochlear implant surgery, immediate use of CPAP therapy was the most employed practice.
In our clinical case, the patient denied having performed voluntary valsalva manoeuvres or any strong sneeze. Therefore, our use of a ‘soft surgery’ associated with a small cochleostomy, techniques that minimise the entry of air into the vestibule, led us to hypothesise that the use of CPAP in the immediate postsurgery could have been the determining cause of the acute pneumolabyrinth.
From our experience, we believe that the use of CPAP therapy should be delayed in subjects undergoing cochlear implantation to avoid the development of acute pneumolabyrinth. To confirm these conclusions, however, studies on a larger number of cases are needed to evaluate, based on the pressure levels applied, the risk of developing complications and therefore the cases that should delay the resumption of CPAP therapy.
Learning points
-
Vertigo symptoms following cochlear implant surgery in patients without inner ear malformations should suggest electrode dislocation or acute pneumolabyrinth.
-
A complete clinical evaluation with instrumental (video head impulse test and cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials) and radiological investigations (HRCT (High resolution computed tomography) or CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) of the ear) can guide towards the correct diagnosis.
-
Use of continuous positive airway pressure in the immediate postoperative period after cochlear implant surgery should be avoided to reduce the risk of pneumolabyrinth.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors All authors have contributed to paper realisation. Conceptualisation: FD and AI. Methodology: FD and AI. Validation: FD. Investigation: FL and FS. Resources: FL and FS. Writing—original draft preparation: AI. Writing—review and editing: FD. Project administration: FD. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer