Iatrogenic common peroneal nerve injury during harvesting of semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- Raf Mens ,
- Albert van Houten ,
- Roy Bernardus Gerardus Brokelman and
- Roy Hoogeslag
- Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland, Hengelo, The Netherlands
- Correspondence to Dr Roy Bernardus Gerardus Brokelman; R.brokelman@ocon.nl
Abstract
We present a case of iatrogenic injury to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) occurring due to harvesting of a hamstring graft, using a posterior mini-incision technique. A twitch of the foot was noted on retraction of the tendon stripper. After clinically diagnosing a CPN palsy proximal to the knee, the patient was referred to a neurosurgeon within 24 hours. An electromyography (EMG) was not obtained since it cannot accurately differentiate between partial and complete nerve injury in the first week after injury. Because the nerve might have been transacted by the tendon stripper, surgical exploration within 72 hours after injury was indicated. An intraneural haematoma was found and neurolysis was performed to decompress the nerve. Functioning of the anterior cruciate ligament was satisfactory during follow-up. Complete return of motor function of the CPN was observed at 1-year follow-up, with some remaining hypoaesthesia.
Background
Autologous hamstring grafts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. While injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is a well-documented complication of harvesting the hamstring graft, injury to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) has rarely been described.1 2 The CPN originates from the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve, which occurs at a variable level, from as proximal as before exiting the pelvis, to as distal as 7 cm above the epicondylar line.3 The CPN courses through the posterolateral compartment of the thigh and typically runs along the medial side of the long head of the biceps femoris. In around 20% of cases, the CPN is found deep to the long head and along the medial border of the short head of the biceps femoris.4 The exact anatomical relation and average distance between the CPN and the semitendinosus tendon have, to the best of our knowledge, not been reported in the literature.
Case presentation
A 26-year-old man sustained an isolated ACL rupture of the left knee following a soccer injury. Two months after the injury, he was planned for an ACL reconstruction using an ipsilateral autologous semitendinosus tendon. Surgery was performed by one of the consulting orthopaedic surgeons (AvH) at our institution, at the time of his Knee and Sports Medicine fellowship. The procedure was performed under spinal anaesthesia with an adductor canal block. The tendon was harvested using a mini-incision technique5 (figure 1) (the technique described by Prodromos was later altered to a single posterior mini-incision, as described in the current paper). With this technique, the tendon is palpated at the posteromedial side of the popliteal fossa and is luxated through the skin via a small (±2–3 cm) incision at that level. An open-ended tendon stripper (figure 2) is advanced proximally over the tendon to strip it off of the muscle. A closed-ended stripper is then used to strip the tendon from its insertion on the anteromedial side of the proximal tibia.
Diagram showing the anatomy of the posterior thigh, including the common peroneal nerve and the location of the posterior mini-incision. Reprinted from Chadwick C, Prodromos MD, et al. Posterior mini-incision technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft harvest. Arthroscopy 2005;21:130–137 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America, with permission from Elsevier. a., artery; n., nerve; v., vein.

Detail of the tip of an open-ended tendon stripper as used for the proximal part of the semitendinosus tendon.

In this particular case, on retraction of the tendon stripper that was advanced proximally, a twitch of the ipsilateral foot was noted. Because the graft of the semitendinosus tendon was too short (18.5 cm), a semitendinosus allograft was used instead. The surgical procedure was completed without further complications.
After the patient had returned to the ward, a drop foot was noted on the operated leg. This was explained at that time due to residual effects of the spinal anaesthesia.
Investigations
Neurological examination the next morning showed paralysis of the tibialis anterior and peroneus muscles, with normal strength in the quadriceps, hamstring and triceps surae muscles. Sensation of touch was absent over the medial aspect of the distal thigh, the anterolateral aspect of the leg and the dorsum of the foot. No signs of wound complications, thrombosis or large haematoma were present. An electromyographic (EMG) study was not performed since at our institution we usually only request one, when a consulted neurologist or neurosurgeon advises to do so. Depending on the diagnostic purpose, EMG is usually performed weeks or months after the injury is sustained.6 In the first week, an EMG is primarily useful to localise the site of injury. Distinguishing complete from incomplete nerve injury is most sensitive between 1 week and 2 weeks after the injury is sustained.6 Since the location of the injury was roughly know given the mechanism of injury, an EMG would not have been of added value in the first week.
Differential diagnosis
A CPN palsy proximal to the knee was diagnosed, caused by either an iatrogenic transection, compression by haematoma, neuropraxia of the CPN caused by the tendon stripper or neuropraxia caused by the tourniquet or the leg holder. Both sharp nerve transection and compression by haematoma are indications for surgical exploration within days.6
Treatment
An ankle-foot orthosis was fitted, and after immediate consultation with a neurosurgeon, the patient was transferred to a tertiary referral centre for neurosurgery the same day. Complete loss of function of the CPN was confirmed. On the second day after ACL reconstruction, surgical exploration was performed. The peroneal and the tibial nerves were identified below the level of the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve and tested with electrical stimuli, which showed a complete loss of function of the CPN. No discontinuity of the CPN was seen. An intraneural haematoma, which was causing axonotmesis (damage to the peripheral axons with an intact nerve sheet), was observed roughly at the level of the myotendinous junction of the semitendinosus. An extended neurolysis was performed to decompress the fascicular bundles of the CPN.
Outcome and follow-up
One month after the ACL reconstruction and surgical exploration, the wounds had healed well, knee range of motion was 125°–0°–0°, and the anterior drawer and Lachman test were symmetrical for the left and right knee. Motor function of the peroneal nerve had not improved. There was dysesthesia over the anterolateral side of the lower leg and the dorsum of the foot, for which amitriptyline and pregabalin were prescribed. Return of motor function was first observed 6 months after the ACL reconstruction, with Medical Research Council (MRC) grade-4 muscle power.7 At 1-year follow-up, the result of the ACL reconstruction was satisfactory, with the knee stable in all planes, a full range of motion and no signs of muscle atrophy compared with the contralateral thigh and leg. Some hypoaesthesia remained in the distal anterolateral portion of the leg and the lateral aspect of the foot. Motor function of the tibialis anterior and the peroneus muscles had recovered, showing MRC grade-5 muscle power.
Discussion
Peroneal nerve injury due to harvesting of a semitendinosus graft is a rare complication of this commonly used technique, and the authors of the present paper could identify only three earlier case reports.8–10 Surgeons are aware of the close relation of the saphenous nerve to the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and take care to protect this nerve during an ACL-reconstruction procedure. This can be achieved by placing the leg in a ‘figure-of-four’ position when harvesting the tendon, as described by Pagnani et al,2 thereby minimising tension on the saphenous nerve; by making an oblique or transverse rather than a longitudinal incision on the anteromedial side of the proximal tibia; and by carefully aiming the tendon stripper in the direction of the tendon and not in a medial direction to avoid contact with the nerve.
The fact that the CPN can also be at risk during this procedure is less well known. With increased use of all-inside ACL reconstructions, the mini-incision technique at the posteromedial side of the knee to harvest the semitendinosus tendon has gained popularity. Park et al proposed that with this harvesting technique, surgeons might aim the tendon stripper too far towards the midline in an effort to avoid the saphenous nerve, thereby bringing the tip of the tendon stripper closer to the CPN9 (figure 3).
Diagram of the posterior thigh showing the correct and incorrect directions to aim the tendon stripper during hamstring graft harvesting and the area of the thigh in which the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve can be situated. The white arrow indicates the correct direction for the tendon stripper and the black arrows incorrect directions. Semi-T=semitendinosus, CPN=common peroneal nerve. Reprinted and adapted from Vardi G. Sciatic nerve injury following hamstring harvest.The Knee 2004;11:37–39. 2003 Elsevier Science BV, with permission from Elsevier.

The patient in this case report had a short stature and a muscular body disposition accompanied by a marked calibre change at the myotendinous junction, possibly causing the stripper to cut through the semitendinosus tendon at the myotendinous junction, rather than stripping the tendon off of the muscle belly. This might have caused the stripper to digress towards the midline and thus towards the CPN. This might also be the reason the tendon was too short for the ACL reconstruction.
We advise when an abnormal resistance is felt on progression of the tendon stripper, extra attention should be paid to the direction of the tendon stripper and it should be advanced carefully with a limited axial rotational or toggling motion.
We hope that this case report will help make surgeons more aware of this rare complication of hamstring tendon graft harvesting and that it will help them avoid injuring the CPN with the tendon stripper. Increased awareness of this possible complication can also help surgeons to recognise it at an early stage and offer appropriate treatment, if necessary by consulting a neurosurgeon and rehabilitation physician.
Learning points
-
The common peroneal nerve has a closer relationship to the hamstring tendons than most surgeons realise. Aiming the tendon stripper too far towards the midline, might place the nerve at risk during hamstring tendon harvesting.
-
Individual patient anatomy can alter the relative proximity of certain anatomical structures to the surgical work field.
-
When abnormal resistance is felt on progression of the tendon stripper, extra caution is warranted on the direction of the stripper and it should be advanced carefully with a limited axial rotational or toggling motion.
-
Early neurosurgical consultation and intervention can be beneficial for the outcome of nerve injury.
Footnotes
-
Contributors RM collected case data and drafted the manuscript. AvH is the treating physician of the patient in question and read and reviewed the manuscript. RH and RBGB read and reviewed the manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer